World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 47 4900 4715 325 305 160 8032

Edo S. Boek publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Edo S. Boek between 1985 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Edo S. Boek published across 42 years, from 1985 to 2026, averaging 4 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2012. 4 of the 169 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2012. 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 3 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 4 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 6 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 3 publications 2026: 1 publication
1985 2026

169 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Edo S. Boek: publications per year, 1985 to 2026
Year Publications
1985 1
1986 1
1987 0
1988 0
1989 2
1990 3
1991 3
1992 1
1993 3
1994 1
1995 4
1996 2
1997 2
1998 1
1999 1
2000 3
2001 2
2002 5
2003 3
2004 5
2005 3
2006 3
2007 2
2008 6
2009 6
2010 5
2011 6
2012 13
2013 13
2014 9
2015 4
2016 12
2017 11
2018 4
2019 3
2020 4
2021 10
2022 1
2023 6
2024 1
2025 3
2026 1
Total 169
Download as CSV

Edo S. Boek publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edo S. Boek sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 158–167 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 160 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415 160
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Edo S. Boek D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edo S. Boek sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306 47
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Edo S. Boek is affiliated with Queen Mary University of London in the United Kingdom. The primary field of research is Engineering, with a focus on various subfields including Computational Mechanics, Ocean Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Water Science and Technology, and Materials Chemistry.

The scientist's research covers multiple topics, notably:

  • Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
  • Granular flow and fluidized beds
  • Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies
  • Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
  • Drilling and Well Engineering
  • Heat and Mass Transfer in Porous Media
  • Groundwater flow and contamination studies

Frequent coauthors collaborating on research include:

  • O.J.I. Kramer
  • Johan T. Padding
  • P.J. de Moel
  • Jan Peter van der Hoek
  • E.T. Baars

Common publication venues for Edo S. Boek's work are:

  • Journal of Water Process Engineering
  • The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
  • Fuel
  • Geoenergy Science and Engineering
  • International Journal of Multiphase Flow

Selected recent papers include:

  • Benchmarking of Molecular Dynamics Force Fields for Solid-Liquid and Solid-Solid Phase Transitions in Alkanes, 2021, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
  • Improvement of voidage prediction in liquid-solid fluidized beds by inclusion of the Froude number in effective drag relations, 2020, International Journal of Multiphase Flow
  • Pore-Scale Modeling of Drainage Displacement Patterns in Association With Geological Sequestration of CO2, 2020, Water Resources Research
  • New hydraulic insights into rapid sand filter bed backwashing using the Carman-Kozeny model, 2021, Water Research
  • Accurate voidage prediction in fluidisation systems for full-scale drinking water pellet softening reactors using data driven models, 2020, Journal of Water Process Engineering

Best Publications

  • Monte Carlo Molecular Modeling Studies of Hydrated Li-, Na-, and K-Smectites: Understanding the Role of Potassium as a Clay Swelling Inhibitor

    E. S. Boek;P. V. Coveney;N. T. Skipper

  • Simulating the rheology of dense colloidal suspensions using dissipative particle dynamics

    E.S. Boek;P.V. Coveney;H.N.W. Lekkerkerker;P.P.A.M. van der Schoot

  • Lattice-Boltzmann studies of fluid flow in porous media with realistic rock geometries

    Edo S. Boek;Maddalena Venturoli

  • Quantitative Molecular Representation of Asphaltenes and Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Their Aggregation

    Edo S. Boek;Dmitry S. Yakovlev;Thomas F. Headen

  • Molecular Modeling of Clay Hydration: A Study of Hysteresis Loops in the Swelling Curves of Sodium Montmorillonites

    E. S. Boek;P. V. Coveney;N. T. Skipper

  • Evidence for Asphaltene Nanoaggregation in Toluene and Heptane from Molecular Dynamics Simulations

    Thomas F. Headen;Edo S. Boek;Neal T. Skipper

  • Prediction of Crystal-Growth Morphology Based on Structural-Analysis of the Solid-Fluid Interface

    X.Y. Liu;E.S. Boek;W.J. Briels;P. Bennema

  • Simulation of Asphaltene Aggregation through Molecular Dynamics: Insights and Limitations

    T. F. Headen;T. F. Headen;E. S. Boek;E. S. Boek;G. Jackson;T. S. Totton

  • Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Asphaltenes at the Oil–Water Interface: From Nanoaggregation to Thin-Film Formation

    Yohei Mikami;Yunfeng Liang;Toshifumi Matsuoka;Edo S. Boek

  • Interfacial Tension of (Brines + CO2): (0.864 NaCl + 0.136 KCl) at Temperatures between (298 and 448) K, Pressures between (2 and 50) MPa, and Total Molalities of (1 to 5) mol·kg–1

    Xuesong Li;Edo Boek;Geoffrey C. Maitland;J. P. Martin Trusler

  • Micro-computed tomography pore-scale study of flow in porous media: Effect of voxel resolution

    S.M. Shah;F. Gray;J.P. Crawshaw;E.S. Boek

  • Computer simulation of rheological phenomena in dense colloidal suspensions with dissipative particle dynamics

    E S Boek;P V Coveney;H N W Lekkerkerker

  • A comparison study of multi-component Lattice Boltzmann models for flow in porous media applications

    Jianhui Yang;Edo S. Boek

  • Particulate Invasion From Drilling Fluids

    Louise Bailey;E.S. Boek;S.D.M. Jacques;Tony Boassen

  • Spontaneous imbibition in nanopores of different roughness and wettability.

    Mikhail R. Stukan;Patrice Ligneul;John P. Crawshaw;Edo S. Boek

  • Interfacial Tension of (Brines+CO2): CaCl2(aq), MgCl2(aq), and Na2SO4(aq) at Temperatures between (343 and 423) K, Pressures between (2 and 50) MPa, and Molalities of (0.5 to 5) mol.kg-1

    X Li;ES Boek;GC Maitland;Jpm Trusler

  • LATTICE BOLTZMANN SIMULATION OF THE FLOW OF NON-NEWTONIAN FLUIDS IN POROUS MEDIA

    Edo S. Boek;Jonathan Chin;Peter V. Coveney

  • Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Study of the Hydration of a Sodium Smectite Clay

    E. S. Boek;M. Sprik

  • Molecular Dynamics Simulations of CO2 and Brine Interfacial Tension at High Temperatures and Pressures

    Xuesong Li;Daniel A. Ross;J. P. Martin Trusler;Geoffrey C. Maitland

  • Lattice Boltzmann simulation of the flow of binary immiscible fluids with different viscosities using the Shan-Chen microscopic interaction model.

    Jonathan Chin;Edo S Boek;Peter V Coveney

  • Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Asphaltene Aggregation in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide with and without Limonene

    Thomas F. Headen;Edo S. Boek

Frequent Co-Authors

JT Johan Padding
JT Johan Padding Delft University of Technology
Peter V. Coveney
Peter V. Coveney University College London
Geoffrey C. Maitland
Geoffrey C. Maitland Imperial College London
Michiel Sprik
Michiel Sprik University of Cambridge
J. P. Martin Trusler
J. P. Martin Trusler Imperial College London
Neal T. Skipper
Neal T. Skipper University College London
Henk N. W. Lekkerkerker
Henk N. W. Lekkerkerker Utrecht University
Branko Bijeljic
Branko Bijeljic Imperial College London
Xiang-Yang Liu
Xiang-Yang Liu Xiamen University
Berend Smit
Berend Smit École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can open new doors in the fields of engineering and technology. Many students and professionals are now considering flexible options, such as a masters in organizational leadership online, to sharpen leadership skills essential for technical project management and team coordination.

For those drawn to the operational side of tech businesses, an online mba in operations management programs can provide a competitive edge. These programs blend core business principles with operations know-how, preparing graduates for roles in supply chain, manufacturing, and technology management.

There’s also increased demand for more accessible applications. Students with strong technical backgrounds can expand their business acumen with an no gmat online mba, which removes common testing barriers and helps streamline the application process.

Affordability remains a big concern for many. Fortunately, prospective students can find high-quality options below the national average price point by exploring an mba under 35k.

Combining technical expertise with advanced leadership skills from online degrees can dramatically expand career pathways across the engineering and technology landscape in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Edo S. Boek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles