World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Gareth J. Morgan

Gareth J. Morgan

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 135 2028 1888 1149 1055 1353 86830

Gareth J. Morgan publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Gareth J. Morgan between 1979 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Gareth J. Morgan published across 47 years, from 1979 to 2025, averaging 39 papers a year. Output peaked at 341 publications in 2023. 106 of the 1,835 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
100 200 300
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1979 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 341. Peak 341 publications in 2023. 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 4 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 2 publications 1990: 8 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 17 publications 1997: 19 publications 1998: 11 publications 1999: 13 publications 2000: 20 publications 2001: 23 publications 2002: 25 publications 2003: 27 publications 2004: 28 publications 2005: 36 publications 2006: 40 publications 2007: 52 publications 2008: 52 publications 2009: 49 publications 2010: 52 publications 2011: 53 publications 2012: 51 publications 2013: 66 publications 2014: 77 publications 2015: 83 publications 2016: 90 publications 2017: 94 publications 2018: 87 publications 2019: 83 publications 2020: 71 publications 2021: 80 publications 2022: 39 publications 2023: 341 publications 2024: 95 publications 2025: 11 publications
1979 2025

1,835 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Gareth J. Morgan: publications per year, 1979 to 2025
Year Publications
1979 1
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 1
1986 4
1987 5
1988 1
1989 2
1990 8
1991 6
1992 5
1993 4
1994 8
1995 5
1996 17
1997 19
1998 11
1999 13
2000 20
2001 23
2002 25
2003 27
2004 28
2005 36
2006 40
2007 52
2008 52
2009 49
2010 52
2011 53
2012 51
2013 66
2014 77
2015 83
2016 90
2017 94
2018 87
2019 83
2020 71
2021 80
2022 39
2023 341
2024 95
2025 11
Total 1,835
Download as CSV

Gareth J. Morgan publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gareth J. Morgan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 1,341–1,360 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,353 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30 1,353
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Gareth J. Morgan D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gareth J. Morgan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 134–135 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 135 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163 135
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Gareth J. Morgan is affiliated with Boston University in the United States and has made extensive contributions to the fields of medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their research emphasizes hematology, molecular biology, oncology, cancer research, and genetics with a strong focus on multiple myeloma and related disorders.

The scientist's main research topics include multiple myeloma research and treatments, protein degradation and inhibitors, cancer genomics and diagnostics, peptidase inhibition and analysis, cancer treatment and pharmacology, cancer mechanisms and therapy, and ubiquitin and proteasome pathways.

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Blood
  • Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature Communications
  • Leukemia

Prominent papers that reflect their research contributions are:

  • International Myeloma Working Group risk stratification model for smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM), 2020, Blood Cancer Journal
  • Localizing the Sustainable Development Goals Through the Lens of Urban Resilience: Lessons and Learnings from 100 Resilient Cities and Cape Town, 2020, Sustainability
  • Preclinical activity and determinants of response of the GPRC5DxCD3 bispecific antibody talquetamab in multiple myeloma, 2021, Blood Advances
  • The molecular make up of smoldering myeloma highlights the evolutionary pathways leading to multiple myeloma, 2021, Nature Communications
  • Revealing the Impact of Structural Variants in Multiple Myeloma, 2020, Blood Cancer Discovery

Collaborations have been established with several researchers, notably Faith E. Davies, Francesco Maura, Ola Landgren, Eileen M. Boyle, and Brian A. Walker, who are frequent co-authors and have contributed extensively alongside Morgan.

Best Publications

  • International staging system for multiple myeloma.

    Philip R. Greipp;Jesus San Miguel;Brian G.M. Durie;John J. Crowley

  • International uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma

    B. G. M. Durie;J.-L. Harousseau;J. S. Miguel;J. Blade

  • Criteria for the classification of monoclonal gammopathies, multiple myeloma and related disorders: a report of the International Myeloma Working Group

    Robert A. Kyle;J. Anthony Child;Kenneth Anderson;Bart Barlogie

  • Design and standardization of PCR primers and protocols for detection of clonal immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor gene recombinations in suspect lymphoproliferations: report of the BIOMED-2 Concerted Action BMH4-CT98-3936.

    J J M van Dongen;A W Langerak;M Brüggemann;P A S Evans

  • The Global Syndemic of Obesity, Undernutrition, and Climate Change: The Lancet Commission report

    Boyd A Swinburn;Boyd A Swinburn;Vivica I Kraak;Steven Allender;Vincent J Atkins

  • High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell rescue for multiple myeloma.

    J. Anthony Child;Gareth J. Morgan;Faith E. Davies;Roger G. Owen

  • Revised International Staging System for Multiple Myeloma: A Report From International Myeloma Working Group

    Antonio Palumbo;Hervé Avet-Loiseau;Stefania Oliva;Henk M. Lokhorst

  • Thalidomide and immunomodulatory derivatives augment natural killer cell cytotoxicity in multiple myeloma.

    Faith E. Davies;Noopur Raje;Noopur Raje;Noopur Raje;Teru Hideshima;Teru Hideshima;Teru Hideshima;Suzanne Lentzsch;Suzanne Lentzsch;Suzanne Lentzsch

  • International Myeloma Working Group molecular classification of multiple myeloma: spotlight review.

    R Fonseca;P L Bergsagel;J Drach;J Shaughnessy

  • The genetic architecture of multiple myeloma

    Gareth J. Morgan;Brian A. Walker;Faith E. Davies

  • Prevention of thalidomide- and lenalidomide-associated thrombosis in myeloma

    A. Palumbo;S. V. Rajkumar;M. A. Dimopoulos;P. G. Richardson

  • Risk of progression and survival in multiple myeloma relapsing after therapy with IMiDs and bortezomib: A multicenter international myeloma working group study

    S. K. Kumar;J. H. Lee;J. J. Lahuerta;G. Morgan

  • International Myeloma Working Group guidelines for serum-free light chain analysis in multiple myeloma and related disorders

    A. Dispenzieri;R. Kyle;G. Merlini;J. S. Miguel

  • Polymorphisms in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene are associated with susceptibility to acute leukemia in adults

    Christine F. Skibola;Martyn T. Smith;Eleanor Kane;Eve Roman

  • First-line treatment with zoledronic acid as compared with clodronic acid in multiple myeloma (MRC Myeloma IX): a randomised controlled trial

    Gareth J Morgan;Faith E Davies;Walter M Gregory;Kim Cocks

  • Images of organization, 2nd ed.

    Gareth Morgan

  • Mutational Spectrum, Copy Number Changes, and Outcome: Results of a Sequencing Study of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Myeloma

    Brian A. Walker;Eileen M. Boyle;Christopher P. Wardell;Alex Murison

  • In vivo CAMPATH-1H prevents graft-versus-host disease following nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation.

    Panagiotis D Kottaridis;Donald W Milligan;Rajesh Chopra;Ronjon Chakraverty

  • Early Mortality After Diagnosis of Multiple Myeloma: Analysis of Patients Entered Onto the United Kingdom Medical Research Council Trials Between 1980 and 2002--Medical Research Council Adult Leukaemia Working Party

    Bradley M. Augustson;Gulnaz Begum;Janet A. Dunn;Nicola J. Barth

  • Myeloma management guidelines: a consensus report from the Scientific Advisors of the International Myeloma Foundation.

    Brian G M Durie;Robert A. Kyle;Andrew Belch;William Bensinger

Frequent Co-Authors

Faith E. Davies
Faith E. Davies New York University Langone Medical Center
Brian A Walker
Brian A Walker Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis
Graham Jackson
Graham Jackson University of Newcastle Australia
Walter M Gregory
Walter M Gregory University of Leeds
Mark T. Drayson
Mark T. Drayson University of Birmingham
Frits van Rhee
Frits van Rhee University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Maurizio Zangari
Maurizio Zangari University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Bart Barlogie
Bart Barlogie Mount Sinai Hospital
Pieter Sonneveld
Pieter Sonneveld Erasmus University Rotterdam
Joshua Epstein
Joshua Epstein University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative and supplementary online degrees can expand your options in the medical field. Many students interested in healthcare find value in pursuing the cheapest rn to bsn online programs, which enable registered nurses to earn a bachelor's degree efficiently and affordably.

For those without a prior nursing background, there are accessible options such as online bsn programs for non nurses. These programs help career changers enter the nursing profession through flexible, online study paths.

Some students may wish to leap directly into advanced practice roles. If this is your goal, consider the convenience of direct msn programs online, designed for individuals without prior nursing degrees, offering a streamlined route to a master's qualification.

Not all medical careers require direct patient care. In-demand administrative paths, such as medical billing and coding, offer flexible training options. If financial aid is a concern, research medical billing and coding schools that accept fafsa to support your education goals.

Best Scientists Citing Gareth J. Morgan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles