World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
40
Citations
6611
World Ranking
8254
National Ranking
818

Rosemarie McCabe publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rosemarie McCabe sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 104 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Rosemarie McCabe D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rosemarie McCabe sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • The Therapeutic Relationship in the Treatment of Severe Mental Illness: A Review of Methods and Findings:

    Rosemarie McCabe;Stefan Priebe

  • A new scale to assess the therapeutic relationship in community mental health care: STAR

    Rebecca McGuire-Snieckus;Rosemarie McCabe;Jocelyn Catty;Lars Hansson

  • Explanatory models of illness in schizophrenia: comparison of four ethnic groups

    Rosemarie McCabe;Stefan Priebe

  • Engagement of patients with psychosis in the consultation: conversation analytic study.

    Rosemarie McCabe;Christian Heath;Tom Burns;Stefan Priebe

  • Structured patient–clinician communication and 1-year outcome in community mental healthcare: Cluster randomised controlled trial

    Stefan Priebe;Rosemarie McCabe;Jens Bullenkamp;Lars Hansson

  • Does the Therapeutic Relationship Predict Outcomes of Psychiatric Treatment in Patients with Psychosis? A Systematic Review

    Stefan Priebe;Michelle Richardson;Maire Cooney;Oluwatoyin Adedeji

  • Therapeutic relationships in psychiatry: the basis of therapy or therapy in itself?

    Stefan Priebe;Rosemarie Mccabe

  • Psychiatric patients' views on why their involuntary hospitalisation was right or wrong: a qualitative study.

    Christina Katsakou;Diana Rose;Tim Amos;Len Bowers

  • The Therapeutic Relationship and Adherence to Antipsychotic Medication in Schizophrenia

    Rosemarie McCabe;Jens Bullenkamp;Lars Hansson;Christoph Lauber

  • The therapeutic relationship in psychiatric settings.

    S. Priebe;R. McCabe

  • Patient-reported outcomes in schizophrenia.

    Rosemarie McCabe;Marya Saidi;Stefan Priebe

  • Is Nonverbal Communication Disrupted in Interactions Involving Patients With Schizophrenia

    Mary Lavelle;Patrick G.T. Healey;Rosemarie McCabe

  • Miscommunication in Doctor-Patient Communication.

    Rosemarie McCabe;Patrick G. T. Healey

  • Factors influencing subjective quality of life in patients with schizophrenia and other mental disorders: A pooled analysis

    Stefan Priebe;Ulrich Reininghaus;Rosemarie McCabe;Tom Burns

  • Identifying change processes in group-based health behaviour-change interventions: development of the mechanisms of action in group-based interventions (MAGI) framework

    Aleksandra J Borek;Charles Abraham;Colin J Greaves;Fiona Gillison

  • Do people with schizophrenia display theory of mind deficits in clinical interactions

    R. McCabe;Ivan Leudar;C. Antaki

  • Good communication in psychiatry--a conceptual review.

    S. Priebe;S. Dimic;C. Wildgrube;J. Jankovic

  • Are day hospitals effective for acutely ill psychiatric patients? A European multicenter randomized controlled trial.

    Thomas W. Kallert;Stefan Priebe;Rosemarie Mccabe;Andrzej Kiejna

  • The Effectiveness of a Patient-Centred Assessment with a Solution-Focused Approach (DIALOG+) for Patients with Psychosis: A Pragmatic Cluster-Randomised Controlled Trial in Community Care

    Stefan Priebe;Lauren Kelley;Serif Omer;Eoin Golden

  • Therapeutic relationships and quality of life: association of two subjective constructs in schizophrenia patients.

    Rosemarie McCabe;Ute-Ulrike Röder-Wanner;Karin Hoffmann;Stefan Priebe

  • Association between symptoms and quality of life in patients with schizophrenia: A pooled analysis of changes over time

    Stefan Priebe;Rosemarie McCabe;Ulrich Junghan;Thomas Kallert

Frequent Co-Authors

Stefan Priebe
Stefan Priebe Queen Mary University of London
Sonia Johnson
Sonia Johnson University College London
Ulrich Reininghaus
Ulrich Reininghaus Heidelberg University
Wulf Rössler
Wulf Rössler University of Zurich
Mike Slade
Mike Slade University of Nottingham
Tom Burns
Tom Burns University of Oxford
David Kingdon
David Kingdon University of Southampton
Paul McCrone
Paul McCrone King's College London
Fiona Gillison
Fiona Gillison University of Bath
Charles Abraham
Charles Abraham University of Exeter

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens up a range of career opportunities, especially in fields that require specialized licensure. One increasingly popular area is applied behavior analysis, with a focus on becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA). Many students pursue related online degrees in psychology, education, or applied behavior analysis as a stepping stone to meet specific certification requirements.

The path toward earning your BCBA involves meeting varied requirements depending on your location. For example, those interested in practicing in Boston should review the bcba certification requirements in Boston to ensure they fulfill local standards. Similarly, for aspiring professionals in New York, understanding the steps for becoming a bcba in Buffalo can help you plan your educational journey.

If you’re considering building your career in a different part of the country, it's worth checking the process for becoming a bcba in Chandler or learning more about Charlotte bcba requirements. Each region may have unique criteria or opportunities for online study and local internships, making it important to choose the right pathway based on your goals and location.

Best Scientists Citing Rosemarie McCabe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles