World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 44 5819 5611 371 351 230 7459

Andrew J. Sederman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Andrew J. Sederman between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Andrew J. Sederman published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 8.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2007. 7 of the 244 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2007. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 8 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 23 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 2 publications
1996 2025

244 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Andrew J. Sederman: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 1
1998 2
1999 0
2000 1
2001 8
2002 3
2003 10
2004 7
2005 13
2006 10
2007 23
2008 14
2009 10
2010 10
2011 8
2012 12
2013 7
2014 5
2015 7
2016 16
2017 15
2018 11
2019 13
2020 3
2021 8
2022 10
2023 9
2024 5
2025 2
Total 244
Download as CSV

Andrew J. Sederman publications per year - data summary

  • Andrew J. Sederman, a Engineering and Technology scholar from University of Cambridge, has 244 publications recorded across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1996 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2007, with 23 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1996, 1997 and 2000, with 1 publication each.
  • 1 of the 30 years in the span carries no publications at all (1999).
  • The rate of publication averages 8.1 papers per year over the whole span, or 8.4 per year counting only the 29 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 34 publications, 14% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1996-2005: 46 publications (4.6 per year); 2006-2015: 106 publications (10.6 per year); 2016-2025: 92 publications (9.2 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Andrew J. Sederman publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew J. Sederman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 228–237 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 230 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321 230
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Andrew J. Sederman publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 9,796 Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 78 ranges running from 38–47 to 804+ publications.
  • Andrew J. Sederman, a Engineering and Technology scholar from University of Cambridge, records 230 publications - the 58th percentile of the discipline.
  • 58% of ranked Engineering and Technology scientists score the same or lower than Andrew J. Sederman, and about 42% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 198–207 publications range, and Andrew J. Sederman ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 148–157 publications, holding 457 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 61% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 228–237 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 804 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Andrew J. Sederman D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew J. Sederman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310 44
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Andrew J. Sederman D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 9,796 Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 78 ranges running from 30 to 107+ D-Index.
  • Andrew J. Sederman, a Engineering and Technology scholar from University of Cambridge, records 44 D-Index - the 42nd percentile of the discipline.
  • 42% of ranked Engineering and Technology scientists score the same or lower than Andrew J. Sederman, and about 58% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 47 D-Index range, and Andrew J. Sederman ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 426 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 49 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more, 99 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Andrew J. Sederman is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on Physics and Astronomy, Engineering, and Medicine. Within these areas, their work extensively covers Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Spectroscopy, Computational Mechanics, and Mechanics of Materials.

The scientist's research primarily addresses topics related to NMR spectroscopy and applications, with a strong emphasis on advanced NMR and MRI techniques. Other notable topics include advanced neuroimaging, lattice Boltzmann simulation studies, seismic imaging and inversion techniques, and hydraulic fracturing and reservoir analysis.

Frequent co-authors with whom Sederman has collaborated include Lynn F. Gladden, Mick D. Mantle, Scott V. Elgersma, Constant M. Guédon, and Michael D. Mantle. These collaborations suggest extensive work in interdisciplinary teams, contributing to a broad range of sciences.

Their recent notable papers are:

  • Operando magnetic resonance imaging of product distributions within the pores of catalyst pellets during Fischer-Tropsch synthesis, 2023, Nature Catalysis
  • Molecular Dynamics of Ionic Liquids from Fast-Field Cycling NMR and Molecular Dynamics Simulations, 2022, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
  • Characterizing Solid-Liquid Interactions in a Mesoporous Catalyst Support Using Variable-Temperature Fast Field Cycling NMR, 2021, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
  • Joint reconstruction and segmentation of noisy velocity images as an inverse Navier-Stokes problem, 2022, Journal of Fluid Mechanics
  • Magnetic resonance velocity imaging of turbulent gas flow in a packed bed of catalyst support pellets, 2023, Chemical Engineering Journal

Research outputs have appeared frequently in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, Chemical Engineering Journal, and Analytical Chemistry. This diversity in publication venues underscores a multidisciplinary research portfolio.

Best Publications

  • Determination and Characterization of the Structure of a Pore Space from 3D Volume Images

    Christopher A. Baldwin;Andrew J. Sederman;Michael D. Mantle;Paul Alexander

  • Granular temperature: Comparison of Magnetic Resonance measurements with Discrete Element Model simulations

    Christoph R. Müller;Daniel J. Holland;Andrew J. Sederman;Stuart A. Scott

  • Three-Dimensional Morphology of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles with Reactive Concave Surfaces. A Compressed Sensing-Electron Tomography (CS-ET) Approach

    Zineb Saghi;Daniel J. Holland;Rowan Leary;Andrea Falqui

  • Structure of packed beds probed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    A.J Sederman;P Alexander;L.F Gladden

  • Magnetic resonance imaging of liquid flow and pore structure within packed beds

    A.J. Sederman;M.L. Johns;A.S. Bramley;P. Alexander

  • Structure-flow correlations in packed beds

    A.J. Sederman;M.L. Johns;P. Alexander;L.F. Gladden

  • Single- and two-phase flow in fixed-bed reactors: MRI flow visualisation and lattice-Boltzmann simulations

    M.D. Mantle;A.J. Sederman;L.F. Gladden

  • Magnetic resonance imaging as a quantitative probe of gas–liquid distribution and wetting efficiency in trickle-bed reactors

    A.J. Sederman;L.F. Gladden

  • Investigation of Void Fraction Schemes for Use with CFD-DEM Simulations of Fluidized Beds

    Daniel A. Clarke;Andrew J. Sederman;Lynn F. Gladden;Daniel J. Holland

  • Validation of a discrete element model using magnetic resonance measurements

    Christoph R. Müller;Stuart A. Scott;Daniel J. Holland;Belinda C. Clarke

  • Recent advances in Flow MRI

    Lynn F. Gladden;Andrew J. Sederman

  • MRI visualisation of two-phase flow in structured supports and trickle-bed reactors

    L.F. Gladden;M.H.M. Lim;M.D. Mantle;A.J. Sederman

  • Dynamic MRI in chemical process and reaction engineering

    M.D. Mantle;A.J. Sederman

  • Kinetic studies of CO2 methanation over a Ni/γ-Al2O3 catalyst using a batch reactor

    Jin Yang Lim;J McGregor;Andy Sederman;John Dennis

  • MRI technique for measurement of velocity vectors, acceleration, and autocorrelation functions in turbulent flow

    Andrew J Sederman;Mick D Mantle;Craig Buckley;Lynn F Gladden

  • Reducing data acquisition times in phase-encoded velocity imaging using compressed sensing.

    D.J. Holland;D.M. Malioutov;A. Blake;A.J. Sederman

  • Local transitions in flow phenomena through packed beds identified by MRI

    M. L. Johns;A. J. Sederman;A. S. Bramley;L. F. Gladden

  • Magnetic resonance velocity imaging of liquid and gas two-phase flow in packed beds

    M.H. Sankey;D.J. Holland;A.J. Sederman;L.F. Gladden

  • Dynamic MRI visualization of two‐phase flow in a ceramic monolith

    M. D. Mantle;A. J. Sederman;L. F. Gladden;S. Raymahasay

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging of fluidized beds

    C.R. Müller;D.J. Holland;A.J. Sederman;M.D. Mantle

  • Real-time measurement of bubbling phenomena in a three-dimensional gas-fluidized bed using ultrafast magnetic resonance imaging.

    C. R. Müller;J. F. Davidson;J. S. Dennis;P. S. Fennell

Frequent Co-Authors

Lynn F. Gladden
Lynn F. Gladden University of Cambridge
Michael L. Johns
Michael L. Johns University of Western Australia
John S. Dennis
John S. Dennis University of Cambridge
John F. Davidson
John F. Davidson University of Cambridge
Allan N. Hayhurst
Allan N. Hayhurst University of Cambridge
Branko Bijeljic
Branko Bijeljic Imperial College London
Susan T.L. Harrison
Susan T.L. Harrison University of Cape Town
Andrew Blake
Andrew Blake University of Cambridge
Paul S. Fennell
Paul S. Fennell Imperial College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Engineering and Technology students in the USA have access to a wide variety of online degrees, helping them expand their career opportunities beyond traditional fields. For example, many tech-focused professionals enhance their skills with advanced business education. One popular route is the cheapest online aacsb mba, which blends technical expertise with essential management skills.

Technology is transforming every sector, including marketing. Earning a social media marketing online degree allows grads to leverage engineering knowledge in digital strategies, analytics, and communications.

If you enjoy applying engineering and problem-solving skills in fast-paced industries, consider diversifying with a hotel and restaurant management degree online. This can lead to rewarding jobs in hospitality tech or operations.

For those interested in legal fields, there is growing demand for technology specialists in law. Explore your options with aba-approved paralegal programs that offer flexible online learning suited to tech-savvy students.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew J. Sederman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles