World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 55 4451 4121 480 455 254 9379

Katherine Berry publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Katherine Berry between 2003 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Katherine Berry published across 24 years, from 2003 to 2026, averaging 13.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 50 publications in 2021. 27 of the 328 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 50. Peak 50 publications in 2021. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 19 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 26 publications 2019: 26 publications 2020: 25 publications 2021: 50 publications 2022: 24 publications 2023: 26 publications 2024: 23 publications 2025: 26 publications 2026: 1 publication
2003 2026

328 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Katherine Berry: publications per year, 2003 to 2026
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 0
2005 0
2006 2
2007 6
2008 4
2009 5
2010 6
2011 5
2012 5
2013 7
2014 9
2015 17
2016 19
2017 15
2018 26
2019 26
2020 25
2021 50
2022 24
2023 26
2024 23
2025 26
2026 1
Total 328
Download as CSV

Katherine Berry publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Katherine Berry sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 251–260 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 254 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201 254
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Katherine Berry D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Katherine Berry sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408 55
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Katherine Berry is affiliated with the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and medicine with a strong focus on clinical applications and mental health. Within these broad areas, their work includes subfields such as clinical psychology, psychiatry and mental health, social psychology, general health professions, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

Their published work explores a range of topics related to mental health and psychiatric conditions. Core themes in their research include schizophrenia research and treatment, psychiatric care and mental health services, mental health treatment and access, attachment and relationship dynamics, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, mental health and patient involvement, and mental health and psychiatry.

Katherine Berry has contributed to several papers that have appeared in reputable academic journals. Notable recent publications include:

  • "The Relationship Between Dissociation and Symptoms of Psychosis: A Meta-analysis" (2020), published in Schizophrenia Bulletin
  • "The Digital Therapeutic Alliance and Human-Computer Interaction" (2020), published in JMIR Mental Health
  • "The relationship between stigma and subjective quality of life in psychosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis" (2021), published in Clinical Psychology Review
  • "Digital Therapeutic Alliance With Fully Automated Mental Health Smartphone Apps: A Narrative Review" (2022), published in Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • "Enhancing Older Adults' Well-Being and Quality of Life Through Purposeful Activity: A Systematic Review of Intervention Studies" (2021), published in The Gerontologist

The frequent co-authors listed in their research collaborations include Sandra Bucci, Gillian Haddock, Dawn Edge, Jessica Raphael, and Owen Price.

Berry's work has been published often in a select group of academic journals, reflecting specialized interests in clinical and psychiatric psychology arenas. These frequent publication venues are:

  • British Journal of Clinical Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
  • BMC Psychiatry
  • BJPsych Open
  • Psychosis

Their academic records demonstrate a sustained contribution to clinical psychology with over 100 publications in this subfield, alongside significant work in psychiatry and social psychology. This body of work contributes to better understanding various facets of mental health treatment, patient experiences, and intervention strategies.

Best Publications

  • A review of the role of adult attachment style in psychosis: unexplored issues and questions for further research.

    Katherine Berry;Christine Barrowclough;Alison Wearden

  • Attachment theory: A framework for understanding symptoms and interpersonal relationships in psychosis

    Katherine Berry;Christine Barrowclough;Alison Wearden

  • Attachment styles, interpersonal relationships and psychotic phenomena in a non-clinical student sample

    Katherine Berry;Alison Wearden;Christine Barrowclough;Tom Liversidge

  • Relationship between childhood adversity and bipolar affective disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Jasper Palmier-Claus;Katherine Berry;Sandra Bucci;Warren Mansell

  • Actissist: Proof-of-Concept Trial of a Theory-Driven Digital Intervention for Psychosis.

    Sandra Bucci;Christine Barrowclough;John Ainsworth;Matthew Machin

  • Effective nurse–patient relationships in mental health care: A systematic review of interventions to improve the therapeutic alliance

    Samantha Hartley;Jessica Raphael;Karina Lovell;Katherine Berry

  • The implementation of the NICE guidelines for schizophrenia: barriers to the implementation of psychological interventions and recommendations for the future.

    Katherine. Berry;Gillian. Haddock

  • Changes in attachment representations during psychological therapy

    Peter Taylor;Julia Rietzschel;Adam Danquah;Katherine Berry

  • Reviewing evidence for the cognitive model of auditory hallucinations: The relationship between cognitive voice appraisals and distress during psychosis

    Amy Mawson;Keren Cohen;Katherine Berry

  • The relationship between dissociation and voices: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

    Marie Pilton;Filippo Varese;Katherine Berry;Sandra Bucci

  • Social networks and symptomatic and functional outcomes in schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Amy Degnan;Katherine Berry;Daryl Sweet;Kathryn Abel

  • PTSD symptoms associated with the experiences of psychosis and hospitalisation: a review of the literature.

    Katherine Berry;Sarah Ford;Lorna Jellicoe-Jones;Gillian Haddock

  • The role of guilt in the development of post-traumatic stress disorder: A systematic review

    Lauren R. Pugh;Peter J. Taylor;Katherine Berry

  • Adult attachment and psychotic phenomenology in clinical and non‐clinical samples: A systematic review

    Nikie Korver-Nieberg;Katherine Berry;Carin J. Meijer;Lieuwe de Haan

  • The Relationship Between Dissociation and Symptoms of Psychosis: A Meta-analysis.

    Eleanor Longden;Alison Branitsky;Andrew Moskowitz;Katherine Berry

  • Adult attachment, parenting experiences, and core beliefs about self and others

    Alison Wearden;Isabel Peters;Katherine Berry;Christine Barrowclough

  • The Role of Therapist Attachment in Alliance and Outcome: A Systematic Literature Review

    Amy Degnan;Annily Seymour-Hyde;Alison Harris;Katherine Berry

  • Psychological mediators of the association between childhood adversities and psychosis: A systematic review.

    Jessica Williams;Sandra Bucci;Katherine Berry;Filippo Varese

  • Therapeutic alliance in psychological therapy for people with schizophrenia and related psychoses: A systematic review.

    Lucy Shattock;Katherine Berry;Amy Degnan;Dawn Edge

  • “They Are Not Hard-to-Reach Clients. We Have Just Got Hard-to-Reach Services.” Staff Views of Digital Health Tools in Specialist Mental Health Services.

    Sandra Bucci;Natalie Berry;Rohan Morris;Katherine Berry

  • Attachment styles, earlier interpersonal relationships and schizotypy in a non-clinical sample

    Katherine Berry;Rebecca Band;Rhiannon Corcoran;Christine Barrowclough

  • Applying interpersonal theories to the understanding of and therapy for auditory hallucinations: a review of the literature and directions for further research.

    Mark Hayward;Katherine Berry;Amy Ashton

Frequent Co-Authors

Sandra Bucci
Sandra Bucci University of Manchester
Gillian Haddock
Gillian Haddock Manchester Academic Health Science Centre
Christine Barrowclough
Christine Barrowclough University of Manchester
Alison Wearden
Alison Wearden University of Manchester
Richard Emsley
Richard Emsley King's College London
Richard Drake
Richard Drake University of Manchester
Filippo Varese
Filippo Varese University of Manchester
Mark Hayward
Mark Hayward University of Sussex
Shôn Lewis
Shôn Lewis University of Manchester
Daniel Pratt
Daniel Pratt University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens doors to a variety of rewarding online career pathways. Recently, online programs have made it easier than ever to pursue specialized roles within behavioral health, such as becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA).

Those interested in behavioral analysis can find region-specific guidance for starting their journey, such as becoming a bcba in Seattle, which outlines state requirements and recommended educational tracks. Likewise, understanding Spokane bcba education requirements is crucial for prospective students in that region.

Opportunities extend far beyond Washington State. If you’re considering this career in the Midwest, this resource on how to become a bcba in St. Louis covers essential steps including graduate study, practicum experiences, and licensure. Similarly, you can investigate becoming a bcba in St. Petersburg for insight into Florida’s process and opportunities.

No matter where you start, researching local licensure requirements and accredited online degree options will help you build a solid foundation for a fulfilling career in psychology and behavior analysis.

Best Scientists Citing Katherine Berry

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles