World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Best Scientists
2025
Award Badge
Molecular Biology
Germany
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Best Scientists

D-Index
254
Citations
407395
World Ranking
44
National Ranking
2

Molecular Biology

D-Index
254
Citations
433232
World Ranking
3
National Ranking
1

Peer Bork publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peer Bork sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 702 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

Peer Bork D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peer Bork sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 254 D-Index — 100th percentile

100% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Molecular Biology in Germany Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Best Scientists Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Molecular Biology in Germany Leader Award
  • 2024 - Research.com Genetics and Molecular Biology in Germany Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Genetics in Germany Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Genetics and Molecular Biology in Germany Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Genetics and Molecular Biology in Germany Leader Award
  • 2018 - Member of Academia Europaea
  • 2014 - German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina - Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina – Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften Human Genetics and Molecular Medicine
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)

Overview

Peer Bork is affiliated with the European Molecular Biology Laboratory in Germany and has made substantial contributions to the fields of biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, alongside medicine. Their research spans several subfields including molecular biology, ecology, infectious diseases, epidemiology, and genetics.

The main topics in their work include:

  • Gut microbiota and health
  • Genomics and phylogenetic studies
  • Microbial community ecology and physiology
  • Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
  • Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
  • Liver disease diagnosis and treatment
  • Metabolomics and mass spectrometry studies

Peer Bork has published extensively in multiple venues. The most frequent publication venues are:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nucleic Acids Research
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Nature
  • Journal of Hepatology

Some of their recent significant papers include:

  • Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation, 2021, Nucleic Acids Research
  • The STRING database in 2021: customizable protein-protein networks, and functional characterization of user-uploaded gene/measurement sets, 2020, Nucleic Acids Research
  • The STRING database in 2023: protein-protein association networks and functional enrichment analyses for any sequenced genome of interest, 2022, Nucleic Acids Research
  • eggNOG-mapper v2: Functional Annotation, Orthology Assignments, and Domain Prediction at the Metagenomic Scale, 2021, Molecular Biology and Evolution
  • InterPro in 2022, 2022, Nucleic Acids Research

Collaborations have been a significant part of their career. Peer Bork has frequently co-authored publications with the following researchers:

  • Thomas Schmidt
  • Anthony Fullam
  • Michael Kuhn
  • Shinichi Sunagawa
  • Luís Pedro Coelho

Peer Bork has received several distinctions including membership in notable scientific organizations. These awards include:

  • Member of the Academia Europaea, 2018
  • German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina - Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina - Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften, 2014, in the field of Human Genetics and Molecular Medicine
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)

Best Publications

  • Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome.

    Eric S. Lander;Lauren M. Linton;Bruce Birren;Chad Nusbaum

  • STRING v11: protein-protein association networks with increased coverage, supporting functional discovery in genome-wide experimental datasets.

    Damian Szklarczyk;Annika L. Gable;David Lyon;Alexander Junge

  • A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations.

    Ivan A Adzhubei;Steffen Schmidt;Leonid Peshkin;Vasily E Ramensky

  • A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing

    Junjie Qin;Ruiqiang Li;Jeroen Raes;Manimozhiyan Arumugam

  • STRING v10: protein–protein interaction networks, integrated over the tree of life

    Damian Szklarczyk;Andrea Franceschini;Stefan Wyder;Kristoffer Forslund

  • Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation.

    Ivica Letunic;Peer Bork;Peer Bork;Peer Bork

  • Enterotypes of the human gut microbiome

    Manimozhiyan Arumugam;Jeroen Raes;Eric Pelletier;Denis Le Paslier

  • Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome.

    Robert H. Waterston;Kerstin Lindblad-Toh;Ewan Birney;Jane Rogers

  • The STRING database in 2021: customizable protein-protein networks, and functional characterization of user-uploaded gene/measurement sets.

    Damian Szklarczyk;Annika L. Gable;Katerina C. Nastou;David Lyon

  • The STRING database in 2017: quality-controlled protein-protein association networks, made broadly accessible.

    Damian Szklarczyk;John H. Morris;Helen Cook;Michael Kuhn

  • Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes

    Anne-Claude Gavin;Markus Bösche;Roland Krause;Paola Grandi

  • Richness of human gut microbiome correlates with metabolic markers

    Trine Nielsen;Junjie Qin;Edi Prifti

  • Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v4: recent updates and new developments.

    Ivica Letunic;Peer Bork

  • Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v3: an online tool for the display and annotation of phylogenetic and other trees

    Ivica Letunic;Peer Bork

  • STRING v9.1: protein-protein interaction networks, with increased coverage and integration

    Andrea Franceschini;Damian Szklarczyk;Sune Frankild;Michael Kuhn

  • eggNOG 5.0: a hierarchical, functionally and phylogenetically annotated orthology resource based on 5090 organisms and 2502 viruses.

    Jaime Huerta-Cepas;Damian Szklarczyk;Davide Heller;Ana Hernández-Plaza

  • SMART, a simple modular architecture research tool: Identification of signaling domains

    Jörg Schultz;Frank Milpetz;Peer Bork;Chris P. Ponting

  • The STRING database in 2011: functional interaction networks of proteins, globally integrated and scored

    Damian Szklarczyk;Andrea Franceschini;Michael Kuhn;Milan Simonovic

  • Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery

    Anne-Claude Gavin;Patrick Aloy;Paola Grandi;Roland Krause

  • SMART, a simple modular architecture research tool

    J Schultz;F Milpetz;P Bork;Chris Ponting

Frequent Co-Authors

Shinichi Sunagawa
Shinichi Sunagawa Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
Jeroen Raes
Jeroen Raes KU Leuven
Ivica Letunic
Ivica Letunic European Bioinformatics Institute
Christian von Mering
Christian von Mering University of Zurich
Chris P. Ponting
Chris P. Ponting University of Edinburgh
Patrick Wincker
Patrick Wincker University of Paris-Saclay
Manimozhiyan Arumugam
Manimozhiyan Arumugam University of Copenhagen
Anne-Claude Gavin
Anne-Claude Gavin University of Geneva
Richard R. Copley
Richard R. Copley Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics
Jörg Schultz
Jörg Schultz University of Würzburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring molecular biology in the USA can open doors to diverse and rewarding career opportunities—both inside and outside of the laboratory. Many related fields also offer flexible online education options, making it easier to build specialized skills from anywhere.

For example, graduates interested in mental health care or genetics counseling may benefit from the best online clinical psychology programs. Those drawn toward advocacy, social outreach, or patient care might consider earning a human services degree online, which is often a fast route to hands-on roles in community health.

If your background is in education, making a transition is possible. Learn more about how to make a career change from teacher to SLP (speech pathologist), a pathway that can align with molecular and neurological research.

Interested in the interplay between biology and design? Consider the architect degree online, which is especially relevant for students curious about bio-inspired design or scientific facility planning.

Whether you seek lab work, clinical positions, or interdisciplinary fields, there are many online options to support your molecular biology journey.

Best Scientists Citing Peer Bork

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles