World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
69
Citations
16398
World Ranking
1801
National Ranking
53

Otto Hasekamp publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Otto Hasekamp sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 264 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Otto Hasekamp D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Otto Hasekamp sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Otto Hasekamp is affiliated with the Netherlands Institute for Space Research in the Netherlands and conducts research primarily in Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science. Their work spans several related subfields, including Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Aerospace Engineering, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, and Ecology.

The scientist's research focuses on various topics related to atmospheric processes and measurements. Key topics covered in their publications include:

  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Calibration and Measurement Techniques
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Remote Sensing in Agriculture

Otto Hasekamp's recent research contributions, published between 2020 and 2021, cover subjects such as methane retrieval from satellite data, aerosol optical properties, and satellite-based aerosol measurements. Notable papers include:

  • "Methane retrieved from TROPOMI: improvement of the data product and validation of the first 2 years of measurements" (2021), Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
  • "Constraining the Twomey effect from satellite observations: issues and perspectives" (2020), Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • "Aerosol retrievals from different polarimeters during the ACEPOL campaign using a common retrieval algorithm" (2020), Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
  • "AEROCOM and AEROSAT AAOD and SSA study - Part 01: Evaluation and intercomparison of satellite measurements" (2021), Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • "Assimilating aerosol optical properties related to size and absorption from POLDER/PARASOL with an ensemble data assimilation system" (2021), Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

Their work has been disseminated mainly through journals that focus on atmospheric and environmental sciences. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (17 publications)
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (7 publications)
  • Frontiers in Remote Sensing (3 publications)
  • International Conference on Space Optics - ICSO 2020 (3 publications)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (3 publications)

Collaboration plays an important role in Otto Hasekamp's research. They have frequent co-authors with whom they have published multiple papers, including:

  • Guangliang Fu (17 coauthored papers)
  • Brian Cairns (12 coauthored papers)
  • Jochen Landgraf (10 coauthored papers)
  • Kirk Knobelspiesse (9 coauthored papers)
  • Meng Gao (9 coauthored papers)

Best Publications

  • TROPOMI on the ESA Sentinel-5 Precursor: A GMES mission for global observations of the atmospheric composition for climate, air quality and ozone layer applications

    JP Veefkind;JP Veefkind;I Aben;K McMullan;H Forster

  • Toward accurate CO2 and CH4 observations from GOSAT

    A Butz;A Butz;S Guerlet;O Hasekamp;D Schepers

  • Polarimetric remote sensing of atmospheric aerosols: Instruments, methodologies, results, and perspectives

    Oleg Dubovik;Zhengqiang Li;Michael I. Mishchenko;Didier Tanré

  • The Plankton, Aerosol, Cloud, Ocean Ecosystem Mission: Status, Science, Advances

    P. Jeremy Werdell;Michael J. Behrenfeld;Paula S. Bontempi;Emmanuel Boss

  • Toward Global Mapping of Methane With TROPOMI: First Results and Intersatellite Comparison to GOSAT

    Haili Hu;Jochen Landgraf;Rob Detmers;Tobias Borsdorff

  • Global CO 2 fluxes estimated from GOSAT retrievals of total column CO 2

    S. Basu;S. Basu;S. Guerlet;A. Butz;S. Houweling;S. Houweling

  • Methane retrieved from TROPOMI: Improvement of the data product and validation of the first 2 years of measurements

    Alba Lorente;Tobias Borsdorff;Andre Butz;Otto Hasekamp

  • Retrieval of aerosol properties over land surfaces: capabilities of multiple-viewing-angle intensity and polarization measurements.

    Otto P. Hasekamp;Jochen Landgraf

  • Satellite observations reveal extreme methane leakage from a natural gas well blowout

    Sudhanshu Pandey;Sudhanshu Pandey;Ritesh Gautam;Sander Houweling;Sander Houweling;Hugo Denier Van Der Gon

  • Retrievals of atmospheric CO2 from simulated space-borne measurements of backscattered near-infrared sunlight: accounting for aerosol effects.

    André Butz;Otto P. Hasekamp;Christian Frankenberg;Ilse Aben

  • Aerosol properties over the ocean from PARASOL multiangle photopolarimetric measurements

    Otto P. Hasekamp;Pavel Litvinov;André Butz

  • China's coal mine methane regulations have not curbed growing emissions.

    Scot M. Miller;Scot M. Miller;Anna M. Michalak;Robert G. Detmers;Otto P. Hasekamp

  • Aerosol measurements by SPEXone on the NASA PACE mission: expected retrieval capabilities

    Otto P. Hasekamp;Guangliang Fu;Stephanie P. Rusli;Lianghai Wu

  • Methane retrievals from Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT) shortwave infrared measurements: Performance comparison of proxy and physics retrieval algorithms

    D. Schepers;S. Guerlet;A. Butz;J. Landgraf

  • The Greenhouse Gas Climate Change Initiative (GHG-CCI): Comparison and quality assessment of near-surface-sensitive satellite-derived CO2 and CH4 global data sets

    M Buchwitz;Markus Reuter;O Schneising;Hartmut Boesch

  • Atmospheric Correction of Satellite Ocean-Color Imagery During the PACE Era.

    Robert J. Frouin;Bryan A. Franz;Amir Ibrahim;Kirk Knobelspiesse

  • An intercomparison of inverse models for estimating sources and sinks of CO2 using GOSAT measurements

    S. Houweling;D. Baker;S. Basu;Hartmut Boesch

  • Inverse modelling of CH 4 emissions for 2010–2011 using different satellite retrieval products from GOSAT and SCIAMACHY

    M. Alexe;P. Bergamaschi;A. Segers;R. Detmers

  • Carbon monoxide total column retrievals from TROPOMI shortwave infrared measurements

    Jochen Landgraf;Joost aan de Brugh;Remco Scheepmaker;Tobias Borsdorff

  • Uncertainties in the space-based measurements of CO2 columns due to scattering in the Earth's atmosphere

    I. Aben;O. Hasekamp;W. Hartmann

  • Mapping atmospheric aerosols with a citizen science network of smartphone spectropolarimeters

    Frans Snik;Jeroen H. H. Rietjens;Arnoud Apituley;Hester Volten

  • Measuring Carbon Monoxide With TROPOMI: First Results and a Comparison With ECMWF‐IFS Analysis Data

    T. Borsdorff;J. Aan de Brugh;H. Hu;I. Aben

  • The operational methane retrieval algorithm for TROPOMI

    Haili Hu;Otto Hasekamp;André Butz;André Galli

  • Toward accurate CO_2 and CH_4 observations from GOSAT

    A. Butz;S. Guerlet;O. Hasekamp;D. Schepers

Frequent Co-Authors

Ilse Aben
Ilse Aben Netherlands Institute for Space Research
Christian Frankenberg
Christian Frankenberg California Institute of Technology
Brian Cairns
Brian Cairns Goddard Institute for Space Studies
Sander Houweling
Sander Houweling Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Nicholas M. Deutscher
Nicholas M. Deutscher University of Wollongong
Justus Notholt
Justus Notholt University of Bremen
Robert J. Parker
Robert J. Parker University of Leicester
Michael Buchwitz
Michael Buchwitz University of Bremen
Heinrich Bovensmann
Heinrich Bovensmann University of Bremen
Hartmut Boesch
Hartmut Boesch University of Bremen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those pursuing Environmental Sciences in the USA, exploring related online degrees can expand career opportunities and skill sets. Many professionals consider advanced education such as a Doctor of Education (EdD) without the traditional dissertation requirement. Programs featuring edd no dissertation offer a more flexible path for those balancing work and study while advancing their expertise.

Transitioning from a Master of Education (EdS) to a Doctor of Education (EdD) is also a common route for educators and administrators aiming to deepen their knowledge. The eds to edd bridge program provides a streamlined option for this educational progression.

For careers intersecting social work and environmental justice, online Doctorate in Social Work degrees (DSW) can be particularly relevant. These programs, including many affordable choices highlighted in the dsw programs online listings, offer advanced training in policy and community engagement.

Additionally, students seeking broad foundational knowledge may find value in exploring most affordable online general studies degree programs. These degrees provide versatile skills suitable for various environmental careers, especially for those looking to pivot or diversify their professional paths.

Best Scientists Citing Otto Hasekamp

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles