World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 61 1336 1186 97 89 514 17443

Raimondo Bruno publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Raimondo Bruno between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Raimondo Bruno published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 20 papers a year. Output peaked at 55 publications in 2015. 27 of the 559 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 55. Peak 55 publications in 2015. 1998: 3 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 4 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 7 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 17 publications 2009: 24 publications 2010: 22 publications 2011: 33 publications 2012: 31 publications 2013: 29 publications 2014: 26 publications 2015: 55 publications 2016: 46 publications 2017: 40 publications 2018: 37 publications 2019: 38 publications 2020: 28 publications 2021: 30 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 12 publications
1998 2025

559 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Raimondo Bruno: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 3
1999 1
2000 4
2001 8
2002 1
2003 7
2004 5
2005 3
2006 11
2007 13
2008 17
2009 24
2010 22
2011 33
2012 31
2013 29
2014 26
2015 55
2016 46
2017 40
2018 37
2019 38
2020 28
2021 30
2022 12
2023 8
2024 15
2025 12
Total 559
Download as CSV

Raimondo Bruno publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raimondo Bruno sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 514–523 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 514 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12 514
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Raimondo Bruno D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raimondo Bruno sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86 61
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Raimondo Bruno is affiliated with the University of Tasmania in Australia. Their academic work is primarily situated within the field of Medicine, with a total of 141 publications. More specifically, their research spans several subfields including Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Pharmacology, and Toxicology.

Their recent research output includes studies on adolescent alcohol use, mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic, and neurochemical mechanisms associated with PTSD. Notable papers include:

  • Adolescent Alcohol Use Trajectories: Risk Factors and Adult Outcomes, 2020, published in PEDIATRICS
  • Changes in mental health and help-seeking among young Australian adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: a prospective cohort study, 2021, published in Psychological Medicine
  • Dopamine, endocannabinoids and their interaction in fear extinction and negative affect in PTSD, 2020, published in Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
  • Simultaneous quantification of endocannabinoids, oleoylethanolamide and steroid hormones in human plasma and saliva, 2020, published in Journal of Chromatography B
  • Changes in illicit drug use and markets with the COVID-19 pandemic and associated restrictions: findings from the Ecstasy and Related Drugs Reporting System, 2016-20, 2021, published in Addiction

The main topics explored in their work include:

  • Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
  • Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects

Raimondo Bruno collaborates extensively within their field. Frequent co-authors include Amy Peacock, Louisa Degenhardt, Nicholas Lintzeris, Philip Clare, and Paul Dietze.

Their research has been published in several key venues, including:

  • Addiction
  • Drug and Alcohol Review
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • International Journal of Drug Policy
  • UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia)

Best Publications

  • Circulating microRNAs in sera correlate with soluble biomarkers of immune activation but do not predict mortality in ART treated individuals with HIV-1 infection : a case control study

    Daniel D. Murray;Kazuo Suzuki;Matthew Law;Jonel Trebicka

  • Adherence to the Caffeine Intake Guideline during Pregnancy and Birth Outcomes: A Prospective Cohort Study.

    Amy Peacock;Delyse Hutchinson;Judy Wilson;Clare McCormack

  • New psychoactive substances: challenges for drug surveillance, control, and public health responses

    Amy Peacock;Amy Peacock;Raimondo Bruno;Raimondo Bruno;Natasa Gisev;Louisa Degenhardt

  • Cocaine, MDMA and methamphetamine residues in wastewater: Consumption trends (2009–2015) in South East Queensland, Australia

    Foon Yin Lai;Jake W. O'Brien;Phong K. Thai;Wayne Hall

  • Australian Drug Trends 2000: Findings of the Illicit Drug Reporting System (IDRS)

    Libby Topp;Shane Darke;Raimondo B Bruno;Craig Lindsay Fry

  • Refining the excretion factors of methadone and codeine for wastewater analysis - combining data from pharmacokinetic and wastewater studies

    Phong K. Thai;Phong K. Thai;Foon Yin Lai;Raimondo Bruno;Emma van Dyken

  • Effect of cannabis use in people with chronic non-cancer pain prescribed opioids: findings from a 4-year prospective cohort study

    Gabrielle Campbell;Wayne Hall;Wayne Hall;Amy Peacock;Nicholas Lintzeris

  • Refining the estimation of illicit drug consumptions from wastewater analysis: Co-analysis of prescription pharmaceuticals and uncertainty assessment

    Foon Yin Lai;Christoph Ort;Christoph Ort;Coral Gartner;Steve Carter

  • Prescription of opioid analgesics and related harms in Australia.

    Amanda Roxburgh;Raimondo Bruno;Briony Larance;Lucy Burns

  • Comparison of unlimited numbers of rapid transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and ECT treatment sessions in major depressive episode.

    Saxby Pridmore;Saxby Pridmore;Raimondo Bruno;Yvonne Turnier-Shea;Phil Reid

  • The epidemiology of methamphetamine use and harm in Australia

    Louisa Degenhardt;Amanda Roxburgh;Emma Black;Raimondo Bruno

  • Is ecstasy a drug of dependence

    Louisa Degenhardt;Raimondo Bruno;Libby Topp

  • Experience of adjunctive cannabis use for chronic non-cancer pain: findings from the Pain and Opioids IN Treatment (POINT) study.

    Louisa Degenhardt;Louisa Degenhardt;Nicholas Lintzeris;Gabrielle Campbell;Raimondo Bruno;Raimondo Bruno

  • Benzodiazepine Use among Chronic Pain Patients Prescribed Opioids: Associations with Pain, Physical and Mental Health, and Health Service Utilization

    Suzanne Nielsen;Nicholas Lintzeris;Raimondo Bruno;Raimondo Bruno;Gabrielle Campbell

  • Shame and guilt-proneness: Divergent implications for problematic alcohol use and drinking to cope with anxiety and depression symptomatology

    Matt Treeby;Raimondo Bruno

  • The Pain and Opioids in Treatment study: Characteristics of a cohort using opioids to manage chronic non-cancer pain

    Gabrielle Campbell;Suzanne Nielsen;Raimondo Bruno;Raimondo Bruno;Nicholas Lintzeris

  • The prevalence and correlates of chronic pain and suicidality in a nationally representative sample

    Gabrielle Campbell;Shane Darke;Raimondo Bruno;Louisa Degenhardt

  • The Australian drug harms ranking study

    Yvonne Bonomo;Amanda Norman;Sam Biondo;Raimondo Bruno

  • Using quantitative wastewater analysis to measure daily usage of conventional and emerging illicit drugs at an annual music festival

    Foon Yin Lai;Phong K. Thai;Jake O'Brien;Coral Gartner

  • The Subjective Physiological, Psychological, and Behavioral Risk-Taking Consequences of Alcohol and Energy Drink Co-Ingestion

    Amy Peacock;Raimondo Bruno;Frances H. Martin

  • Australian Drug Trends 2007: Findings from the Illicit Drug Reporting System (IDRS)

    Emma Black;Amanda Roxburgh;Louisa Degenhardt;Raimondo Bruno

Frequent Co-Authors

Louisa Degenhardt
Louisa Degenhardt University of New South Wales
Wayne Hall
Wayne Hall University of Queensland
Nicholas Lintzeris
Nicholas Lintzeris University of Sydney
Phong K. Thai
Phong K. Thai University of Queensland
Jochen F. Mueller
Jochen F. Mueller University of Queensland
Michael Farrell
Michael Farrell University of New South Wales
Christoph Ort
Christoph Ort Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology
Delyse Hutchinson
Delyse Hutchinson Deakin University
Dan I. Lubman
Dan I. Lubman Monash University
Rosa Alati
Rosa Alati Curtin University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens up a diverse range of online academic and career opportunities. Many students now opt for 1 year master's programs to upgrade their qualifications quickly and efficiently—ideal for those eager to start their professional journey or move up in their fields.

For those seeking a swifter route to a bachelor’s, accelerated online degree programs provide a flexible way to earn a degree faster without sacrificing quality. These programs are perfect for working professionals and non-traditional learners who need to balance study with other commitments.

Social work is another popular path, and affordability can make a big difference. Several institutions offer the cheapest online MSW programs, allowing students to gain specialized skills without incurring high debt.

Finally, for those interested in behavioral analysis, there are accredited BCBA online masters programs. These programs cater to aspiring Board Certified Behavior Analysts who want high-quality, affordable training online.

Best Scientists Citing Raimondo Bruno

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles