World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 39 8426 8088 520 508 125 5174

Jörg Prietzel publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jörg Prietzel between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jörg Prietzel published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 4.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2017. 11 of the 139 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2017. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 3 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 10 publications
1992 2025

139 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jörg Prietzel: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 1
1994 0
1995 3
1996 2
1997 2
1998 3
1999 2
2000 1
2001 3
2002 0
2003 2
2004 5
2005 3
2006 4
2007 3
2008 9
2009 3
2010 6
2011 2
2012 5
2013 6
2014 3
2015 4
2016 9
2017 18
2018 3
2019 7
2020 8
2021 4
2022 2
2023 4
2024 1
2025 10
Total 139
Download as CSV

Jörg Prietzel publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jörg Prietzel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 125 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617 125
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Jörg Prietzel D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jörg Prietzel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275 39
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Jörg Prietzel is affiliated with the Technical University of Munich in Germany, contributing extensively to the fields of environmental science and agricultural and biological sciences. Their research focuses on soil science, environmental chemistry, biomaterials, and ecology, with a specific emphasis on soil interactions and nutrient dynamics.

The main research themes include:

  • Clay minerals and soil interactions
  • Soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics
  • Soil and water nutrient dynamics
  • Peatlands and wetlands ecology
  • Soil and unsaturated flow
  • Iron oxide chemistry and applications
  • Geology and paleoclimatology research

Prietzel's recent published work demonstrates engagement with diverse aspects of soil and ecosystem studies. Selected publications include:

  • "Half a century of Scots pine forest ecosystem monitoring reveals long-term effects of atmospheric deposition and climate change" (2020, Global Change Biology)
  • "The fate of calcium in temperate forest soils: a Ca K-edge XANES study" (2020, Biogeochemistry)
  • "From rock eating to vegetarian ecosystems - Disentangling processes of phosphorus acquisition across biomes" (2020, Geoderma)
  • "Dissolved and colloidal phosphorus affect P cycling in calcareous forest soils" (2020, Geoderma)
  • "Influence of Physical-Chemical Soil Parameters on Microbiota Composition and Diversity in a Deep Hyperarid Core of the Atacama Desert" (2022, Frontiers in Microbiology)

Frequently publishing in well-known venues, Prietzel contributes mostly to:

  • Geoderma
  • Biogeochemistry
  • Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science
  • Global Change Biology
  • Frontiers in Microbiology

Collaboration is evident with recurring co-authors, who include:

  • Wantana Klysubun
  • Luís Carlos Colocho Hurtarte
  • Wulf Amelung
  • Friederike Lang
  • Gertraud Harrington

Research conducted by Prietzel provides data on long-term ecosystem monitoring, phosphorus cycling, soil calcium dynamics, and microbial diversity in extreme environments. The work integrates biogeochemistry and soil science to understand nutrient interactions and environmental impacts on forest and soil ecosystems.

Best Publications

  • Soil organic matter stabilization in acidic forest soils is preferential and soil type-specific

    S. Spielvogel;J. Prietzel;I. Kögel‐Knabner

  • Phosphorus in forest ecosystems: New insights from an ecosystem nutrition perspective

    Friederike Lang;Jürgen Bauhus;Emmanuel Frossard;Eckhard George

  • Soil phosphorus supply controls P nutrition strategies of beech forest ecosystems in Central Europe

    F. Lang;J. Krüger;W. Amelung;S. Willbold

  • Synchrotron-based P K-edge XANES spectroscopy reveals rapid changes of phosphorus speciation in the topsoil of two glacier foreland chronosequences

    Jörg Prietzel;Alexander Dümig;Yanhong Wu;Jun Zhou

  • Storage and drivers of organic carbon in forest soils of southeast Germany (Bavaria) - Implications for carbon sequestration

    Martin Wiesmeier;Jörg Prietzel;Frauke Barthold;Peter Spörlein

  • Sulfur Speciation in Soil by S K-Edge XANES Spectroscopy: Comparison of Spectral Deconvolution and Linear Combination Fitting

    Jörg Prietzel;Anna Botzaki;Nora Tyufekchieva;Mareike Brettholle

  • Speciation of phosphorus in temperate zone forest soils as assessed by combined wet-chemical fractionation and XANES spectroscopy

    Jörg Prietzel;Wantana Klysubun;Florian Werner

  • The use of stable sulfur and oxygen isotope ratios for interpreting the mobility of sulfate in aerobic forest soils

    B. Mayer;P. Fritz;J. Prietzel;H.R. Krouse

  • Soil organic carbon and nitrogen stocks under pure and mixed stands of European beech, Douglas fir and Norway spruce

    Maike Cremer;Nils Valentin Kern;Jörg Prietzel

  • Iron speciation in soils and soil aggregates by synchrotron‐based X‐ray microspectroscopy (XANES,μ‐XANES)

    Unknown

  • Speciation of sulphur in soils and soil particles by X‐ray spectromicroscopy

    J. Prietzel;J. Thieme;U. Neuhäusler;J. Susini

  • Causes and Consequences of Forest Growth Trends in Europe – Results of the RECOGNITION Project

    H. P. Kahle;T. Karjalainen;A. Schuck;G. I. Ågren

  • Standard Protocol and Quality Assessment of Soil Phosphorus Speciation by P K-Edge XANES Spectroscopy

    Florian Werner;Jörg Prietzel

  • Organic carbon stocks in forest soils of the German Alps

    Jörg Prietzel;Dominik Christophel

  • Changes of soil phosphorus speciation along a 120-year soil chronosequence in the Hailuogou Glacier retreat area (Gongga Mountain, SW China)

    Jun Zhou;Yanhong Wu;Jörg Prietzel;Haijian Bing

  • Organic matter losses in German Alps forest soils since the 1970s most likely caused by warming

    Jörg Prietzel;Lothar Zimmermann;Alfred Schubert;Dominik Christophel

  • Reference spectra of important adsorbed organic and inorganic phosphate binding forms for soil P speciation using synchrotron-based K-edge XANES spectroscopy.

    Jörg Prietzel;Gertraud Harrington;Werner Häusler;Katja Heister

  • Sulfur K-edge XANES spectroscopy reveals differences in sulfur speciation of bulk soils, humic acid, fulvic acid, and particle size separates

    Jörg Prietzel;Jürgen Thieme;Murielle Salomé;Heike Knicker

  • Changes of soil chemistry, stand nutrition, and stand growth at two Scots pine ( Pinus sylvestris L.) sites in Central Europe during 40 years after fertilization, liming, and lupine introduction

    Jörg Prietzel;Karl Eugen Rehfuess;Ulrich Stetter;Hans Pretzsch

  • Changes in soil organic C and N stocks after forest transformation from Norway spruce and Scots pine into Douglas fir, Douglas fir/spruce, or European beech stands at different sites in Southern Germany

    Jörg Prietzel;Sven Bachmann

  • Changes of lignin phenols and neutral sugars in different soil types of a high-elevation forest ecosystem 25 years after forest dieback

    Sandra Spielvogel;Jörg Prietzel;Ingrid Kögel-Knabner

  • Recent carbon and nitrogen accumulation and acidification in soils of two Scots pine ecosystems in Southern Germany

    Jörg Prietzel;Ulrich Stetter;Hans-Joachim Klemmt;Karl Eugen Rehfuess

  • Long-term trends of phosphorus nutrition and topsoil phosphorus stocks in unfertilized and fertilized Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) stands at two sites in Southern Germany

    Jörg Prietzel;Ulrich Stetter

  • Long-term nutritional trends of conifer stands in Europe: results from the RECOGNITION project

    Karl Heinz Mellert;Jörg Prietzel;Ralf Straussberger;Karl Eugen Rehfuess

Frequent Co-Authors

Ingrid Kögel-Knabner
Ingrid Kögel-Knabner Technical University of Munich
Carsten W. Mueller
Carsten W. Mueller University of Copenhagen
Bernhard Mayer
Bernhard Mayer University of Calgary
Seppo Kellomäki
Seppo Kellomäki University of Eastern Finland
Göran I. Ågren
Göran I. Ågren Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Wulf Amelung
Wulf Amelung University of Bonn
Hans Pretzsch
Hans Pretzsch Technical University of Munich
Robert Mikutta
Robert Mikutta Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Yakov Kuzyakov
Yakov Kuzyakov University of Göttingen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond Environmental Sciences, various online degrees offer flexible options to advance your career. Many professionals explore the best eds to edd programs to enhance leadership and research skills, particularly in education-related fields tied to environmental policy and sustainability.

Social work is another complementary path, focusing on community health and advocacy, which ties closely to environmental justice. Students can pursue affordable credentials through dsw programs, designed for those aiming to impact social and environmental welfare on a larger scale.

For a broader academic approach, many opt for a low cost online general studies degree, allowing interdisciplinary studies that can include environmental topics alongside other relevant subjects. This flexibility can open doors to diverse career opportunities.

If time or rigorous courses are a concern, exploring the easiest degree to get can provide a manageable way to earn a credential that supports career growth in environmental fields without overwhelming commitment.

Best Scientists Citing Jörg Prietzel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles