World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
129
Citations
59613
World Ranking
264
National Ranking
138

Richard D. Kolodner publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard D. Kolodner sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 332 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Richard D. Kolodner D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard D. Kolodner sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 129 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)
  • 2008 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 2000 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 1996 - Charles S. Mott Prize, General Motors Cancer Research Foundation

Overview

Richard D. Kolodner is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, as well as medicine.

Their work spans several subfields of study, including molecular biology, pathology and forensic medicine, plant science, oncology, and genetics. Key topics in their research include DNA repair mechanisms, genetic factors in colorectal cancer, CRISPR and genetic engineering, RNA research and splicing, RNA modifications and cancer, plant genetic and mutation studies, and BRCA gene mutations in cancer.

Among recent publications authored or co-authored by Kolodner are the following:

  • Tumour predisposition and cancer syndromes as models to study gene-environment interactions, 2020, Nature reviews. Cancer
  • FEN1 endonuclease as a therapeutic target for human cancers with defects in homologous recombination, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Ligation of newly replicated DNA controls the timing of DNA mismatch repair, 2021, Current Biology
  • Rad27 and Exo1 function in different excision pathways for mismatch repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, 2021, Nature Communications
  • Mechanisms underlying genome instability mediated by formation of foldback inversions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, 2020, eLife

Their frequent co-authors include Christopher D. Putnam, Bin-Zhong Li, Felipe A. Calil, Kendall A. Torres, and Matthew L. DuPrie.

Publication venues with multiple contributions from Kolodner consist of Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature reviews. Cancer, Current Biology, Nature Communications, and eLife.

Richard D. Kolodner's research contributions have been recognized by various professional societies. Their awards include membership in the National Academy of Sciences (2000), fellowship in the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (2008), membership in the National Academy of Medicine (2013), and the Charles S. Mott Prize from the General Motors Cancer Research Foundation in 1996.

Best Publications

  • The human mutator gene homolog MSH2 and its association with hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer.

    Richard Fishel;Mary Kay Lescoe;M.R.S. Rao;Neal G. Copeland

  • Mutation in the DNA mismatch repair gene homologue hMLH 1 is associated with hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer

    Bronner Ce;Baker Sm;Morrison Pt;Warren G

  • Incidence and functional consequences of hMLH1 promoter hypermethylation in colorectal carcinoma

    James G. Herman;Asad Umar;Kornelia Polyak;Jeremy R. Graff

  • Mutation of a new gene encoding a putative pyrin-like protein causes familial cold autoinflammatory syndrome and Muckle–Wells syndrome

    Hal M. Hoffman;James L. Mueller;David H. Broide;Alan A. Wanderer

  • Methylation of the hMLH1 Promoter Correlates with Lack of Expression of hMLH1 in Sporadic Colon Tumors and Mismatch Repair-defective Human Tumor Cell Lines

    Kane Mf;Loda M;Gaida Gm;Lipman J

  • α-Synuclein Blocks ER-Golgi Traffic and Rab1 Rescues Neuron Loss in Parkinson's Models

    Antony A. Cooper;Aaron D. Gitler;Anil Cashikar;Cole M. Haynes

  • Eukaryotic DNA mismatch repair.

    Richard D Kolodner;Gerald T Marsischky

  • Saccharomyces Ku70, Mre11/Rad50, and RPA Proteins Regulate Adaptation to G2/M Arrest after DNA Damage

    Sang Eun Lee;J.Kent Moore;Allyson Holmes;Keiko Umezu

  • The evolution of genes: the chicken preproinsulin gene

    Francine Perler;Argiris Efstratiadis;Peter Lomedico;Walter Gilbert

  • Biochemistry and genetics of eukaryotic mismatch repair.

    R Kolodner

  • hMSH2 forms specific mispair-binding complexes with hMSH3 and hMSH6

    Samir Acharya;Teresa Wilson;Scott Gradia;Michael F. Kane

  • Meiotic Pachytene Arrest in MLH1-Deficient Mice

    Winfried Edelmann;Paula E Cohen;Michael Kane;Kirkland Lau

  • Redundancy of Saccharomyces cerevisiae MSH3 and MSH6 in MSH2-dependent mismatch repair.

    Gerald T. Marsischky;Nicole Filosi;Michael F. Kane;Richard Kolodner

  • Maintenance of genome stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

    Richard D. Kolodner;Christopher D. Putnam;Kyungjae Myung

  • The structure and evolution of the two nonallelic rat preproinsulin genes

    Peter Lomedico;Nadia Rosenthal;Argiris Efstratiadis;Walter Gilbert

  • Identification and characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae EXO1, a gene encoding an exonuclease that interacts with MSH2

    Daniel X. Tishkoff;Adrienne L. Boerger;Pascale Bertrand;Nicole Filosi

  • Rewiring of genetic networks in response to DNA damage

    Sourav Bandyopadhyay;Monika Mehta;Dwight Kuo;Min Kyung Sung

  • MutS homolog 4 localization to meiotic chromosomes is required for chromosome pairing during meiosis in male and female mice

    Burkhard Kneitz;Paula E. Cohen;Elena Avdievich;Liyin Zhu

  • A Novel Mutation Avoidance Mechanism Dependent on S. cerevisiae RAD27 Is Distinct from DNA Mismatch Repair

    Daniel X. Tishkoff;Nicole Filosi;Gretchen M. Gaida;Richard D. Kolodner

  • Gross chromosomal rearrangements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae replication and recombination defective mutants.

    Clark Chen;Richard D. Kolodner

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher D. Putnam
Christopher D. Putnam University of California, San Diego
Huilin Zhou
Huilin Zhou University of California, San Diego
Winfried Edelmann
Winfried Edelmann Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Raju Kucherlapati
Raju Kucherlapati Harvard University
Judy Garber
Judy Garber Harvard University
Arshad Desai
Arshad Desai University of California, San Diego
Kyungjae Myung
Kyungjae Myung Institute for Basic Science
Wolf Dietrich Heyer
Wolf Dietrich Heyer University of California, Davis
Arlen W. Johnson
Arlen W. Johnson The University of Texas at Austin
Hal M. Hoffman
Hal M. Hoffman University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Genetics in the USA can open doors to a wide range of rewarding careers across healthcare and life sciences. For those interested in entering the fast-growing health industry, several online degrees and certification options can complement a background in genetics or help you transition into related fields.

Many students begin with specialized training, such as medical billing and coding certification, which offers quick entry into the healthcare workforce with a focus on administrative and technical skills. Others may consider nursing. If you're seeking flexible entry into patient care, learning what is the easiest nursing program to get into can help you identify programs that suit your academic background and goals.

For those interested in leadership roles, pursuing a degree in healthcare administration can accelerate your career path, especially with online and accelerated programs available. Alternatively, if cost is a concern, an online health management degree offers an affordable route to developing management expertise for healthcare organizations.

No matter which path you choose, these online programs provide flexible options for students eager to begin or advance their careers in the broader health and genetics fields.

Best Scientists Citing Richard D. Kolodner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles