World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Oliver Schneising

Oliver Schneising

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
36
Citations
5006
World Ranking
9144
National Ranking
552

Oliver Schneising publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Oliver Schneising sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 124 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Oliver Schneising D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Oliver Schneising sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Oliver Schneising is affiliated with the University of Bremen in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science and earth and planetary sciences, with an emphasis on global and planetary change as well as atmospheric science.

The scientist's work covers several subfields, including environmental chemistry, mechanics of materials, and health, toxicology, and mutagenesis. Their main research topics encompass atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, atmospheric ozone and climate, atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, methane hydrates and related phenomena, hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis, spectroscopy and laser applications, and meteorological phenomena and simulations.

Oliver Schneising has published extensively in several frequent venues, including:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Atmospheric measurement techniques
  • Remote Sensing
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Biogeosciences

Notable recent papers by Schneising include:

  • Remote sensing of methane leakage from natural gas and petroleum systems revisited (2020), Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Severe Californian wildfires in November 2018 observed from space: the carbon monoxide perspective (2020), Atmospheric chemistry and physics

Other relevant papers from the dataset featuring connected topics related to atmospheric measurements are:

  • Unexpected long-range transport of glyoxal and formaldehyde observed from the Copernicus Sentinel-5 Precursor satellite during the 2018 Canadian wildfires (2020), Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Can a regional-scale reduction of atmospheric CO 2 during the COVID-19 pandemic be detected from space? A case study for East China using satellite XCO 2 retrievals (2021), Atmospheric measurement techniques
  • Retrieval of greenhouse gases from GOSAT and GOSAT-2 using the FOCAL algorithm (2022), Atmospheric measurement techniques

Oliver Schneising has collaborated frequently with other researchers such as Michael Buchwitz, John P. Burrows, Maximilian Reuter, H. Bovensmann, and Matthias Buschmann. The highest collaboration counts were with Michael Buchwitz, followed by John P. Burrows and Maximilian Reuter.

Best Publications

  • A remote sensing technique for global monitoring of power plant CO 2 emissions from space and related applications

    H. Bovensmann;M. Buchwitz;J. P. Burrows;M. Reuter

  • Towards monitoring localized CO 2 emissions from space: co-located regional CO 2 and NO 2 enhancements observed by the OCO-2 and S5P satellites

    Maximilian Reuter;Michael Buchwitz;Oliver Schneising;Sven Krautwurst

  • Long-term analysis of carbon dioxide and methane column-averaged mole fractions retrieved from SCIAMACHY

    O. Schneising;M. Buchwitz;M. Reuter;J. Heymann

  • A method for improved SCIAMACHY CO 2 retrieval in the presence of optically thin clouds

    M. Reuter;M. Buchwitz;O. Schneising;J. Heymann

  • Remote sensing of fugitive methane emissions from oil and gas production in North American tight geologic formations

    Oliver Schneising;John P. Burrows;John P. Burrows;Russell R. Dickerson;Michael Buchwitz

  • The Greenhouse Gas Climate Change Initiative (GHG-CCI): Comparison and quality assessment of near-surface-sensitive satellite-derived CO2 and CH4 global data sets

    M Buchwitz;Markus Reuter;O Schneising;Hartmut Boesch

  • Three years of greenhouse gas column-averaged dry air mole fractions retrieved from satellite – Part 1: Carbon dioxide

    O. Schneising;M. Buchwitz;J. Burrows;H. Bovensmann

  • Atmospheric carbon gases retrieved from SCIAMACHY by WFM-DOAS: version 0.5 CO and CH 4 and impact of calibration improvements on CO 2 retrieval

    M. Buchwitz;R. de Beek;S. Noël;J. P. Burrows

  • Retrieval of atmospheric CO2 with enhanced accuracy and precision from SCIAMACHY: validation with FTS measurements and comparison with model results

    M. Reuter;H. Bovensmann;M. Buchwitz;J. P. Burrows

  • Three years of greenhouse gas column-averaged dry air mole fractions retrieved from satellite - Part 2: Methane

    O. Schneising;M. Buchwitz;J. P. Burrows;H. Bovensmann

  • Carbon Monitoring Satellite (CarbonSat): assessment of atmospheric CO 2 and CH 4 retrieval errors by error parameterization

    M. Buchwitz;M. Reuter;H. Bovensmann;D. Pillai

  • First direct observation of the atmospheric CO 2 year-to-year increase from space

    M. Buchwitz;O. Schneising;J. P. Burrows;H. Bovensmann

  • Remote sensing of methane leakage from natural gas and petroleum systems revisited

    Oliver Schneising;Michael Buchwitz;Maximilian Reuter;Steffen Vanselow

  • Decreasing emissions of NO x relative to CO 2 in East Asia inferred from satellite observations

    M. Reuter;M. Buchwitz;A. Hilboll;A. Richter

  • A scientific algorithm to simultaneously retrieve carbon monoxide and methane from TROPOMI onboard Sentinel-5 Precursor

    Oliver Schneising;Michael Buchwitz;Maximilian Reuter;Heinrich Bovensmann

  • The greenhouse gas climate change initiative (GHG-CCI): Comparative validation of GHG-CCI SCIAMACHY/ENVISAT and TANSO-FTS/GOSAT CO2 and CH4 retrieval algorithm products with measurements from the TCCON

    B Dils;M Buchwitz;Markus Reuter;O Schneising

  • Anthropogenic carbon dioxide source areas observed from space: assessment of regional enhancements and trends

    O. Schneising;J. Heymann;M. Buchwitz;M. Reuter

  • Atmospheric greenhouse gases retrieved from SCIAMACHY: comparison to ground-based FTS measurements and model results

    O Schneising;p Bergamaschi;H Bovensmann;M Buchwitz

  • Satellite-derived methane hotspot emission estimates using a fast data-driven method

    Michael Buchwitz;Oliver Schneising;Maximilian Reuter;Jens Heymann

  • Satellite-inferred European carbon sink larger than expected

    M. Reuter;M. Buchwitz;M. Hilker;J. Heymann

  • Unexpected long-range transport of glyoxal and formaldehyde observed from the Copernicus Sentinel-5 Precursor satellite during the 2018 Canadian wildfires

    Leonardo M. A. Alvarado;Andreas Richter;Mihalis Vrekoussis;Mihalis Vrekoussis;Andreas Hilboll

  • Towards monitoring localized CO2 emissions from space: co-located regional CO2 and NO2 enhancements observed by the OCO-2 and S5P satellites

    Maximilian Reuter;Michael Buchwitz;Oliver Schneising;Sven Krautwurst

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Buchwitz
Michael Buchwitz University of Bremen
Heinrich Bovensmann
Heinrich Bovensmann University of Bremen
John P. Burrows
John P. Burrows University of Bremen
Justus Notholt
Justus Notholt University of Bremen
Thorsten Warneke
Thorsten Warneke University of Bremen
Otto Hasekamp
Otto Hasekamp Netherlands Institute for Space Research
Nicholas M. Deutscher
Nicholas M. Deutscher University of Wollongong
Robert J. Parker
Robert J. Parker University of Leicester
Hartmut Boesch
Hartmut Boesch University of Bremen
Ralf Sussmann
Ralf Sussmann Karlsruhe Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens the door to diverse career opportunities, many of which benefit from complementary online degrees. For instance, professionals interested in public policy and administration can explore top online MPA programs, which provide essential skills for managing environmental projects and influencing policy decisions.

Understanding social dynamics is also crucial in environmental work. Pursuing online sociology bachelor programs helps develop insights into community behavior and social impacts, enhancing an environmental scientist’s ability to create sustainable solutions with societal benefits.

For those aiming to transition into leadership or academic roles, advanced education degrees offer valuable pathways. Options such as edd without dissertation requirement allow professionals to earn their Doctor of Education degree efficiently, focusing on applied research without the traditional dissertation constraints.

Moreover, the best eds to edd programs provide a structured route from a Master's in Education to a doctoral degree, supporting environmental educators and advocates who want to deepen their expertise and academic credentials while balancing their careers.

These related degrees complement an Environmental Sciences background, equipping graduates with multidisciplinary skills to address complex environmental challenges and advance their careers.

Best Scientists Citing Oliver Schneising

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles