World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mark W. Baldwin

Mark W. Baldwin

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
34
Citations
12666
World Ranking
9998
National Ranking
693

Mark W. Baldwin publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark W. Baldwin sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 73 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Mark W. Baldwin D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark W. Baldwin sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark W. Baldwin is affiliated with McGill University in Canada. Their research spans a blend of psychology, neuroscience, and engineering, primarily focusing on the biological and psychological mechanisms underlying stress responses and behavioral regulation.

The main fields of study for Baldwin include Psychology, Engineering, and Neuroscience. This multidisciplinary approach is further refined into subfields such as Social Psychology, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Control and Systems Engineering, Behavioral Neuroscience, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

Baldwin's work addresses topics centered on Stress Responses and Cortisol, Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior, Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes, Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment, Real-time simulation and control systems, Social and Intergroup Psychology, and Behavioral Health and Interventions.

The scientist has published several papers covering a broad range of topics and venues:

  • Systematic manipulations of the biological stress systems result in sex-specific compensatory stress responses and negative mood outcomes (2020, Neuropsychopharmacology)
  • The effects of suppressing the biological stress systems on social threat-assessment following acute stress (2020, Psychopharmacology)
  • Variability across time in implicit weight-related bias: Random noise or meaningful fluctuations? (2023, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
  • Visuospatial perspective shifting and relational self-association in dispositional shame and guilt (2021, Consciousness and Cognition)
  • Inertia Estimation and Trend Analysis of the United States Power Grid Interconnections (2024, IEEE Access)

Frequent publication venues for Baldwin include Neuropsychopharmacology, Psychopharmacology, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Consciousness and Cognition, and IEEE Access.

Baldwin has collaborated often with several coauthors, including Nida Ali, Jonas P. Nitschke, Cory Cooperman, Jens C. Pruessner, and Yilu Liu, each appearing in multiple publications alongside Baldwin.

Best Publications

  • Relational schemas and the processing of social information.

    Mark W. Baldwin

  • Social-cognitive conceptualization of attachment working models : Availability and accessibility effects

    Mark W. Baldwin;John Patrick Richard Keelan;Beverley Fehr;Vicki Enns

  • On the instability of attachment style ratings

    Mark W. Baldwin;Beverley Fehr

  • Priming relationship schemas: My advisor and the pope are watching me from the back of my mind

    Mark W Baldwin;Suzanne E Carrell;David F Lopez

  • Salient Private Audiences and Awareness of the Self

    Mark W. Baldwin;John G. Holmes

  • An Exploration of the Relational Schemata Underlying Attachment Styles: Self-Report and Lexical Decision Approaches

    Mark W. Baldwin;Beverley Fehr;Erin Keedian;Mariena Seidel

  • Cutting stress off at the pass: Reducing vigilance and responsiveness to social threat by manipulating attention.

    Stéphane D Dandeneau;Mark W Baldwin;Jodene R Baccus;Maya Sakellaropoulo

  • Affective-cognitive consistency and the effect of salient behavioral information on the self-perception of attitudes.

    Shelly Chaiken;Mark W. Baldwin

  • Self-esteem and "if…then" contingencies of interpersonal acceptance.

    Mark W. Baldwin;Lisa Sinclair

  • Self-esteem, locus of control, hippocampal volume, and cortisol regulation in young and old adulthood.

    Jens C. Pruessner;Mark W. Baldwin;Katarina Dedovic;Robert Renwick

  • Increasing Implicit Self-Esteem Through Classical Conditioning

    Jodene R. Baccus;Mark W. Baldwin;Dominic J. Packer

  • Self-Criticism and Self-Warmth: An Imagery Study Exploring Their Relation to Depression

    Paul Gilbert;Mark W. Baldwin;Chris Irons;Jodene R. Baccus

  • The Inhibition of Socially Rejecting Information Among People with High Versus Low Self-Esteem: The Role of Attentional Bias and the Effects of Bias Reduction Training

    Stéphane D. Dandeneau;Mark W. Baldwin

  • Parental recall, attachment relating and self-attacking/self-reassurance: their relationship with depression.

    C. Irons;P. Gilbert;M.W. Baldwin;J. R. Baccus

  • Primed Relational Schemas as a Source of Self-Evaluative Reactions

    Mark W. Baldwin

  • Relational Schemas and Cognition in Close Relationships

    Mark W. Baldwin

  • Selfhood: Identity, Esteem, Regulation

    Rick H. Hoyle;Michael H. Kernis;Mark R. Leary;Mark W. Baldwin

  • Relational Schemas as a Source of If-Then Self-Inference Procedures

    Mark W. Baldwin

  • Anger in Close Relationships: An Interpersonal Script Analysis

    Beverley Fehr;Mark Baldwin;Lois Collins;Suzanne Patterson

  • Self-esteem and "if…then" contingencies of interpersonal acceptance.

    Unknown

  • Understanding and Modifying the Relational Schemas Underlying Insecurity.

    Mark W. Baldwin;Stéphane D. Dandeneau

  • The Cued Activation of Attachment Relational Schemas

    Mark W. Baldwin;Jennifer Meunier

  • Indirect Assessment of Cognitions of Child Sexual Abusers With the Implicit Association Test

    Kevin L. Nunes;Philip Firestone;Mark W. Baldwin

Frequent Co-Authors

Jens C. Pruessner
Jens C. Pruessner University of Konstanz
Mark R. Leary
Mark R. Leary Duke University
Rick H. Hoyle
Rick H. Hoyle Duke University
Michael H. Kernis
Michael H. Kernis University of Georgia
Beverley Fehr
Beverley Fehr University of Winnipeg
Paul Gilbert
Paul Gilbert University of Derby
Veronika Engert
Veronika Engert Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Kirsten McEwan
Kirsten McEwan University of Derby
John G. Holmes
John G. Holmes University of Waterloo
Aaron C. Kay
Aaron C. Kay Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens doors to a wide range of online degrees and professional opportunities in the USA. Online psychology and counseling programs are increasingly popular for those seeking flexible educational paths and quicker entry into the workforce.

Many states offer accelerated online degree programs designed to help you kick-start your counseling career. For those looking for efficiency, you may want to review the shortest path to becoming a counselor in Maine or see what steps are required for the fastest way to become a counselor in Maryland. Other states, like Massachusetts, also have guidelines for the shortest path to becoming a counselor in Massachusetts.

If you’re interested in options in the Midwest, you can explore Michigan fastest counseling programs to see how quickly you can launch your career. By choosing the right online degree and understanding state-specific requirements, you can find a streamlined pathway into counseling or other psychology-related roles.

Best Scientists Citing Mark W. Baldwin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles