World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 52 3643 3489 196 192 210 9781
Earth Science 47 3985 3657 209 195 170 8893

Peyman Mostaghimi publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peyman Mostaghimi between 2010 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peyman Mostaghimi published across 17 years, from 2010 to 2026, averaging 13.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 32 publications in 2023. 28 of the 231 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2010 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 32. Peak 32 publications in 2023. 2010: 2 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 22 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 20 publications 2020: 20 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 27 publications 2023: 32 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 21 publications 2026: 7 publications
2010 2026

231 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peyman Mostaghimi: publications per year, 2010 to 2026
Year Publications
2010 2
2011 2
2012 5
2013 6
2014 3
2015 8
2016 11
2017 22
2018 11
2019 20
2020 20
2021 23
2022 27
2023 32
2024 11
2025 21
2026 7
Total 231
Download as CSV

Peyman Mostaghimi publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peyman Mostaghimi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 208–217 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 210 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317 210
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Peyman Mostaghimi D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peyman Mostaghimi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213 52
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Peyman Mostaghimi is affiliated with the University of New South Wales in Australia. Their research focuses predominantly within the field of engineering, with particular attention to ocean engineering, mechanics of materials, mechanical engineering, environmental engineering, and geophysics.

Their main areas of investigation include enhanced oil recovery techniques, hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis, hydraulic fracturing and reservoir analysis, coal properties and utilization, seismic imaging and inversion techniques, groundwater flow and contamination studies, and mineral processing and grinding.

Mostaghimi has published frequently in several academic venues. The most common publication outlets are arXiv (Cornell University) with 12 publications, Fuel with 7, Water Resources Research with 7, Transport in Porous Media with 7, and SSRN Electronic Journal with 6 publications.

Their recent publications include:

  • Deep learning in pore scale imaging and modeling, 2021, Earth-Science Reviews
  • In-situ hydrogen wettability characterisation for underground hydrogen storage, 2022, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
  • Automated lithology classification from drill core images using convolutional neural networks, 2020, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering
  • Large-scale physically accurate modelling of real proton exchange membrane fuel cell with deep learning, 2023, Nature Communications
  • Liquid metal synthesis solvents for metallic crystals, 2022, Science

Frequent collaborators in their work include Ryan T. Armstrong, Ying Da Wang, Kunning Tang, James E. McClure, and Yufu Niu. Collaboration counts range, with Ryan T. Armstrong appearing as a coauthor on 98 publications and Ying Da Wang on 42 publications.

Best Publications

  • Pore-scale imaging and modelling

    Martin J. Blunt;Branko Bijeljic;Hu Dong;Oussama Gharbi

  • Computations of Absolute Permeability on Micro-CT Images

    Peyman Mostaghimi;Martin J. Blunt;Branko Bijeljic

  • Predictions of non-Fickian solute transport in different classes of porous media using direct simulation on pore-scale images

    Branko Bijeljic;Ali Raeini;Peyman Mostaghimi;Martin J. Blunt

  • Signature of non-Fickian solute transport in complex heterogeneous porous media.

    Branko Bijeljic;Peyman Mostaghimi;Martin J. Blunt

  • Porosity and permeability characterization of coal: A micro-computed tomography study

    Hamed Lamei Ramandi;Peyman Mostaghimi;Ryan T. Armstrong;Mohammad Saadatfar

  • Deep learning in pore scale imaging and modeling

    Ying Da Wang;Martin J. Blunt;Ryan T. Armstrong;Peyman Mostaghimi

  • In-situ hydrogen wettability characterisation for underground hydrogen storage

    Unknown

  • Insights into non-Fickian solute transport in carbonates.

    Branko Bijeljic;Peyman Mostaghimi;Martin J. Blunt

  • Simulation of Flow and Dispersion on Pore-Space Images

    Peyman Mostaghimi;Branko Bijeljic;Martin J. Blunt

  • Liquid metal synthesis solvents for metallic crystals

    Unknown

  • Large-scale physically accurate modelling of real proton exchange membrane fuel cell with deep learning

    Unknown

  • Cleat-scale characterisation of coal: An overview

    Peyman Mostaghimi;Ryan T. Armstrong;Alireza Gerami;Yibing Hu

  • Automated lithology classification from drill core images using convolutional neural networks

    Fatimah Alzubaidi;Peyman Mostaghimi;Pawel Swietojanski;Stuart R. Clark

  • Machine learning for predicting properties of porous media from 2d X-ray images

    Naif Alqahtani;Fatimah Alzubaidi;Ryan T. Armstrong;Pawel Swietojanski

  • Coal cleat reconstruction using micro-computed tomography imaging

    Yu Jing;Ryan T. Armstrong;Hamed Lamei Ramandi;Peyman Mostaghimi

  • Enhancing Resolution of Digital Rock Images with Super Resolution Convolutional Neural Networks

    Ying Da Wang;Ryan T. Armstrong;Peyman Mostaghimi

  • Deep neural networks for improving physical accuracy of 2D and 3D multi-mineral segmentation of rock micro-CT images

    Ying Da Wang;Mehdi Shabaninejad;Ryan T. Armstrong;Peyman Mostaghimi

  • Rough-walled discrete fracture network modelling for coal characterisation

    Yu Jing;Ryan T. Armstrong;Peyman Mostaghimi

  • Reservoir Modeling for Flow Simulation by Use of Surfaces, Adaptive Unstructured Meshes, and an Overlapping-Control-Volume Finite-Element Method

    Matthew D. Jackson;James R. Percival;Peyman Mostaghimi;Brendan Tollit

  • Numerical Simulation of Reactive Transport on Micro-CT Images

    Peyman Mostaghimi;Min Liu;Christoph H. Arns

  • Impact of mineralogical heterogeneity on reactive transport modelling

    Min Liu;Mehdi Shabaninejad;Peyman Mostaghimi

  • Digital rock analysis for accurate prediction of fractured media permeability

    Hamed Lamei Ramandi;Peyman Mostaghimi;Ryan T. Armstrong

  • High-resolution pore-scale simulation of dissolution in porous media

    Min Liu;Peyman Mostaghimi

Frequent Co-Authors

Ryan T. Armstrong
Ryan T. Armstrong University of New South Wales
Martin J. Blunt
Martin J. Blunt Imperial College London
Christopher C. Pain
Christopher C. Pain Imperial College London
Steffen Berg
Steffen Berg Shell (Netherlands)
Branko Bijeljic
Branko Bijeljic Imperial College London
Matthew D. Jackson
Matthew D. Jackson Imperial College London
Klaus Regenauer-Lieb
Klaus Regenauer-Lieb University of New South Wales
Majid Ebrahimi Warkiani
Majid Ebrahimi Warkiani University of Technology Sydney
Stefan Iglauer
Stefan Iglauer Edith Cowan University
Christoph H. Arns
Christoph H. Arns University of New South Wales

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Engineering and Technology can open doors to a wide range of industries and career options. However, to broaden your skill set and boost your career prospects, consider exploring supplementary online programs related to business and administration.

For those interested in foundational financial skills, enrolling in a bookkeeping course can provide essential expertise in managing organizational finances—a valuable asset in tech-driven workplaces. Similarly, office administration classes equip students with practical knowledge for supporting business operations and effective office management.

A more comprehensive credential, such as an online BA business administration, can prepare engineering graduates for leadership positions or interdisciplinary roles, where both technical and managerial skills are essential. Those looking to advance their leadership abilities might consider the cheapest online master's in organizational leadership, which focuses on cultivating strategic thinking and people management—key qualities for technological innovation and team success.

Exploring these related online pathways can enhance your career flexibility and help you stand out in today’s competitive job market.

Best Scientists Citing Peyman Mostaghimi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles