World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 64 1635 1553 97 88 290 15879
Environmental Sciences 65 2190 2090 174 168 274 16340

Branko Bijeljic publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Branko Bijeljic between 1997 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Branko Bijeljic published across 30 years, from 1997 to 2026, averaging 10.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2017. 26 of the 304 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2017. 1997: 2 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 6 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 21 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 21 publications 2017: 27 publications 2018: 24 publications 2019: 24 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 17 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 25 publications 2026: 1 publication
1997 2026

304 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Branko Bijeljic: publications per year, 1997 to 2026
Year Publications
1997 2
1998 1
1999 0
2000 1
2001 2
2002 2
2003 2
2004 3
2005 1
2006 6
2007 4
2008 6
2009 4
2010 8
2011 8
2012 5
2013 13
2014 21
2015 19
2016 21
2017 27
2018 24
2019 24
2020 19
2021 17
2022 9
2023 17
2024 12
2025 25
2026 1
Total 304
Download as CSV

Branko Bijeljic publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Branko Bijeljic sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 288–297 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 290 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203 290
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Branko Bijeljic D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Branko Bijeljic sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118 64
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Branko Bijeljic is an academic affiliated with Imperial College London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily falls within the broad discipline of engineering, with a focus on several specialized subfields including ocean engineering, mechanics of materials, environmental engineering, mechanical engineering, and computational mechanics.

The scientist's work extensively covers topics related to enhanced oil recovery techniques and hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis. Further areas of focus include hydraulic fracturing and reservoir analysis, CO2 sequestration and geologic interactions, groundwater flow and contamination studies, as well as lattice Boltzmann simulation studies and NMR spectroscopy applications.

Branko Bijeljic has contributed to multiple publications within prominent scientific venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Transport in Porous Media
  • Advances in Water Resources
  • Water Resources Research
  • Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
  • Physical review. E

Several recent papers by this scientist illustrate their research focus. These include:

  • "Pore-scale X-ray imaging with measurement of relative permeability, capillary pressure and oil recovery in a mixed-wet micro-porous carbonate reservoir rock" (2020), Fuel
  • "Pore-scale numerical simulation of low salinity water flooding using the lattice Boltzmann method" (2020), Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
  • "Pore-scale dynamics and the multiphase Darcy law" (2020), Physical Review Fluids
  • "Pore-Scale Observations of Hydrogen Trapping and Migration in Porous Rock: Demonstrating the Effect of Ostwald Ripening" (2023), Geophysical Research Letters
  • "Pore-Scale Imaging and Analysis of Wettability Order, Trapping and Displacement in Three-Phase Flow in Porous Media with Various Wettabilities" (2021), Transport in Porous Media

In their collaborative work, Branko Bijeljic has frequently co-authored with researchers such as Martin J. Blunt, Sajjad Foroughi, Qingyang Lin, Abdulla Alhosani, and Ali Q. Raeini.

Best Publications

  • Pore-scale imaging and modelling

    Martin J. Blunt;Branko Bijeljic;Hu Dong;Oussama Gharbi

  • Modelling two-phase flow in porous media at the pore scale using the volume-of-fluid method

    Ali Q. Raeini;Martin J. Blunt;Branko Bijeljic

  • Mixing, spreading and reaction in heterogeneous media: a brief review.

    Marco Dentz;Tanguy Le Borgne;Andreas Englert;Branko Bijeljic

  • Computations of Absolute Permeability on Micro-CT Images

    Peyman Mostaghimi;Martin J. Blunt;Branko Bijeljic

  • Pore-scale contact angle measurements at reservoir conditions using X-ray microtomography

    Matthew Andrew;Branko Bijeljic;Martin J. Blunt

  • Direct simulations of two-phase flow on micro-CT images of porous media and upscaling of pore-scale forces

    Ali Q. Raeini;Martin J. Blunt;Branko Bijeljic

  • Generalized network modeling: Network extraction as a coarse-scale discretization of the void space of porous media.

    Ali Q. Raeini;Branko Bijeljic;Martin J. Blunt

  • Multi-scale multi-dimensional microstructure imaging of oil shale pyrolysis using X-ray micro-tomography, automated ultra-high resolution SEM, MAPS Mineralogy and FIB-SEM

    Tarik Saif;Qingyang Lin;Alan R. Butcher;Branko Bijeljic

  • Predictions of non-Fickian solute transport in different classes of porous media using direct simulation on pore-scale images

    Branko Bijeljic;Ali Raeini;Peyman Mostaghimi;Martin J. Blunt

  • Signature of non-Fickian solute transport in complex heterogeneous porous media.

    Branko Bijeljic;Peyman Mostaghimi;Martin J. Blunt

  • Pore-scale imaging of trapped supercritical carbon dioxide in sandstones and carbonates

    Matthew Andrew;Branko Bijeljic;Martin J. Blunt

  • Dynamics of snap-off and pore-filling events during two-phase fluid flow in permeable media.

    Kamaljit Singh;Hannah Menke;Matthew Andrew;Matthew Andrew;Qingyang Lin

  • Pore-scale modeling and continuous time random walk analysis of dispersion in porous media

    Branko Bijeljic;Martin J. Blunt

  • Pore‐scale modeling of longitudinal dispersion

    Branko Bijeljic;Ann H. Muggeridge;Martin J. Blunt

  • Dynamic three-dimensional pore-scale imaging of reaction in a carbonate at reservoir conditions.

    Hannah P. Menke;Branko Bijeljic;Matthew G. Andrew;Martin J. Blunt

  • The impact of porous media heterogeneity on non-Darcy flow behaviour from pore-scale simulation

    Bagus P. Muljadi;Martin J. Blunt;Ali Q. Raeini;Branko Bijeljic

  • Automatic measurement of contact angle in pore-space images

    Ahmed AlRatrout;Ali Q Raeini;Branko Bijeljic;Martin J Blunt

  • Wettability in complex porous materials, the mixed-wet state, and its relationship to surface roughness.

    Ahmed AlRatrout;Martin J. Blunt;Branko Bijeljic

  • In situ characterization of mixed-wettability in a reservoir rock at subsurface conditions.

    Amer M. Alhammadi;Ahmed AlRatrout;Kamaljit Singh;Branko Bijeljic

  • The Imaging of Dynamic Multiphase Fluid Flow Using Synchrotron-Based X-ray Microtomography at Reservoir Conditions

    Matthew Andrew;Hannah Menke;Martin J. Blunt;Branko Bijeljic

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin J. Blunt
Martin J. Blunt Imperial College London
Peyman Mostaghimi
Peyman Mostaghimi University of New South Wales
Stefan Iglauer
Stefan Iglauer Edith Cowan University
Wolfgang Nowak
Wolfgang Nowak University of Stuttgart
Lynn F. Gladden
Lynn F. Gladden University of Cambridge
Samuel Krevor
Samuel Krevor Imperial College London
Andrew J. Sederman
Andrew J. Sederman University of Cambridge
Steffen Berg
Steffen Berg Shell (Netherlands)
Alberto Guadagnini
Alberto Guadagnini Polytechnic University of Milan
Diogo Bolster
Diogo Bolster University of Notre Dame

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Engineering and Technology studies in the USA opens up a range of flexible pathways. Many students are now considering certificate programs that pay well, allowing them to quickly gain specialized skills and break into high-demand tech fields without committing to a lengthy degree.

For those balancing family responsibilities, options like online school for moms make it possible to pursue engineering or technology credentials from home at your own pace. Flexibility is key, and accelerated options such as 6 week certification programs can fast-track your entry into a rewarding career.

Engineering and technology skills also complement many other fields, including business. Those interested in combining technical know-how with financial savvy may explore an online finance degree to open doors in finance, tech management, and more. Online learning enables you to choose a pathway that fits your goals and lifestyle.

Best Scientists Citing Branko Bijeljic

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles