World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
56
Citations
9974
World Ranking
3518
National Ranking
1524

Susan T. Lovett publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Susan T. Lovett sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 107 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Susan T. Lovett D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Susan T. Lovett sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 2012 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Susan T. Lovett is affiliated with Brandeis University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with significant contributions across related subfields including Molecular Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Genetics, General Health Professions, and Ecology.

Their scholarly work emphasizes a range of topics, particularly the mechanisms of DNA repair, bacterial genetics and biotechnology, public health policies and education, ethics in clinical research, zoonotic diseases and public health, as well as CRISPR and genetic engineering. RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms also feature among their main research interests.

Frequent co-authors in their publications include:

  • Corrella S. Detweiler
  • Patrick D. Schloss
  • César A. Arias
  • Andreas J. Bäumler
  • Arturo Casadevall

Susan T. Lovett's work has appeared repeatedly in a number of scientific journals, with notable frequent publication venues being:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
  • mBio
  • Genetics
  • Journal of Bacteriology

Among recent publications, key papers include:

  • The ASM Journals Committee Values the Contributions of Black Microbiologists, 2020, mSphere
  • The ASM Journals Committee Values the Contributions of Black Microbiologists, 2020, Clinical Microbiology Reviews
  • Generation and Repair of Postreplication Gaps in Escherichia coli, 2023, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
  • The DNA damage response of Escherichia coli, revisited: Differential gene expression after replication inhibition, 2024, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • The Role of Replication Clamp-Loader Protein HolC of Escherichia coli in Overcoming Replication/Transcription Conflicts, 2021, mBio

The scientist has been recognized with fellowships from major scientific organizations, including being named a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 2020 and a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2012.

Best Publications

  • Phenotypic Landscape of a Bacterial Cell

    Robert J. Nichols;Saunak Sen;Yoe Jin Choo;Pedro Beltrao

  • Instability of repetitive DNA sequences: The role of replication in multiple mechanisms

    Malgorzata Bzymek;Susan T. Lovett

  • Identification and purification of a single-stranded-DNA-specific exonuclease encoded by the recJ gene of Escherichia coli

    Susan T. Lovett;Richard D. Kolodner

  • Two related recombinases are required for site-specific recombination at dif and cer in E. coli K12.

    Garry Blakely;Gerhard May;Richard McCulloch;Lidia K. Arciszewska

  • Encoded errors: mutations and rearrangements mediated by misalignment at repetitive DNA sequences.

    Susan T. Lovett

  • In vivo requirement for RecJ, ExoVII, ExoI, and ExoX in methyl-directed mismatch repair.

    Vickers Burdett;Celia Baitinger;Mohan Viswanathan;Susan T. Lovett

  • Break-Induced DNA Replication

    Ranjith P. Anand;Susan T. Lovett;James E. Haber

  • Crossing Over Between Regions of Limited Homology in Escherichia coli : RecA-Dependent and RecA-Independent Pathways

    Susan T Lovett;Rebecca L Hurley;Vincent A Sutera;Rachel H Aubuchon

  • The Genetic Dependence of Recombination in Recd Mutants of Escherichia Coli

    S T Lovett;C Luisi-DeLuca;R D Kolodner

  • Genetic analysis of the recJ gene of Escherichia coli K-12.

    S T Lovett;A J Clark

  • RecJ exonuclease: substrates, products and interaction with SSB

    Eugene S. Han;Deani L. Cooper;Nicole S. Persky;Vincent A. Sutera

  • Single-Strand DNA-Specific Exonucleases in Escherichia coli: Roles in Repair and Mutation Avoidance

    Mohan Viswanathan;Susan T. Lovett

  • A Sister-Strand Exchange Mechanism for Reca-Independent Deletion of Repeated DNA Sequences in Escherichia Coli

    S T Lovett;P T Drapkin;V A Sutera;T J Gluckman-Peskind

  • The Stringent Response and Cell Cycle Arrest in Escherichia coli

    Daniel J. Ferullo;Susan T. Lovett

  • Crystal Structures of Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium 3-Isopropylmalate Dehydrogenase and Comparison with their Thermophilic Counterpart from Thermus thermophilus

    Gerlind Wallon;Gitay Kryger;Susan T Lovett;Tairo Oshima

  • Regulation of RAD54- and RAD52-lacZ gene fusions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae in response to DNA damage.

    G M Cole;D Schild;S T Lovett;R K Mortimer

  • Redundant Exonuclease Involvement in Escherichia coli Methyl-directed Mismatch Repair

    Mohan Viswanathan;Vickers Burdett;Vickers Burdett;Celia Baitinger;Celia Baitinger;Paul Modrich;Paul Modrich

  • Reconstitution of initial steps of dsDNA break repair by the RecF pathway of E. coli.

    Naofumi Handa;Katsumi Morimatsu;Susan T. Lovett;Stephen C. Kowalczykowski

  • RecA-independent recombination is efficient but limited by exonucleases.

    Bethany E. Dutra;Vincent A. Sutera;Susan T. Lovett

  • Sequence of the RAD55 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: similarity of RAD55 to prokaryotic RecA and other RecA-like proteins.

    Susan T. Lovett

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrick D. Schloss
Patrick D. Schloss University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Harold L. Drake
Harold L. Drake University of Bayreuth
Jack A. Gilbert
Jack A. Gilbert University of California, San Diego
Peter Tontonoz
Peter Tontonoz University of California, Los Angeles
Thomas J. Silhavy
Thomas J. Silhavy Princeton University
Andreas J. Bäumler
Andreas J. Bäumler University of California, Davis
Cesar A. Arias
Cesar A. Arias The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Arturo Casadevall
Arturo Casadevall Johns Hopkins University
Michael J. Sadowsky
Michael J. Sadowsky University of Minnesota
Craig E. Cameron
Craig E. Cameron University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Genetics often opens doors to a range of related degrees and career paths, many of which can be pursued entirely online. Students interested in health administration or the business side of medicine may consider medical billing and coding schools online, which offer a practical route into healthcare careers.

For those eager to fast-track their education, several universities offer accelerated degrees in science and healthcare fields. These programs can help you enter the workforce sooner, saving time and tuition costs.

Flexibility is another key benefit of online study, and accredited self paced online colleges allow you to learn at your own speed, making it easier to balance studies with work or family commitments.

Additionally, there are online schools no application fee available, which can reduce initial costs as you begin your academic journey. Exploring these options can support your long-term career growth whether you choose Genetics or a related field.

Best Scientists Citing Susan T. Lovett

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles