World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Rainer Koschke

Rainer Koschke

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
44
Citations
10430
World Ranking
7459
National Ranking
366

Rainer Koschke publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rainer Koschke sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 161 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Rainer Koschke D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rainer Koschke sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Rainer Koschke is affiliated with the University of Bremen in Germany and specializes in the field of Computer Science. Their research spans several subfields including Information Systems, Software, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Human-Computer Interaction, and Computer Science Applications.

The main topics of their scholarly work include Software Engineering Research, Data Visualization and Analytics, Software Testing and Debugging Techniques, Open Source Software Innovations, Software Reliability and Analysis Research, Software System Performance and Reliability, and Usability and User Interface Design.

Rainer Koschke has contributed to multiple publications across various venues. Their publication record includes:

  • A systematic mapping study of clone visualization, 2020, Computer Science Review
  • The Effect of Feature Characteristics on the Performance of Feature Location Techniques, 2021, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
  • Modeling, visualizing, and checking software architectures collaboratively in shared virtual worlds, 2021, Media (https://www.suub.uni-bremen.de/)
  • Mining understandable state machine models from embedded code, 2020, Empirical Software Engineering
  • Robust Parsing of Cloned Token Sequences, 2024, Technische Universität Berlin - Universitätsbibliothek

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Koschke include Muhammad Hammad, Hamid Abdul Basit, Stan Jarzabek, Abdul Razzaq, and Anthony Ventresque. These collaborations reflect interdisciplinary work within the broader Computer Science domain.

Their publications have appeared most often in the following venues:

  • Technische Universität Berlin - Universitätsbibliothek
  • Computer Science Review
  • IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
  • Media (https://www.suub.uni-bremen.de/)
  • Empirical Software Engineering

Best Publications

  • Comparison and evaluation of code clone detection techniques and tools: A qualitative approach

    Chanchal K. Roy;James R. Cordy;Rainer Koschke

  • Comparison and Evaluation of Clone Detection Tools

    S. Bellon;R. Koschke;G. Antoniol;J. Krinke

  • Locating features in source code

    T. Eisenbarth;R. Koschke;D. Simon

  • A Systematic Survey of Program Comprehension through Dynamic Analysis

    B. Cornelissen;A. Zaidman;A. van Deursen;L. Moonen

  • Clone Detection Using Abstract Syntax Suffix Trees

    Rainer Koschke;Raimar Falke;Pierre Frenzel

  • Survey of Research on Software Clones

    Rainer Koschke

  • Atomic architectural component recovery for program understanding and evolution

    R. Koschke

  • Software visualization in software maintenance, reverse engineering, and re-engineering: a research survey

    Rainer Koschke

  • Incremental Clone Detection

    Nils Göde;Rainer Koschke

  • How do professional developers comprehend software

    Tobias Roehm;Rebecca Tiarks;Rainer Koschke;Walid Maalej

  • Effort-Aware Defect Prediction Models

    Thilo Mende;Rainer Koschke

  • On the Comprehension of Program Comprehension

    Walid Maalej;Rebecca Tiarks;Tobias Roehm;Rainer Koschke

  • Aiding program comprehension by static and dynamic feature analysis

    T. Eisenbarth;R. Koschke;D. Simon

  • Revisiting the evaluation of defect prediction models

    Thilo Mende;Rainer Koschke

  • Frequency and risks of changes to clones

    Nils Gode;Rainer Koschke

  • The vision of software clone management: Past, present, and future (Keynote paper)

    Chanchal K. Roy;Minhaz F. Zibran;Rainer Koschke

  • Symphony: view-driven software architecture reconstruction

    A. van Deursen;C. Hofmeister;R. Koschke;L. Moonen

  • Hierarchical reflexion models

    R. Koschke;D. Simon

  • A framework for experimental evaluation of clustering techniques

    R. Koschke;T. Eisenbarth

  • Extending the reflexion method for consolidating software variants into product lines

    Rainer Koschke;Pierre Frenzel;Andreas P. Breu;Karsten Angstmann

  • A Systematic Survey of Program Comprehension through Dynamic Analysis

    S.G.M. Cornelissen;A.E. Zaidman;A. Van Deursen;L. Moonen

  • On the Comprehension of Program Comprehension.

    Walid Maalej;Rebecca Tiarks;Tobias Röhm;Rainer Koschke

Frequent Co-Authors

James R. Cordy
James R. Cordy Queen's University
Katsuro Inoue
Katsuro Inoue Ritsumeikan University
Ettore Merlo
Ettore Merlo Polytechnique Montréal
Walid Maalej
Walid Maalej Hasso Plattner Institute
Leon Moonen
Leon Moonen Simula Research Laboratory
Chanchal K. Roy
Chanchal K. Roy University of Saskatchewan
Christopher D. Hundhausen
Christopher D. Hundhausen Oregon State University
Alexandru Telea
Alexandru Telea Utrecht University
Jens Krinke
Jens Krinke University College London
Stefan Wagner
Stefan Wagner University of Stuttgart

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in Computer Science, a variety of related online degrees and career pathways can open up new opportunities. For those seeking quick entry into the workforce, 6 month associate degree online programs provide a fast-track option into foundational fields such as IT support or cybersecurity.

Many students also consider pairing their technical skills with business knowledge. Earning a business degree online equips graduates for tech management roles and entrepreneurial ventures, combining computing expertise with organizational insight.

Affordability is a key concern for most learners. Numerous cheap online universities now offer accredited bachelor’s degrees in computer science and related fields, making education more accessible than ever before.

For those interested in applying their skills in industries such as robotics, manufacturing, or systems design, look into pursuing an engineering degree online. This pathway frequently overlaps with computer science and can broaden your career options significantly.

Best Scientists Citing Rainer Koschke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles