World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
74
Citations
37994
World Ranking
1829
National Ranking
1077

Rick H. Hoyle publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rick H. Hoyle sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 195 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Rick H. Hoyle D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rick H. Hoyle sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2005 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Rick H. Hoyle is affiliated with Duke University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on psychology and social sciences, with a particular emphasis on clinical psychology, sociology and political science, social psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, and applied psychology. The scope of their work covers diverse themes related to behavioral and mental health, developmental psychology, and the impact of technology on adolescents.

The main topics addressed in Rick H. Hoyle's research include:

  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Resilience and Mental Health
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Rick H. Hoyle has published extensively in the field of psychology, with 67 publications and 37 in social sciences. Their contributions have appeared frequently in venues such as UNC Libraries, Personality and Individual Differences, Social and Personality Psychology Compass, PLoS ONE, and the International Journal of Community Well-Being. These five venues accounted for a significant portion of their output.

Your notable recent papers include:

  • "Young Adolescents' Digital Technology Use, Perceived Impairments, and Well-Being in a Representative Sample," 2020, The Journal of Pediatrics
  • "Flexibility in Using Self-Regulatory Strategies to Manage Self-Control Conflicts: The Role of Metacognitive Knowledge, Strategy Repertoire, and Feedback Monitoring," 2021, European Journal of Personality
  • "The Questionable Practice of Partialing to Refine Scores on and Inferences About Measures of Psychological Constructs," 2023, Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
  • "Sensation Seeking and Its Relationship with Psychopathic Traits, Impulsivity and Aggression: A Validation of the Dutch Brief Sensation Seeking Scale (BSSS)," 2021, Psychiatry Psychology and Law
  • "Self-Control and Affect Regulation Styles Predict Anxiety Longitudinally in University Students," 2020, Collabra Psychology

Frequent collaborators in their research include Fernanda C. Andrade, Kaitlyn Burnell, Erin K. Davisson, Candice L. Odgers, and Matthew Meyerson. The collaboration with these researchers reflects interdisciplinary and multi-method approaches in their scientific investigations.

Rick H. Hoyle was recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association in 2005, an acknowledgment of their contributions to the field of psychology.

Best Publications

  • Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues, and applications

    Rick H. Hoyle

  • Writing about structural equation models.

    Rick H. Hoyle;Abigail T. Panter

  • Students' goal orientations and cognitive engagement in classroom activities

    Judith L. Meece;Phyllis C. Blumenfeld;Rick H. Hoyle

  • The structural equation modeling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues.

    Rick H. Hoyle

  • Reliability and validity of a brief measure of sensation seeking

    Rick H Hoyle;Michael T Stephenson;Philip Palmgreen;Elizabeth Pugzles Lorch

  • Perceived Cohesion: A Conceptual and Empirical Examination

    Kenneth A. Bollen;Rick H. Hoyle

  • Handbook of structural equation modeling

    Rick H. Hoyle

  • Handbook of individual differences in social behavior

    Mark R. Leary;Rick H. Hoyle

  • Formulating clinical research hypotheses as structural equation models: a conceptual overview.

    Rick H. Hoyle;Gregory T. Smith

  • Statistical Strategies for Small Sample Research

    Rick H. Hoyle

  • Personality and sexual risk taking: a quantitative review.

    Rick H. Hoyle;Michelle C. Fejfar;Joshua D. Miller

  • Brief measures of sensation seeking for screening and large-scale surveys

    Michael T Stephenson;Rick H Hoyle;Philip Palmgreen;Michael D Slater

  • Confirmatory Factor Analysis

    Rick H. Hoyle

  • Cognitive and interpersonal features of intellectual humility.

    Mark R Leary;Kate J Diebels;Erin K Davisson;Katrina P Jongman-Sereno;Katrina P Jongman-Sereno

  • The Perils of Partialling: Cautionary Tales From Aggression and Psychopathy

    Donald R. Lynam;Rick H. Hoyle;Joseph P. Newman

  • Television campaigns and adolescent marijuana use: tests of sensation seeking targeting.

    Philip Palmgreen;Lewis Donohew;Elizabeth Pugzles Lorch;Rick H. Hoyle

  • Future orientation in the self-system: possible selves, self-regulation, and behavior.

    Rick H. Hoyle;Michelle R. Sherrill

  • Sensation seeking and drug use by adolescents and their friends: models for marijuana and alcohol.

    R. L. Donohew;Rick H. Hoyle;R. R. Clayton;W. F. Skinner

  • Young Athletes' Perceptions of Parental Support and Pressure.

    Stephen S. Leff;Rick H. Hoyle

  • Dispositional Envy

    Unknown

  • Motives and perceived consequences of Nonmedical ADHD medication use by college students: Are students treating themselves for attention problems?

    David L. Rabiner;Arthur D. Anastopoulos;E. Jane Costello;Rick H. Hoyle

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark R. Leary
Mark R. Leary Duke University
Corrine I. Voils
Corrine I. Voils University of Wisconsin–Madison
Michael T. Stephenson
Michael T. Stephenson Texas A&M University
David C. Rubin
David C. Rubin Duke University
Philip Palmgreen
Philip Palmgreen University of Kentucky
Candice L. Odgers
Candice L. Odgers University of California, Irvine
Chester A. Insko
Chester A. Insko University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Elizabeth Pugzles Lorch
Elizabeth Pugzles Lorch University of Kentucky
David L. Rabiner
David L. Rabiner Duke University
Mark W. Baldwin
Mark W. Baldwin McGill University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens the door to a wide range of rewarding career pathways, especially in counseling and therapy. Online psychology degrees are increasingly popular, offering flexibility for both full-time students and working professionals.

As you plan your career, it's important to understand the specific education and licensing requirements in your intended location. For instance, becoming a licensed therapist in Lexington involves completing a graduate program, supervised clinical hours, and passing relevant exams.

Similarly, those interested in practicing in Nebraska should review the Lincoln licensed therapist education requirements, which detail the necessary degrees and steps toward licensure.

If you're looking toward California, learn about the Long Beach licensed therapist requirements or the licensed therapist requirements in Los Angeles. Both regions have distinctive processes for education, supervised experience, and state exams.

Researching these pathways can help you choose the right online degree and ensure you meet all regional qualifications for your psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Rick H. Hoyle

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles