World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Angela Dispenzieri

Angela Dispenzieri

Award Badge
Best Female Scientists
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Best Female Scientists 158 103 94 59 54 1805 105451
Medicine 164 652 597 376 337 1723 114666

Angela Dispenzieri publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Angela Dispenzieri between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Angela Dispenzieri published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 47.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 137 publications in 2021. 77 of the 1,799 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 137. Peak 137 publications in 2021. 1988: 2 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 13 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 19 publications 2004: 49 publications 2005: 68 publications 2006: 65 publications 2007: 66 publications 2008: 75 publications 2009: 74 publications 2010: 75 publications 2011: 67 publications 2012: 86 publications 2013: 84 publications 2014: 74 publications 2015: 79 publications 2016: 98 publications 2017: 113 publications 2018: 110 publications 2019: 124 publications 2020: 110 publications 2021: 137 publications 2022: 65 publications 2023: 46 publications 2024: 48 publications 2025: 29 publications
1988 2025

1,799 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Angela Dispenzieri: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 2
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 1
1998 0
1999 5
2000 8
2001 13
2002 9
2003 19
2004 49
2005 68
2006 65
2007 66
2008 75
2009 74
2010 75
2011 67
2012 86
2013 84
2014 74
2015 79
2016 98
2017 113
2018 110
2019 124
2020 110
2021 137
2022 65
2023 46
2024 48
2025 29
Total 1,799
Download as CSV

Angela Dispenzieri publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Angela Dispenzieri sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 1,721–1,740 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,723 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12 1,723
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Angela Dispenzieri D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Angela Dispenzieri sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 164–165 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 164 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53 164
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Female Scientists Award

Overview

Angela Dispenzieri is affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States and has contributed extensively to medical research with a primary focus on medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their research spans multiple subfields, including molecular biology, hematology, oncology, genetics, and nephrology.

Major topics addressed in their work include amyloidosis diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes; multiple myeloma research and treatments; parathyroid disorders and treatments; protein degradation and inhibitors; chronic lymphocytic leukemia research; peptidase inhibition and analysis; and myeloproliferative neoplasms diagnosis and treatment.

Frequent collaborators in their research include Shaji Kumar, Morie A. Gertz, Francis K. Buadi, Taxiarchis Kourelis, and S. Vincent Rajkumar, reflecting a network of researchers involved in related hematologic and oncologic studies.

The scientist has published numerous papers in prominent venues such as Blood, Blood Cancer Journal, American Journal of Hematology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, and Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia. These platforms highlight their engagement with high-impact research communities in hematology and oncology.

Significant recent publications by Angela Dispenzieri include:

  • Overview of Castleman disease, 2020, Blood
  • Systemic Amyloidosis Recognition, Prognosis, and Therapy, 2020, JAMA
  • Amyloid nomenclature 2022: update, novel proteins, and recommendations by the International Society of Amyloidosis (ISA) Nomenclature Committee, 2022, Amyloid
  • Systemic amyloidosis from A (AA) to T (ATTR): a review, 2020, Journal of Internal Medicine
  • ASNC/AHA/ASE/EANM/HFSA/ISA/SCMR/SNMMI Expert Consensus Recommendations for Multimodality Imaging in Cardiac Amyloidosis: Part 1 of 2-Evidence Base and Standardized Methods of Imaging, 2021, Circulation Cardiovascular Imaging

Best Publications

  • International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma.

    S. Vincent Rajkumar;Meletios A. Dimopoulos;Antonio Palumbo;Joan Blade

  • Review of 1027 Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

    Robert A. Kyle;Morie A. Gertz;Thomas E. Witzig;John A. Lust

  • Improved survival in multiple myeloma and the impact of novel therapies

    Shaji K. Kumar;S. Vincent Rajkumar;Angela Dispenzieri;Martha Q. Lacy

  • Nonbiopsy Diagnosis of Cardiac Transthyretin Amyloidosis.

    Julian D. Gillmore;Mathew S. Maurer;Rodney H. Falk;Giampaolo Merlini

  • Prevalence of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance

    Robert A. Kyle;Terry M. Therneau;S. Vincent Rajkumar;Dirk R. Larson

  • Continued improvement in survival in multiple myeloma: changes in early mortality and outcomes in older patients

    S K Kumar;A Dispenzieri;M Q Lacy;M A Gertz

  • Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) consistently precedes multiple myeloma: A prospective study

    Ola Landgren;Robert A. Kyle;Ruth M. Pfeiffer;Jerry A. Katzmann

  • Revised Prognostic Staging System for Light Chain Amyloidosis Incorporating Cardiac Biomarkers and Serum Free Light Chain Measurements

    Shaji Kumar;Angela Dispenzieri;Martha Q. Lacy;Suzanne R. Hayman

  • Promiscuous Mutations Activate the Noncanonical NF-κB Pathway in Multiple Myeloma

    Jonathan J. Keats;Rafael Fonseca;Marta Chesi;Roelandt Schop

  • Clinical course and prognosis of smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma.

    Robert A. Kyle;Ellen D. Remstein;Terry M. Therneau;Angela Dispenzieri

  • Serum Cardiac Troponins and N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide: A Staging System for Primary Systemic Amyloidosis

    Angela Dispenzieri;Morie A. Gertz;Robert A. Kyle;Martha Q. Lacy

  • International Myeloma Working Group guidelines for serum-free light chain analysis in multiple myeloma and related disorders

    A. Dispenzieri;R. Kyle;G. Merlini;J. S. Miguel

  • Bortezomib with lenalidomide and dexamethasone versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma without intent for immediate autologous stem-cell transplant (SWOG S0777): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

    Brian G.M. Durie;Antje Hoering;Muneer H. Abidi;S. Vincent Rajkumar

  • POEMS syndrome: definitions and long-term outcome.

    Angela Dispenzieri;Robert A. Kyle;Martha Q. Lacy;S. Vincent Rajkumar

  • New Criteria for Response to Treatment in Immunoglobulin Light Chain Amyloidosis Based on Free Light Chain Measurement and Cardiac Biomarkers: Impact on Survival Outcomes

    Giovanni Palladini;Angela Dispenzieri;Morie A. Gertz;Shaji Kumar

  • Lenalidomide and dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible patients with myeloma

    Lotfi Benboubker;Meletios Athanasios Dimopoulos;Angela Dispenzieri;John Catalano

  • Combination therapy with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (Rev/Dex) for newly diagnosed myeloma.

    S. Vincent Rajkumar;Suzanne R. Hayman;Martha Q. Lacy;Angela Dispenzieri

  • Serum free light chain ratio is an independent risk factor for progression in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance

    S. Vincent Rajkumar;S. Vincent Rajkumar;Robert A. Kyle;Robert A. Kyle;Terry M. Therneau;Terry M. Therneau;L. Joseph Melton;L. Joseph Melton

  • Clonal competition with alternating dominance in multiple myeloma

    Jonathan J. Keats;Marta Chesi;Jan B. Egan;Victoria M. Garbitt

  • Combination Therapy With Thalidomide Plus Dexamethasone for Newly Diagnosed Myeloma

    S. Vincent Rajkumar;Suzanne Hayman;Morie A. Gertz;Angela Dispenzieri

Frequent Co-Authors

Morie A. Gertz
Morie A. Gertz Mayo Clinic
Shaji Kumar
Shaji Kumar Mayo Clinic
Martha Q. Lacy
Martha Q. Lacy Mayo Clinic
Francis K. Buadi
Francis K. Buadi Mayo Clinic
Robert A. Kyle
Robert A. Kyle Mayo Clinic
David Dingli
David Dingli Mayo Clinic
Nelson Leung
Nelson Leung Mayo Clinic
John A. Lust
John A. Lust Mayo Clinic

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in expanding their options beyond traditional medical school, there are several online degree pathways available that align with healthcare careers. If you're already a registered nurse and looking to advance your qualifications, exploring what is the cheapest rn to bsn program online can provide a cost-effective way to earn your BSN and unlock new career opportunities.

Those from non-nursing backgrounds can also transition into nursing through specialized online programs. Consider reviewing online direct entry msn programs for non-nurses as a pathway to a master’s degree in nursing even if your undergraduate degree is in another field.

Admission processes vary, but some institutions offer direct admit nursing programs that can simplify the transition for new nursing students. For those interested in non-clinical roles in healthcare, consider training options for administrative positions like medical coding and billing classes online with financial aid.

Each of these online pathways can help you start or advance your healthcare career—even before, after, or alongside pursuing a traditional Medicine degree in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Angela Dispenzieri

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles