World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
73
Citations
18299
World Ranking
1427
National Ranking
609

Myron J. Mitchell publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Myron J. Mitchell sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 258 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Myron J. Mitchell D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Myron J. Mitchell sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1992 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Myron J. Mitchell is affiliated with SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry in the United States. Their research spans several interconnected areas within environmental science and social sciences.

The main fields of study in which they contribute include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Social Sciences

Within these broader fields, their subfields of study focus on:

  • Water Science and Technology
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Sociology and Political Science

Mitchell's work addresses key topics such as:

  • Water Quality and Resources Studies
  • Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Transboundary Water Resource Management

Their recent paper is titled "Long-term ecosystem monitoring at Huntington Forest: Integrating hydrology, biogeochemistry and climatic controls on watershed processes", published in 2021 in the journal Hydrological Processes.

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Charles T. Driscoll
  • Colin M. Beier
  • James A. Mills
  • Patrick McHale
  • KIMBERLEY M. DRISCOLL

Myron J. Mitchell has published predominantly in the venue Hydrological Processes.

In recognition of their contributions, Mitchell was awarded the title of Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1992.

Best Publications

  • A meta-analysis of the response of soil respiration, net nitrogen mineralization, and aboveground plant growth to experimental ecosystem warming

    L.E. Rustad;J.L. Campbell;G.M. Marion;R.J. Norby

  • Who needs environmental monitoring

    Gary M. Lovett;Douglas A. Burns;Charles T. Driscoll;Jennifer C. Jenkins

  • Potential effects of climate change and variability on watershed biogeochemical processes and water quality in Northeast Asia.

    Ji Hyung Park;Lei Duan;Bomchul Kim;Myron J. Mitchell

  • Climatic Control of Nitrate Loss from Forested Watersheds in the Northeast United States

    Myron J. Mitchell;Charles T. Driscoll;Jeffrey S. Kahl;Gene E. Likens

  • Chemical response of lakes in the Adirondack Region of New York to declines in acidic deposition

    Charles T. Driscoll;Kimberley M. Driscoll;Karen M. Roy;Myron J. Mitchell

  • Winter in northeastern North America: a critical period for ecological processes

    John L. Campbell;Myron J. Mitchell;Peter M. Groffman;Lynn M. Christenson

  • Effects of acidic deposition on forest and aquatic ecosystems in New York State.

    Charles T Driscoll;Kimberley M Driscoll;Myron J Mitchell;Dudley J Raynal

  • Insect Defoliation and Nitrogen Cycling in Forests

    Gary M. Lovett;Lynn M. Christenson;Peter M. Groffman;Clive G. Jones

  • Dissolved organic matter (DOM) concentration and quality in a forested mid-Atlantic watershed, USA

    Shreeram Inamdar;Nina Finger;Shatrughan Singh;Myron Mitchell

  • The biogeochemistry of sulfur at Hubbard Brook

    Gene E. Likens;Charles T. Driscoll;Donald C. Buso;Myron J. Mitchell

  • Nitrogen saturation in Japanese forested watersheds.

    Kiyokazu Ohrui;Myron J. Mitchell

  • Fluorescence characteristics and sources of dissolved organic matter for stream water during storm events in a forested mid‐Atlantic watershed

    Shreeram Inamdar;Shatrughan Singh;Sudarshan Dutta;Delphis Levia

  • Sulphate, Nitrogen and Base Cation Budgets at 21 Forested Catchments in Canada, the United States and Europe

    Shaun A. Watmough;Julian Aherne;Christine Alewell;Paul Arp

  • Consequences of climate change for biogeochemical cycling in forests of northeastern North America

    John L. CampbellJ.L. Campbell;Lindsey E. RustadL.E. Rustad;Elizabeth W. BoyerE.W. Boyer;Sheila F. ChristopherS.F. Christopher

  • Hydrologic and topographic controls on storm‐event exports of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and nitrate across catchment scales

    Shreeram P. Inamdar;Myron J. Mitchell

  • Export mechanisms for dissolved organic carbon and nitrate during summer storm events in a glaciated forested catchment in New York, USA

    Shreeram P. Inamdar;Sheila F. Christopher;Myron J. Mitchell

  • Regional assessment of N saturation using foliar and root δ15N

    L. H. Pardo;P. H. Templer;C. L. Goodale;S. Duke

  • Sugar maple and nitrogen cycling in the forests of Eastern North America.

    Gary M. Lovett;Myron J. Mitchell

  • Paleoecological investigation of recent lake acidification in the Adirondack Mountains, N.Y.

    Donald F. Charles;Michael W. Binford;Edward T. Furlong;Ronald A. Hites

  • A field-based study of soil water and groundwater nitrate release in an Adirondack forested watershed

    Michael R. McHale;Michael R. McHale;Jeffrey J. McDonnell;Myron J. Mitchell;Christopher P. Cirmo

  • Regional Assessment of N Saturation using Foliar and Root <img src="/fulltext-image.asp?format=htmln

    Linda H. Pardo;Pamela H. Templer;Christine L. Goodale;Sara E. Duke;Sara E. Duke

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles T. Driscoll
Charles T. Driscoll Syracuse University
Gene E. Likens
Gene E. Likens University of Connecticut
Shreeram Inamdar
Shreeram Inamdar University of Delaware
Bernhard Mayer
Bernhard Mayer University of Calgary
Delphis F. Levia
Delphis F. Levia University of Delaware
Peter M. Groffman
Peter M. Groffman City University of New York
Mark B. David
Mark B. David University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Ivan J. Fernandez
Ivan J. Fernandez University of Maine
Douglas A. Burns
Douglas A. Burns United States Geological Survey
Scott W. Bailey
Scott W. Bailey US Forest Service

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degree options related to Environmental Sciences can broaden your career possibilities and enhance your expertise. For those interested in the social aspects of environmental issues, pursuing one of the best online bachelors in sociology programs can provide valuable insights into human behavior and societal impacts on the environment.

If you're aiming for advanced leadership roles or academic positions, consider online doctoral programs without dissertation. These flexible options can help educators and professionals progress without the traditional dissertation hurdle, making doctoral education more accessible.

For educators specializing in Environmental Sciences, transitioning from an EdS to EdD program is a strategic path for career advancement. Numerous eds to edd program options allow seamless progress from specialist to doctoral levels in education.

Additionally, professionals interested in combining environmental and social work can explore some of the online dsw programs in social work. These programs prepare graduates to address both community welfare and environmental justice challenges effectively.

Best Scientists Citing Myron J. Mitchell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles