World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Robert A. Kyle

Robert A. Kyle

Award Badge
Best Scientists
2025
Award Badge
Medicine
USA
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Best Scientists 190 425 394 286 260 1842 146381
Medicine 193 233 211 156 139 1833 153311

Robert A. Kyle publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Robert A. Kyle between 1959 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Robert A. Kyle published across 67 years, from 1959 to 2025, averaging 28.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 76 publications in 2018. 18 of the 1,909 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1959 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 76. Peak 76 publications in 2018. 1959: 1 publication 1960: 1 publication 1961: 2 publications 1962: 2 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 4 publications 1965: 3 publications 1966: 7 publications 1967: 3 publications 1968: 2 publications 1969: 1 publication 1970: 3 publications 1971: 3 publications 1972: 4 publications 1973: 10 publications 1974: 15 publications 1975: 18 publications 1976: 19 publications 1977: 11 publications 1978: 21 publications 1979: 28 publications 1980: 25 publications 1981: 33 publications 1982: 39 publications 1983: 24 publications 1984: 23 publications 1985: 17 publications 1986: 27 publications 1987: 25 publications 1988: 27 publications 1989: 25 publications 1990: 28 publications 1991: 31 publications 1992: 33 publications 1993: 21 publications 1994: 23 publications 1995: 24 publications 1996: 23 publications 1997: 31 publications 1998: 28 publications 1999: 39 publications 2000: 34 publications 2001: 35 publications 2002: 32 publications 2003: 41 publications 2004: 43 publications 2005: 53 publications 2006: 44 publications 2007: 50 publications 2008: 41 publications 2009: 48 publications 2010: 47 publications 2011: 47 publications 2012: 46 publications 2013: 53 publications 2014: 47 publications 2015: 52 publications 2016: 62 publications 2017: 66 publications 2018: 76 publications 2019: 71 publications 2020: 59 publications 2021: 71 publications 2022: 51 publications 2023: 18 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 5 publications
1959 2025

1,909 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Robert A. Kyle: publications per year, 1959 to 2025
Year Publications
1959 1
1960 1
1961 2
1962 2
1963 0
1964 4
1965 3
1966 7
1967 3
1968 2
1969 1
1970 3
1971 3
1972 4
1973 10
1974 15
1975 18
1976 19
1977 11
1978 21
1979 28
1980 25
1981 33
1982 39
1983 24
1984 23
1985 17
1986 27
1987 25
1988 27
1989 25
1990 28
1991 31
1992 33
1993 21
1994 23
1995 24
1996 23
1997 31
1998 28
1999 39
2000 34
2001 35
2002 32
2003 41
2004 43
2005 53
2006 44
2007 50
2008 41
2009 48
2010 47
2011 47
2012 46
2013 53
2014 47
2015 52
2016 62
2017 66
2018 76
2019 71
2020 59
2021 71
2022 51
2023 18
2024 13
2025 5
Total 1,909
Download as CSV

Robert A. Kyle publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert A. Kyle sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 1,796+ publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,833 publications — 100th percentile

100% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100 1,833
Download as CSV

Robert A. Kyle D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert A. Kyle sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 192–193 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 193 D-Index — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21 193
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Scientists Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in United States Leader Award

Overview

Robert A. Kyle is affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Medicine, with significant contributions to Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. The scientist's subfield expertise includes Hematology, Molecular Biology, Genetics, Oncology, and Pathology and Forensic Medicine.

The main topics covered in their research encompass Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments, Protein Degradation and Inhibitors, Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research, Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis, Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment, and Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment.

Frequent publication venues for Robert A. Kyle include Blood, Blood Cancer Journal, Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia, Mayo Clinic Proceedings, and the American Journal of Hematology.

Selected recent papers include:

  • Expert review on soft-tissue plasmacytomas in multiple myeloma: definition, disease assessment and treatment considerations, 2021, British Journal of Haematology
  • Primary plasma cell leukemia: consensus definition by the International Myeloma Working Group according to peripheral blood plasma cell percentage, 2021, Blood Cancer Journal
  • Cytogenetic abnormalities in multiple myeloma: association with disease characteristics and treatment response, 2020, Blood Cancer Journal
  • Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma with chromosome 1q abnormalities, 2020, Blood Advances
  • Mortality trends in multiple myeloma after the introduction of novel therapies in the United States, 2021, Leukemia

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Robert A. Kyle include Shaji Kumar, Morie A. Gertz, Angela Dispenzieri, S. Vincent Rajkumar, and Prashant Kapoor. These collaborations reflect sustained research networks within the fields of hematology and oncology.

Best Publications

  • International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma.

    S. Vincent Rajkumar;Meletios A. Dimopoulos;Antonio Palumbo;Joan Blade

  • International staging system for multiple myeloma.

    Philip R. Greipp;Jesus San Miguel;Brian G.M. Durie;John J. Crowley

  • International uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma

    B. G. M. Durie;J.-L. Harousseau;J. S. Miguel;J. Blade

  • Review of 1027 Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

    Robert A. Kyle;Morie A. Gertz;Thomas E. Witzig;John A. Lust

  • Criteria for the classification of monoclonal gammopathies, multiple myeloma and related disorders: a report of the International Myeloma Working Group

    Robert A. Kyle;J. Anthony Child;Kenneth Anderson;Bart Barlogie

  • Improved survival in multiple myeloma and the impact of novel therapies

    Shaji K. Kumar;S. Vincent Rajkumar;Angela Dispenzieri;Martha Q. Lacy

  • International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma

    Shaji Kumar;Bruno Paiva;Kenneth C. Anderson;Brian Durie

  • A long-term study of prognosis in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance.

    Robert A. Kyle;Terry M. Therneau;S. Vincent Rajkumar;Janice R. Offord

  • Primary systemic amyloidosis : clinical and laboratory features in 474 cases

    Kyle Ra;Gertz Ma

  • Prevalence of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance

    Robert A. Kyle;Terry M. Therneau;S. Vincent Rajkumar;Dirk R. Larson

  • Drug therapy: Multiple myeloma

    Robert A. Kyle;S. Vincent Rajkumar

  • Continued improvement in survival in multiple myeloma: changes in early mortality and outcomes in older patients

    S K Kumar;A Dispenzieri;M Q Lacy;M A Gertz

  • Criteria for diagnosis, staging, risk stratification and response assessment of multiple myeloma

    R A Kyle;S V Rajkumar

  • Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) consistently precedes multiple myeloma: A prospective study

    Ola Landgren;Robert A. Kyle;Ruth M. Pfeiffer;Jerry A. Katzmann

  • Multiple myeloma: review of 869 cases.

    Kyle Ra

  • Revised Prognostic Staging System for Light Chain Amyloidosis Incorporating Cardiac Biomarkers and Serum Free Light Chain Measurements

    Shaji Kumar;Angela Dispenzieri;Martha Q. Lacy;Suzanne R. Hayman

  • Consensus recommendations for the uniform reporting of clinical trials: report of the International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel 1

    S. Vincent Rajkumar;Jean Luc Harousseau;Brian Durie;Kenneth C. Anderson

  • Clinical course and prognosis of smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma.

    Robert A. Kyle;Ellen D. Remstein;Terry M. Therneau;Angela Dispenzieri

  • Increased Prevalence and Mortality in Undiagnosed Celiac Disease

    Alberto Rubio–Tapia;Robert A. Kyle;Edward L. Kaplan;Dwight R. Johnson

  • Prevention of thalidomide- and lenalidomide-associated thrombosis in myeloma

    A. Palumbo;S. V. Rajkumar;M. A. Dimopoulos;P. G. Richardson

Frequent Co-Authors

Morie A. Gertz
Morie A. Gertz Mayo Clinic
Shaji Kumar
Shaji Kumar Mayo Clinic
Martha Q. Lacy
Martha Q. Lacy Mayo Clinic
Francis K. Buadi
Francis K. Buadi Mayo Clinic
John A. Lust
John A. Lust Mayo Clinic
David Dingli
David Dingli Mayo Clinic
Nelson Leung
Nelson Leung Mayo Clinic

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re exploring a career in Medicine in the USA, there are many related online degrees and pathways that can support your ambitions. These programs offer flexibility for students balancing studies with work or other commitments, helping you boost your credentials at your own pace.

For nursing professionals seeking advanced roles, cheapest bsn to dnp programs allow you to earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice affordably and online. Pharmacists can find pharmacy school online accredited options that meet licensing standards and offer the convenience of distance learning.

Those interested in technology and business within healthcare may consider healthcare informatics degree programs to prepare for roles managing patient data and information systems. Additionally, if you’re seeking a quick start to a medical career, a low cost medical coding and billing online program can help you enter one of the fastest-growing fields in healthcare.

These diverse online pathways make it easier than ever to start or advance a profession in the healthcare sector, providing quality education at a lower cost.

Best Scientists Citing Robert A. Kyle

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles