World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 50 2552 2305 1254 1122 82 11001

Athanasios Typas publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Athanasios Typas between 2004 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Athanasios Typas published across 23 years, from 2004 to 2026, averaging 6.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2020. 17 of the 141 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2020. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 4 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 0 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 3 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 4 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 15 publications 2026: 2 publications
2004 2026

141 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Athanasios Typas: publications per year, 2004 to 2026
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 0
2006 1
2007 4
2008 1
2009 0
2010 1
2011 3
2012 1
2013 4
2014 6
2015 4
2016 3
2017 10
2018 10
2019 4
2020 18
2021 11
2022 11
2023 14
2024 17
2025 15
2026 2
Total 141
Download as CSV

Athanasios Typas publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Athanasios Typas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 77–86 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 82 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90 82
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Athanasios Typas D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Athanasios Typas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130 50
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Athanasios Typas is affiliated with the Molecular Medicine Partnership Unit in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on the field of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with particular contributions to subfields such as Molecular Biology, Genetics, Ecology, Infectious Diseases, and Endocrinology.

The scientist's work spans multiple topics, including:

  • Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
  • Gut microbiota and health
  • Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
  • Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
  • Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

Athanasios Typas has published extensively, with frequent appearances in several key venues. These include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Molecular Systems Biology, EMPIAR dataset, Nature, and Nature Microbiology.

Notable recent papers authored by Athanasios Typas include:

  • Unravelling the collateral damage of antibiotics on gut bacteria, 2021, Nature
  • A Dual-Mechanism Antibiotic Kills Gram-Negative Bacteria and Avoids Drug Resistance, 2020, Cell
  • Bioaccumulation of therapeutic drugs by human gut bacteria, 2021, Nature
  • Thermal proteome profiling for interrogating protein interactions, 2020, Molecular Systems Biology
  • Bacterial retrons encode phage-defending tripartite toxin-antitoxin systems, 2022, Nature

Frequent collaborators of Athanasios Typas include:

  • Mikhail M. Savitski
  • André Mateus
  • Kiran Raosaheb Patil
  • Peer Bork
  • Lisa Maier

Best Publications

  • Extensive impact of non-antibiotic drugs on human gut bacteria

    Lisa Maier;Mihaela Pruteanu;Michael Kuhn;Georg Zeller

  • From the regulation of peptidoglycan synthesis to bacterial growth and morphology

    Athanasios Typas;Manuel Banzhaf;Carol A. Gross;Waldemar Vollmer

  • Salt-responsive gut commensal modulates TH17 axis and disease

    Nicola Wilck;Mariana G. Matus;Sean M. Kearney;Scott W. Olesen

  • Recovery of gut microbiota of healthy adults following antibiotic exposure

    Albert Palleja;Kristian H Mikkelsen;Sofia K Forslund;Alireza Kashani

  • Phenotypic Landscape of a Bacterial Cell

    Robert J. Nichols;Saunak Sen;Yoe Jin Choo;Pedro Beltrao

  • A new antibiotic selectively kills Gram-negative pathogens

    Yu Imai;Kirsten J. Meyer;Akira Iinishi;Quentin Favre-Godal

  • Construction and Analysis of Two Genome-Scale Deletion Libraries for Bacillus subtilis

    Byoung-Mo Koo;George Kritikos;Jeremiah D. Farelli;Horia Todor

  • Selective Ribosome Profiling Reveals the Cotranslational Chaperone Action of Trigger Factor In Vivo

    Eugene Oh;Annemarie H. Becker;Arzu Sandikci;Damon Huber

  • Country-specific antibiotic use practices impact the human gut resistome

    Kristoffer Forslund;Shinichi Sunagawa;Jens Roat Kultima;Daniel R. Mende

  • Regulation of Peptidoglycan Synthesis by Outer-Membrane Proteins

    Athanasios Typas;Manuel Banzhaf;Bart van den Berg van Saparoea;Jolanda Verheul

  • Species-specific activity of antibacterial drug combinations

    Ana Rita Brochado;Anja Telzerow;Jacob Bobonis;Manuel Banzhaf

  • Yeast Creates a Niche for Symbiotic Lactic Acid Bacteria through Nitrogen Overflow

    Olga Ponomarova;Natalia Gabrielli;Daniel C. Sévin;Michael Mülleder

  • A Dual-Mechanism Antibiotic Kills Gram-Negative Bacteria and Avoids Drug Resistance.

    James K. Martin;Joseph P. Sheehan;Benjamin P. Bratton;Gabriel M. Moore

  • High-throughput, quantitative analyses of genetic interactions in E. coli

    Athanasios Typas;Robert J Nichols;Deborah A Siegele;Michael Shales

  • Fe-S Cluster Biosynthesis Controls Uptake of Aminoglycosides in a ROS-Less Death Pathway

    Benjamin Ezraty;Alexandra Vergnes;Manuel Banzhaf;Yohann Duverger

  • Emerging and evolving concepts in gene essentiality.

    Giulia Rancati;Jason Moffat;Athanasios Typas;Norman Pavelka

  • Nutritional preferences of human gut bacteria reveal their metabolic idiosyncrasies

    Melanie Tramontano;Sergej Andrejev;Mihaela Pruteanu;Martina Klünemann

  • Host-Microbe Co-metabolism Dictates Cancer Drug Efficacy in C. elegans

    Timothy A. Scott;Leonor M. Quintaneiro;Leonor M. Quintaneiro;Povilas Norvaisas;Prudence P. Lui

  • Pervasive Protein Thermal Stability Variation during the Cell Cycle.

    Isabelle Becher;Amparo Andrés-Pons;Natalie Romanov;Frank Stein

  • Bioaccumulation of therapeutic drugs by human gut bacteria

    Martina Klünemann;Sergej Andrejev;Sonja Blasche;Andre Mateus

Frequent Co-Authors

Mikhail M. Savitski
Mikhail M. Savitski European Bioinformatics Institute
Pedro Beltrao
Pedro Beltrao European Bioinformatics Institute
Peer Bork
Peer Bork European Molecular Biology Laboratory
Carol A. Gross
Carol A. Gross University of California, San Francisco
Waldemar Vollmer
Waldemar Vollmer Newcastle University
Kiran Raosaheb Patil
Kiran Raosaheb Patil European Bioinformatics Institute
Eefjan Breukink
Eefjan Breukink Utrecht University
Erick Denamur
Erick Denamur Université Paris Cité
Olivier Clermont
Olivier Clermont Université Paris Cité
Shinichi Sunagawa
Shinichi Sunagawa Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students intrigued by Molecular Biology but considering diverse healthcare careers, there are several fast-track online programs available in the USA. One popular route is pursuing accelerated nursing programs for non nurses. These programs are designed for individuals with a different bachelor’s degree and aim to quickly transition them into the nursing profession.

For those looking to advance further, becoming a nurse practitioner is an attractive option. If you're curious about the journey, learn about how to become nurse practitioner and discover the optimal educational pathways. Accelerated BSN programs are also a great choice for registered nurses looking to earn their bachelor's degree efficiently—check out the accelerated bsn programs that can be completed in as little as six months.

Considering career prospects? If you’re interested in combining healthcare and mental health, it's helpful to know how much does a psychiatric nurse practitioner make. With various flexible online degree options, students in molecular biology can find a rewarding career path aligned with their interests and expertise.

Best Scientists Citing Athanasios Typas

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles