World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
33
Citations
5279
World Ranking
921
National Ranking
150

Tim Gray publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tim Gray sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 168 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Tim Gray D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tim Gray sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tim Gray is affiliated with Newcastle University in the United Kingdom and specializes in Environmental Science. Their research spans several subfields, including Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Ecology, Sociology and Political Science, and Political Science and International Relations.

The main topics of Tim Gray's work focus on marine and fisheries research, coastal and marine management, coral and marine ecosystems studies, marine bivalve and aquaculture studies, natural resources and economic development, international maritime law issues, and agricultural risk and resilience.

Frequent publication venues for their research include Marine Policy, Sustainability, Fishes, OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University), and the International Conference on Evolvable Systems.

Tim Gray has collaborated regularly with several coauthors, among whom are Nwamaka Okeke-Ogbuafor, Selina M. Stead, O. A. L. Paramor, Jenny Hatchard, and Knut H. Mikalsen.

Recent publications by Tim Gray include:

  • Principles and practical criteria for effective participatory environmental planning and decision-making, 2022, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management
  • Oceanographic characteristics at fish aggregating device sites for tuna pole-and-line fishery in eastern Indonesia, 2020, Fisheries Research
  • Marine Pollution in Kuwait and Its Impacts on Fish-Stock Decline in Kuwaiti Waters: Reviewing the Kuwaiti Government's Policies and Practices, 2021, Frontiers in Sustainability
  • Is community-based management of small-scale fisheries in Sierra Leone the answer to their problems?, 2021, World Development Perspectives
  • Alleviating impacts of climate change on fishing communities using weather information to improve fishers' resilience, 2022, Frontiers in Environmental Science

Best Publications

  • The ‘Social Gap’ in Wind Farm Siting Decisions: Explanations and Policy Responses

    Derek Bell;Tim Gray;Claire Haggett

  • Re-visiting the ‘social gap’: public opinion and relations of power in the local politics of wind energy

    Derek Bell;Tim Gray;Claire Haggett;Joanne Swaffield

  • Fisheries science and sustainability in international policy: a study of failure in the European Union's Common Fisheries Policy

    Timothy Daw;Tim Gray

  • Discards in North Sea fisheries: causes, consequences and solutions

    T.L. Catchpole;C.L.J. Frid;T.S. Gray

  • Participation in fisheries governance

    Tim S. Gray

  • The concept of fisheries-dependent communities a comparative analysis of four UK case studies: Shetland, Peterhead, North Shields and Lowestoft

    Katherine Brookfield;Tim Gray;Jenny Hatchard

  • Water Politics in the Middle East: A Context for Conflict or Cooperation?

    Mostafa Dolatyar;Tim Gray

  • The 2002 reform of the Common Fisheries Policy's system of governance—rhetoric or reality?

    Tim Gray;Jenny Hatchard

  • Offshore wind farms and commercial fisheries in the UK: A study in Stakeholder Consultation

    Tim Gray;Claire Haggett;Derek Bell

  • From community-based to centralised national management—A wrong turning for the governance of the marine protected area in Apo Island, Philippines?

    E.J. Hind;M.C. Hiponia;T.S. Gray

  • Commodification of Volunteer Tourism: a Comparative Study of Volunteer Tourists in Vietnam and in Thailand

    Nathalie Coren;Nathalie Coren;Tim Gray

  • Introduction: Interaction between environment and fisheries-The role of stakeholder participation

    Riku Varjopuro;Tim Gray;Jenny Hatchard;Felix Rauschmayer

  • Reducing discards of fish at sea: a review of European pilot projects.

    Tom L. Catchpole;Tim S. Gray

  • Discarding in the English north-east coast Nephrops norvegicus fishery: the role of social and environmental factors

    T.L. Catchpole;C.L.J. Frid;T.S. Gray

  • Co-management and adaptive co-management: Two modes of governance in a Honduran marine protected area

    Natalie K. Bown;Tim S. Gray;Selina M. Stead

  • A complicated relationship: Stakeholder participation and the ecosystem-based approach to fisheries management

    Tim Gray;Jenny Hatchard

  • Theorising about Participatory Fisheries Governance

    Tim S Gray

  • MPA policy: What lies behind the science?

    Alex J. Caveen;Tim S. Gray;Selina M. Stead;Nicholas V.C. Polunin

  • The challenges of the landing obligation in EU fisheries

    Thomas L. Catchpole;Ana Ribeiro-Santos;Stephen C. Mangi;Christopher Hedley

  • The new mode of marine planning in the UK: Aspirations and challenges

    Gavin Scarff;Clare Fitzsimmons;Tim Gray

  • EU marine strategy framework directive (MSFD) and marine spatial planning (MSP): Which is the more dominant and practicable contributor to maritime policy in the UK?

    Jonathon Brennan;Clare Fitzsimmons;Tim Gray;Laura Raggatt

  • Sandeels, sailors, sandals and suits: The strategy of the environmental movement in relation to the fishing industry

    Tim S. Gray;Mark J. Gray;Rod A. Hague

  • The so-called ‘moratorium’ on the licensing of new genetically modified (GM) products by the European Union 1998–2004: a study in ambiguity

    Sarah Lieberman;Tim Gray

  • The Ambiguous Role of the Environment Agency in England and Wales

    D. Bell;T. Gray

Frequent Co-Authors

Nicholas Polunin
Nicholas Polunin Newcastle University
Chris Frid
Chris Frid Griffith University
Tim M. Daw
Tim M. Daw Stockholm University
J. Grant Burgess
J. Grant Burgess Newcastle University
Narriman Jiddawi
Narriman Jiddawi University of Dar es Salaam
Tim R. McClanahan
Tim R. McClanahan Wildlife Conservation Society
Nicholas A. J. Graham
Nicholas A. J. Graham Lancaster University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Political Science in the USA opens doors to a range of interdisciplinary and specialized career paths. Many students complement their knowledge with related fields, which can boost employability and adapt to today’s diverse job market.

For example, students interested in policy analysis or data-driven research might explore a mathematics degree online to build their quantitative skills. Those considering roles in information management, government agencies, or advocacy groups could benefit from enrolling in one of the best library science programs for a specialization in digital resources and research tools.

If your interests span history and context, learning how to get a history degree can support careers in research, teaching, or public policy. Meanwhile, an interdisciplinary studies course provides maximum flexibility, letting you tailor your coursework to match shifting career goals in politics, communications, or global relations.

With numerous online degrees available, students can pursue pathways that align closely with their ambitions in political science and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Tim Gray

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles