World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 47 6066 5643 616 584 197 12764

Richard Drake publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Richard Drake between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Richard Drake published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 6.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2015. 16 of the 241 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2015. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 7 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 4 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 30 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 8 publications
1990 2025

241 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Richard Drake: publications per year, 1990 to 2025
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 4
1999 1
2000 7
2001 1
2002 4
2003 6
2004 8
2005 4
2006 3
2007 4
2008 5
2009 2
2010 11
2011 10
2012 6
2013 8
2014 13
2015 30
2016 10
2017 10
2018 15
2019 19
2020 12
2021 12
2022 8
2023 11
2024 8
2025 8
Total 241
Download as CSV

Richard Drake publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Drake sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 191–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 197 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343 197
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Richard Drake D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Drake sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 47
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Richard Drake is affiliated with the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom. Their research work primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Psychology, with significant contributions in Psychiatry and Mental Health, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

The scientist's research focuses on several main topics, including:

  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Sleep and related disorders
  • Mental Health Research Topics

Frequent publication venues where Richard Drake has contributed include:

  • Schizophrenia Bulletin
  • BMC Psychiatry
  • BJPsych Open
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin Open

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Richard Drake include:

  • Effect of delaying treatment of first-episode psychosis on symptoms and social outcomes: a longitudinal analysis and modelling study, 2020, The Lancet Psychiatry

Other relevant recent studies in related research fields include:

  • A core outcome set for future endometriosis research: an international consensus development study, 2020, BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
  • Dopamine and Glutamate in Antipsychotic-Responsive Compared With Antipsychotic-Nonresponsive Psychosis: A Multicenter Positron Emission Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Study (STRATA), 2020, Schizophrenia Bulletin
  • Smartphone-Enhanced Symptom Management In Psychosis: Open, Randomized Controlled Trial, 2020, Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Co-design of a Smartphone App for People Living With Dementia by Applying Agile, Iterative Co-design Principles: Development and Usability Study, 2021, JMIR mhealth and uhealth

Richard Drake collaborates frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Shôn Lewis
  • Gillian Haddock
  • James Walters
  • Alice Egerton
  • James H. MacCabe

Best Publications

  • Association Between Duration of Untreated Psychosis and Outcome in Cohorts of First-Episode Patients: A Systematic Review

    Max Marshall;Shon Lewis;Austin Lockwood;Richard Drake

  • Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia: Treatment Response and Resistance in Psychosis (TRRIP) Working Group Consensus Guidelines on Diagnosis and Terminology.

    Oliver D. Howes;Rob McCutcheon;Ofer Agid;Andrea De Bartolomeis

  • The QCAE: A Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy

    Renate L. E. P. Reniers;Rhiannon Corcoran;Richard Drake;Nick M. Shryane

  • Sex differences in schizophrenia

    Kathryn M. Abel;Richard Drake;Jill M. Goldstein

  • Randomised controlled trial of cognitive-behavioural therapy in early schizophrenia: acute-phase outcomes.

    Shôn Lewis;Nicholas Tarrier;Gillian Haddock;Richard Bentall

  • Causes and consequences of duration of untreated psychosis in schizophrenia.

    Richard J. Drake;Clifford J. Haley;Shahid Akhtar;Shôn W. Lewis

  • Cognitive-behavioural therapy in first-episode and early schizophrenia: 18-month follow-up of a randomised controlled trial

    Nicholas Tarrier;Shôn Lewis;Gillian Haddock;Richard Bentall

  • The evolution of insight, paranoia and depression during early schizophrenia

    Richard Drake;Andrew Pickles;Richard Bentall;P. Kinderman

  • The Psychotic Symptom Rating Scales (PSYRATS): their usefulness and properties in first episode psychosis.

    Richard Drake;Gillian Haddock;Nicholas Tarrier;Richard Bentall

  • A pilot study evaluating the effectiveness of individual inpatient cognitive-behavioural therapy in early psychosis.

    G. Haddock;N. Tarrier;A. P. Morrison;R. Hopkins

  • A systematic review and meta-analysis of cognitive remediation in early schizophrenia

    Emily R Revell;Joanna Neill;Michael Harte;Zarshed Khan

  • Insight and neurocognition in schizophrenia

    Richard James Drake;Shôn William Lewis

  • Amisulpride and olanzapine followed by open-label treatment with clozapine in first-episode schizophrenia and schizophreniform disorder (OPTiMiSE): a three-phase switching study.

    René S Kahn;Inge Winter van Rossum;Stefan Leucht;Philip McGuire;Philip McGuire

  • The benefit of minocycline on negative symptoms of schizophrenia in patients with recent-onset psychosis (BeneMin): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

    Bill Deakin;John Suckling;John Suckling;Thomas R E Barnes;Kelly Byrne;Kelly Byrne

  • Insight as a predictor of the outcome of first-episode nonaffective psychosis in a prospective cohort study in England.

    Richard J. Drake;Graham Dunn;Nick Tarrier;Richard P. Bentall

  • Social cognition in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Jack Cotter;Joseph Firth;Christian Enzinger;Evangelos Kontopantelis

  • What drives poor functioning in the at-risk mental state? A systematic review

    Jack Cotter;Richard J. Drake;Sandra Bucci;Joseph Firth

  • Effect of delaying treatment of first-episode psychosis on symptoms and social outcomes: a longitudinal analysis and modelling study.

    Richard J. Drake;Richard J. Drake;Nusrat Husain;Nusrat Husain;Max Marshall;Shôn W Lewis;Shôn W Lewis

  • In vivo imaging of brain microglial activity in antipsychotic-free and medicated schizophrenia: a [(11)C](R)-PK11195 positron emission tomography study.

    S E Holmes;R Hinz;R J Drake;C J Gregory

  • Suicide behaviour over 18 months in recent onset schizophrenic patients: the effects of CBT.

    Nicholas Tarrier;Gillian Haddock;Shon Lewis;Richard Drake

  • Influence of age on outcome of psychological treatments in first-episode psychosis

    Gillian Haddock;Shôn Lewis;Richard Bentall;Graham Dunn

Frequent Co-Authors

Shôn Lewis
Shôn Lewis University of Manchester
Graham Dunn
Graham Dunn University of Manchester
Fiona Lobban
Fiona Lobban Lancaster University
Alison R. Yung
Alison R. Yung Deakin University
Richard Emsley
Richard Emsley King's College London
Christine Barrowclough
Christine Barrowclough University of Manchester
Alison Wearden
Alison Wearden University of Manchester
Gillian Haddock
Gillian Haddock Manchester Academic Health Science Centre
Sandra Bucci
Sandra Bucci University of Manchester
Rhiannon Corcoran
Rhiannon Corcoran University of Liverpool

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens a wide array of academic and professional opportunities. Many students wonder, are online psychology degrees accepted by employers? The good news is that reputable, accredited online programs are widely recognized and can lead to careers in counseling, research, and more.

One specialized field gaining popularity is forensic psychology. If you're curious about what is forensic psychology, it blends psychology and criminal justice, preparing professionals to work within legal and law enforcement settings.

Choosing between a Bachelor of Arts or a Bachelor of Science can be confusing. The difference between psychology ba and bs programs generally lies in their focus—BAs offer a broader liberal arts education, while BS degrees emphasize science and research methods.

For those seeking advanced roles, accelerated programs are an option. The fastest online psyd programs can help you earn a doctoral degree swiftly, paving the way for clinical practice and leadership roles in mental health care.

Best Scientists Citing Richard Drake

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles