World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Kostas Kontogiannis

Kostas Kontogiannis

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
37
Citations
4669
World Ranking
10911
National Ranking
433

Kostas Kontogiannis publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kostas Kontogiannis sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 196 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Kostas Kontogiannis D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kostas Kontogiannis sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kostas Kontogiannis is affiliated with York University in Canada and is an active contributor to research primarily in the areas of blockchain technology applications, auction theory, and digital platforms economics. The scholar's work spans several interconnected domains within information systems and management science.

Their recent publications include the following articles:

  • "Goal and Policy Based Code Generation and Deployment of Smart Contracts" (2022), published in the 2022 IEEE International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER)
  • "Erratum to "Improving design quality using meta-pattern transformations: a metric-based approach"" (2023), published in the Journal of Software Evolution and Process
  • "Reputation-Based Trust Assessment of Transacting Service Components" (2024), published in SSRN Electronic Journal

Kontogiannis collaborates frequently with co-authors Konstantinos Tsiounis and Ladan Tahvildari, with co-authored works on topics related to smart contracts and design quality improvements.

The scholar's research themes emphasize:

  • Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Auction Theory and Applications
  • Digital Platforms and Economics

Contributions are also situated within the subfields of:

  • Information Systems
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Strategy and Management

Kostas Kontogiannis' work is documented in publication venues such as:

  • 2022 IEEE International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER)
  • Journal of Software Evolution and Process
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Best Publications

  • Pattern matching for clone and concept detection

    K. A. Kontogiannis;R. Demori;E. Merlo;M. Galler

  • The software bookshelf

    P. J. Finnigan;R. C. Holt;I. Kalas;S. Kerr

  • Advanced clone-analysis to support object-oriented system refactoring

    M. Balazinska;E. Merlo;M. Dagenais;B. Lague

  • Measuring clone based reengineering opportunities

    M. Balazinska;E. Merlo;M. Dagenais;B. Lague

  • Evaluation experiments on the detection of programming patterns using software metrics

    K. Kontogiannis

  • A metric-based approach to enhance design quality through meta-pattern transformations

    L. Tahvildari;K. Kontogiannis

  • Towards portable source code representations using XML

    E. Mamas;K. Kontogiannis

  • Partial redesign of Java software systems based on clone analysis

    M. Balazinska;E. Merlo;M. Dagenais;B. Lague

  • A maintainability model for industrial software systems using design level metrics

    S. Muthanna;K. Kontogiannis;K. Ponnambalam;B. Stacey

  • The Landscape of Service-Oriented Systems: A Research Perspective

    Kostas Kontogiannis;Grace A. Lewis;Dennis B. Smith;Marin Litoiu

  • Reengineering user interfaces

    E. Merlo;P.-Y. Gagne;J.-F. Girard;K. Kontogiannis

  • Improving design quality using meta-pattern transformations: a metric-based approach

    Ladan Tahvildari;Kostas Kontogiannis

  • Investigating reverse engineering technologies for the CAS program understanding project

    E. Buss;R. De Mori;W. M. Gentleman;J. Henshaw

  • Quality-driven software re-engineering

    Ladan Tahvildari;Kostas Kontogiannis;John Mylopoulos

  • Tracing evolution changes of software artifacts through model synchronization

    I. Ivkovic;K. Kontogiannis

  • Code migration through transformations: an experience report

    K. Kontogiannis;J. Martin;K. Wong;R. Gregory

  • Model-driven business process recovery

    Ying Zou;T.C. Lau;K. Kontogiannis;Tack Tong

  • Architectural design recovery using data mining techniques

    K. Sartipi;K. Kontogiannis;F. Mavaddat

  • A Research Agenda for Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA): Maintenance and Evolution of Service-Oriented Systems

    Grace A. Lewis;Dennis B. Smith;Kostas Kontogiannis

  • Transforming legacy Web applications to the MVC architecture

    Yu Ping;K. Kontogiannis;T.C. Lau

  • The software bookshelf

    Patrick Finnigan;Richard C. Holt;Ivan Kallas;Scott Kerr

Frequent Co-Authors

John Mylopoulos
John Mylopoulos University of Ottawa
Ladan Tahvildari
Ladan Tahvildari University of Waterloo
Grace A. Lewis
Grace A. Lewis Carnegie Mellon University
Ying Zou
Ying Zou Queen's University
Hausi A. Müller
Hausi A. Müller University of Victoria
Ettore Merlo
Ettore Merlo Polytechnique Montréal
Marin Litoiu
Marin Litoiu York University
Magdalena Balazinska
Magdalena Balazinska University of Washington
Eleni Stroulia
Eleni Stroulia University of Alberta
Lui Sha
Lui Sha University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens up a range of flexible online study options and lucrative career pathways. For those wanting to enter the tech field quickly, easy licenses and certifications to get can provide a fast track into high-demand IT roles. Certifications in areas like cybersecurity, cloud computing, or programming often lead to well-paying positions with minimal time investment.

Many prospective students also consider associate degrees, which can be completed in about two years or less. Pursuing an online associate degree is a practical and affordable way to earn foundational knowledge and make yourself competitive for entry-level technology jobs.

For those looking to advance further, there are also shortest master degree programs available online, some of which can be completed in under 18 months. Choosing the right graduate program is important, especially since some programs stand out in the market. Learn more about which master's degree is most in demand in usa to maximize your career prospects and potential earnings.

Best Scientists Citing Kostas Kontogiannis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles