World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Environmental Sciences
Germany
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
77
Citations
31961
World Ranking
1110
National Ranking
72

Ina Tegen publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ina Tegen sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 246 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Ina Tegen D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ina Tegen sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Germany Leader Award

Overview

Ina Tegen is affiliated with the Leibniz Association in Germany and contributes extensively to the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences. Their research primarily focuses on atmospheric phenomena and planetary-scale processes, with particular emphasis on aerosol dynamics, gas transport, and climate interactions.

The scientist's work explores a variety of subfields, including:

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Earth-Surface Processes
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Main topics addressed in their research encompass:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Aeolian processes and effects
  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Cryospheric studies and observations

Ina Tegen has published in several notable scientific venues, contributing frequently to:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Geoscientific model development
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres

Their recent publications include:

  • "Characterization of organic aerosol across the global remote troposphere: a comparison of ATom measurements and global chemistry models," 2020, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • "Global cycling and climate effects of aeolian dust controlled by biological soil crusts," 2022, Nature Geoscience
  • "Biodiversity loss and climate extremes - study the feedbacks," 2022, Nature
  • "Atmospheric Dynamics and Numerical Simulations of Six Frontal Dust Storms in the Middle East Region," 2021, Atmosphere
  • "Glimpsing the Ins and Outs of the Arctic Atmospheric Cauldron," 2021, Eos

Frequent collaborators of Ina Tegen include:

  • Bernd Heinold
  • Holger Baars
  • Anne Kubin
  • Fabian Senf
  • Hartmut Herrmann

Best Publications

  • Global Iron Connections Between Desert Dust, Ocean Biogeochemistry, and Climate

    T. Jickells;Z An;K.K. Andersen;A.R. Baker

  • Sources and distributions of dust aerosols simulated with the GOCART model

    Paul Ginoux;Mian Chin;Ina Tegen;Joseph M. Prospero

  • The influence on climate forcing of mineral aerosols from disturbed soils

    Ina Tegen;Ina Tegen;Andrew A. Lacis;Inez Fung;Inez Fung

  • Atmospheric global dust cycle and iron inputs to the ocean

    Natalie M. Mahowald;Alex R. Baker;Gilles Bergametti;Nick Brooks

  • Modeling of mineral dust in the atmosphere: Sources, transport, and optical thickness

    Ina Tegen;Inez Fung

  • The aerosol-climate model ECHAM5-HAM

    P. Stier;J. Feichter;S. Kinne;S. Kloster

  • North African dust emissions and transport

    Sebastian Engelstaedter;Ina Tegen;Richard Washington

  • Contribution to the atmospheric mineral aerosol load from land surface modification

    Ina Tegen;Inez Fung

  • Modeling of particle size distribution and its influence on the radiative properties of mineral dust aerosol

    Ina Tegen;Andrew A. Lacis

  • Contribution of different aerosol species to the global aerosol extinction optical thickness: Estimates from model results

    Ina Tegen;Peter Hollrig;Mian Chin;Mian Chin;Inez Fung;Inez Fung

  • Impact of vegetation and preferential source areas on global dust aerosol: Results from a model study

    Ina Tegen;Sandy P. Harrison;Karen Kohfeld;I. Colin Prentice

  • Relative importance of climate and land use in determining present and future global soil dust emission

    I. Tegen;Martin Werner;S. P. Harrison;K. E. Kohfeld

  • Climate Response to Soil Dust Aerosols

    R. L. Miller;I. Tegen

  • Iron supply and demand in the upper ocean

    Inez Y. Fung;Stephanie K. Meyn;Ina Tegen;Scott C. Doney

  • Climate forcings in the Industrial era

    James E. Hansen;Makiko Sato;Andrew Lacis;Reto Ruedy

  • Surface radiative forcing by soil dust aerosols and the hydrologic cycle

    R. L. Miller;R. L. Miller;I. Tegen;Jan Perlwitz;Jan Perlwitz

  • Quantifying mineral dust mass budgets:Terminology, constraints, and current estimates

    C. S. Zender;R. L.R. L. Miller;I. Tegen

  • Climate forcings in Goddard Institute for Space Studies SI2000 simulations

    J. Hansen;M. Sato;M. Sato;L. Nazarenko;L. Nazarenko;R. Ruedy

  • A new Saharan dust source activation frequency map derived from MSG-SEVIRI IR-channels

    Kerstin Schepanski;Kerstin Schepanski;I. Tegen;B. Laurent;B. Heinold

  • Tropospheric sulfur simulation and sulfate direct radiative forcing in the Goddard Institute for Space Studies general circulation model

    Dorothy Koch;Daniel James Jacob;Ina Tegen;David Michael Rind

  • The Saharan Aerosol Long-Range Transport and Aerosol–Cloud-Interaction Experiment: Overview and Selected Highlights

    B. Weinzierl;A. Ansmann;J. Prospero;D. Althausen

Frequent Co-Authors

Bernd Heinold
Bernd Heinold Leibniz Association
Kerstin Schepanski
Kerstin Schepanski Leibniz Association
Ron L. Miller
Ron L. Miller Goddard Institute for Space Studies
Peter Knippertz
Peter Knippertz Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Bernadett Weinzierl
Bernadett Weinzierl University of Vienna
Albert Ansmann
Albert Ansmann Leibniz Association
Karen E. Kohfeld
Karen E. Kohfeld Simon Fraser University
Sandy P. Harrison
Sandy P. Harrison University of Reading
Ulrike Lohmann
Ulrike Lohmann ETH Zurich
Manfred Wendisch
Manfred Wendisch Leipzig University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their studies, pursuing eds to edd programs can be a strategic option. These programs offer educators and environmental professionals a way to deepen their expertise while maintaining flexibility through online learning.

Another promising pathway is exploring online dsw programs, which are designed for individuals looking to impact community health and social policies related to environmental justice. These programs blend theory and practice to equip graduates with leadership skills.

Students seeking cost-effective options might consider a budget friendly online general studies degree. This approach allows for a customizable curriculum that can incorporate various interdisciplinary subjects, fostering a broad understanding of environmental issues.

For newcomers or those balancing busy schedules, choosing from the easiest bachelors degree programs available online can help ease the transition into higher education while still focusing on relevant environmental sciences content.

Best Scientists Citing Ina Tegen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles