World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michael Buchwitz

Michael Buchwitz

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
60
Citations
15541
World Ranking
2887
National Ranking
193

Michael Buchwitz publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Buchwitz sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 264 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Michael Buchwitz D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Buchwitz sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael Buchwitz is affiliated with the University of Bremen in Germany and has contributed extensively to the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences. Their research primarily focuses on Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Environmental Chemistry, and Spectroscopy.

The scientist has a strong emphasis on topics related to Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, Atmospheric Ozone and Climate, Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations, Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis, Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena, and Climate variability and models.

Buchwitz has authored research published in several prominent scientific venues, with the most frequent publication outlets including:

  • Atmospheric measurement techniques
  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Frontiers in Remote Sensing
  • Remote Sensing

The scientist has participated in research collaborations with notable co-authors such as Maximilian Reuter, Oliver Schneising, H. Bovensmann, John P. Burrows, and Stefan Noël. These collaborations have resulted in multiple publications across various topics within atmospheric sciences.

Recent papers by Michael Buchwitz cover diverse aspects of atmospheric monitoring and gas dynamics, including:

  • "Toward an Operational Anthropogenic CO2 Emissions Monitoring and Verification Support Capacity," 2020, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • "Remote sensing of methane leakage from natural gas and petroleum systems revisited," 2020, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • "The CO2 Human Emissions (CHE) Project: First Steps Towards a European Operational Capacity to Monitor Anthropogenic CO2 Emissions," 2021, Frontiers in Remote Sensing
  • "Can a regional-scale reduction of atmospheric CO 2 during the COVID-19 pandemic be detected from space? A case study for East China using satellite XCO 2 retrievals," 2021, Atmospheric measurement techniques
  • "Technical note: The CAMS greenhouse gas reanalysis from 2003 to 2020," 2023, Atmospheric chemistry and physics

This body of work highlights a focus on satellite and remote sensing techniques for greenhouse gas monitoring, anthropogenic CO2 emissions, and methane leakage detection. The research often intersects with climate-related phenomena and efforts to enhance operational capacities for monitoring atmospheric gas changes at regional and global scales.

Best Publications

  • SCIAMACHY: Mission Objectives and Measurement Modes

    H. Bovensmann;J. P. Burrows;M. Buchwitz;J. Frerick

  • The Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment (GOME): Mission Concept and First Scientific Results

    John P. Burrows;Mark Weber;Michael Buchwitz;Vladimir Rozanov

  • The ESA Climate Change Initiative: Satellite Data Records for Essential Climate Variables

    R Hollmann;CJ Merchant;RA Saunders;C Downy

  • SCIATRAN 2.0 – A new radiative transfer model for geophysical applications in the 175–2400 nm spectral region

    A. Rozanov;V. Rozanov;M. Buchwitz;A. Kokhanovsky

  • A remote sensing technique for global monitoring of power plant CO 2 emissions from space and related applications

    H. Bovensmann;M. Buchwitz;J. P. Burrows;M. Reuter

  • Atmospheric methane and carbon dioxide from SCIAMACHY satellite data: initial comparison with chemistry and transport models

    M. Buchwitz;R. de Beek;J. Burrows;H. Bovensmann

  • Global Estimates of CO Sources with High Resolution by Adjoint Inversion of Multiple Satellite Datasets (MOPITT, AIRS, SCIAMACHY, TES)

    M. Kopacz;M. Kopacz;Daniel J. Jacob;John Fisher;Jennifer A. Logan

  • Current systematic carbon-cycle observations and the need for implementing a policy-relevant carbon observing system

    P. Ciais;A. J. Dolman;A. Bombelli;R. Duren

  • A near‐infrared optimized DOAS method for the fast global retrieval of atmospheric CH4, CO, CO2, H2O, and N2O total column amounts from SCIAMACHY Envisat‐1 nadir radiances

    Michael Buchwitz;Vladimir V. Rozanov;John P. Burrows

  • Carbon Monoxide, Methane and Carbon Dioxide Columns Retrieved from SCIAMACHY by WFM-DOAS: Year 2003 Initial Data Set

    M. Buchwitz;R. de Beek;S. Noël;J. P. Burrows

  • Towards monitoring localized CO 2 emissions from space: co-located regional CO 2 and NO 2 enhancements observed by the OCO-2 and S5P satellites

    Maximilian Reuter;Michael Buchwitz;Oliver Schneising;Sven Krautwurst

  • Long-term analysis of carbon dioxide and methane column-averaged mole fractions retrieved from SCIAMACHY

    O. Schneising;M. Buchwitz;M. Reuter;J. Heymann

  • Space‐based near‐infrared CO2 measurements: Testing the Orbiting Carbon Observatory retrieval algorithm and validation concept using SCIAMACHY observations over Park Falls, Wisconsin

    H. Bösch;G. C. Toon;B. Sen;R. A. Washenfelder

  • A method for improved SCIAMACHY CO 2 retrieval in the presence of optically thin clouds

    M. Reuter;M. Buchwitz;O. Schneising;J. Heymann

  • Remote sensing of fugitive methane emissions from oil and gas production in North American tight geologic formations

    Oliver Schneising;John P. Burrows;John P. Burrows;Russell R. Dickerson;Michael Buchwitz

  • The Greenhouse Gas Climate Change Initiative (GHG-CCI): Comparison and quality assessment of near-surface-sensitive satellite-derived CO2 and CH4 global data sets

    M Buchwitz;Markus Reuter;O Schneising;Hartmut Boesch

  • Three years of greenhouse gas column-averaged dry air mole fractions retrieved from satellite – Part 1: Carbon dioxide

    O. Schneising;M. Buchwitz;J. Burrows;H. Bovensmann

  • Atmospheric carbon gases retrieved from SCIAMACHY by WFM-DOAS: version 0.5 CO and CH 4 and impact of calibration improvements on CO 2 retrieval

    M. Buchwitz;R. de Beek;S. Noël;J. P. Burrows

  • Retrieval of atmospheric CO2 with enhanced accuracy and precision from SCIAMACHY: validation with FTS measurements and comparison with model results

    M. Reuter;H. Bovensmann;M. Buchwitz;J. P. Burrows

  • Comparison of Models Used for UV Index Calculations

    Peter Koepke;Alkiviadis Bais;Dimitrios Balis;Michael Buchwitz

  • Toward an operational anthropogenic CO2 emissions monitoring and verification support capacity

    G. Janssens-Maenhout;B. Pinty;M. Dowell;H. Zunker

  • The Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment (Gome) : Mission, instrument concept, and first scientific results

    J. P. Burrows;M. Buchwitz;V. Rozanov;M. Weber

Frequent Co-Authors

John P. Burrows
John P. Burrows University of Bremen
Heinrich Bovensmann
Heinrich Bovensmann University of Bremen
Oliver Schneising
Oliver Schneising University of Bremen
Justus Notholt
Justus Notholt University of Bremen
Thorsten Warneke
Thorsten Warneke University of Bremen
Ralf Sussmann
Ralf Sussmann Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Vladimir V. Rozanov
Vladimir V. Rozanov University of Bremen
Nicholas M. Deutscher
Nicholas M. Deutscher University of Wollongong
Christian Frankenberg
Christian Frankenberg California Institute of Technology
Otto Hasekamp
Otto Hasekamp Netherlands Institute for Space Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, online degrees offer flexible pathways to advance academic and professional goals. While this field primarily focuses on science and sustainability, many learners explore complementary programs. For instance, education professionals might consider online ed d programs without dissertation to enhance leadership skills in environmental education.

Those aiming for higher academic credentials can transition smoothly through best online eds to edd programs, which provide a structured progression from master's level to doctoral degrees. Additionally, professionals seeking to combine social work with environmental advocacy may find value in the cheapest online dsw programs, offering affordable pathways to make impactful community contributions.

For those uncertain about specialized majors, pursuing broad-based online options like the cheapest online general studies degree programs can provide a versatile foundation that complements environmental science knowledge.

Together, these diverse online programs support varied career trajectories—from education and social work to interdisciplinary environmental roles—highlighting the importance of accessible, affordable learning opportunities aligned with individual goals.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Buchwitz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles