World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Denys Poshyvanyk

Denys Poshyvanyk

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 87 741 716 390 376 225 20833

Denys Poshyvanyk publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Denys Poshyvanyk between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Denys Poshyvanyk published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 13.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2025. 40 of the 281 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2025. 2005: 4 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 21 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 18 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 16 publications 2025: 24 publications
2005 2025

281 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Denys Poshyvanyk: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 4
2006 8
2007 7
2008 2
2009 10
2010 11
2011 16
2012 13
2013 17
2014 14
2015 21
2016 18
2017 16
2018 19
2019 9
2020 12
2021 13
2022 18
2023 13
2024 16
2025 24
Total 281
Download as CSV

Denys Poshyvanyk publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Denys Poshyvanyk sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 222–231 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 225 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437 225
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Denys Poshyvanyk D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Denys Poshyvanyk sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 86–87 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Denys Poshyvanyk is affiliated with William & Mary in the United States. Their research work is situated primarily in the field of Computer Science, with a focus on several subfields and topics related to software engineering and artificial intelligence.

The scientist's recent papers include:

  • Using pre-trained models to boost code review automation, 2022, Proceedings of the 44th International Conference on Software Engineering
  • A Systematic Literature Review on the Use of Deep Learning in Software Engineering Research, 2022, ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
  • Using Transfer Learning for Code-Related Tasks, 2022, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
  • Toward interactive bug reporting for (android app) end-users, 2022, Proceedings of the 30th ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering
  • Why Crypto-detectors Fail: A Systematic Evaluation of Cryptographic Misuse Detection Techniques, 2022, 2022 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP)

These recent publications reflect work across multiple venues, including:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
  • IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
  • Proceedings of the ACM on software engineering.

Denys Poshyvanyk's research interests cover significant topics and fields within software engineering. The main fields of study include:

  • Computer Science

Subfields of study addressed in their work include:

  • Information Systems
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Software
  • Signal Processing
  • Computer Science Applications

Their focus within these areas encompasses topics such as:

  • Software Engineering Research
  • Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
  • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Topic Modeling
  • Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
  • Software Engineering Techniques and Practices

Frequent collaborators of this scientist include:

  • Gabriele Bavota
  • Oscar Chaparro
  • Nathan Cooper
  • Kevin Moran
  • Michele Tufano

Best Publications

  • Feature location in source code: a taxonomy and survey

    Bogdan Dit;Meghan Revelle;Malcom Gethers;Denys Poshyvanyk

  • Feature Location Using Probabilistic Ranking of Methods Based on Execution Scenarios and Information Retrieval

    D. Poshyvanyk;Y.-G. Gueheneuc;A. Marcus;G. Antoniol

  • Deep learning code fragments for code clone detection

    Martin White;Michele Tufano;Christopher Vendome;Denys Poshyvanyk

  • SequenceR : Sequence-to-Sequence Learning for End-to-End Program Repair

    Zimin Chen;Steve Kommrusch;Michele Tufano;Louis-Noel Pouchet

  • Portfolio: finding relevant functions and their usage

    Collin McMillan;Mark Grechanik;Denys Poshyvanyk;Qing Xie

  • Using the Conceptual Cohesion of Classes for Fault Prediction in Object-Oriented Systems

    A. Marcus;D. Poshyvanyk;R. Ferenc

  • Combining Formal Concept Analysis with Information Retrieval for Concept Location in Source Code

    D. Poshyvanyk;A. Marcus

  • API change and fault proneness: a threat to the success of Android apps

    Mario Linares-Vásquez;Gabriele Bavota;Carlos Bernal-Cárdenas;Massimiliano Di Penta

  • How to effectively use topic models for software engineering tasks? an approach based on genetic algorithms

    Annibale Panichella;Bogdan Dit;Rocco Oliveto;Massimilano Di Penta

  • Mining Version Histories for Detecting Code Smells

    Fabio Palomba;Gabriele Bavota;Massimiliano Di Penta;Rocco Oliveto

  • An Empirical Study on Learning Bug-Fixing Patches in the Wild via Neural Machine Translation

    Michele Tufano;Cody Watson;Gabriele Bavota;Massimiliano Di Penta

  • Feature location via information retrieval based filtering of a single scenario execution trace

    Dapeng Liu;Andrian Marcus;Denys Poshyvanyk;Vaclav Rajlich

  • Detecting bad smells in source code using change history information

    Fabio Palomba;Gabriele Bavota;Massimiliano Di Penta;Rocco Oliveto

  • When and why your code starts to smell bad

    Michele Tufano;Fabio Palomba;Gabriele Bavota;Rocco Oliveto

  • Mining energy-greedy API usage patterns in Android apps: an empirical study

    Mario Linares-Vásquez;Gabriele Bavota;Carlos Bernal-Cárdenas;Rocco Oliveto

  • Toward deep learning software repositories

    Martin White;Christopher Vendome;Mario Linares-Vasquez;Denys Poshyvanyk

  • Using information retrieval based coupling measures for impact analysis

    Denys Poshyvanyk;Andrian Marcus;Rudolf Ferenc;Tibor Gyimóthy

  • When and Why Your Code Starts to Smell Bad (and Whether the Smells Go Away)

    Michele Tufano;Fabio Palomba;Gabriele Bavota;Rocco Oliveto

  • Automatically Discovering, Reporting and Reproducing Android Application Crashes

    Kevin Moran;Mario Linares-Vasquez;Carlos Bernal-Cardenas;Christopher Vendome

  • On the Equivalence of Information Retrieval Methods for Automated Traceability Link Recovery

    Rocco Oliveto;Malcom Gethers;Denys Poshyvanyk;Andrea De Lucia

  • The Impact of API Change- and Fault-Proneness on the User Ratings of Android Apps

    Gabriele Bavota;Mario Linares-Vasquez;Carlos Eduardo Bernal-Cardenas;Massimiliano Di Penta

Frequent Co-Authors

Mario Linares-Vasquez
Mario Linares-Vasquez Universidad de Los Andes
Gabriele Bavota
Gabriele Bavota Universita della Svizzera Italiana
Rocco Oliveto
Rocco Oliveto University of Molise
Massimiliano Di Penta
Massimiliano Di Penta University of Sannio
Andrea De Lucia
Andrea De Lucia University of Salerno
Andrian Marcus
Andrian Marcus The University of Texas at Dallas
Fabio Palomba
Fabio Palomba University of Salerno
Daniel M. German
Daniel M. German University of Victoria
Jane Cleland-Huang
Jane Cleland-Huang University of Notre Dame
Giuliano Antoniol
Giuliano Antoniol Polytechnique Montréal

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a variety of specialized fields and related career pathways. Many students consider broadening their expertise or switching paths through online degree programs, which offer flexibility and affordability.

For those interested in data protection and digital infrastructure, a cyber security degree online can provide essential skills for high-demand jobs. Alternatively, if you are drawn to the intersection of technology and business, a bachelors construction management equips graduates to oversee complex building projects in an evolving digital landscape.

Understanding costs is key. The cost of criminal justice degree is a frequent concern for prospective students, and exploring affordable programs can help minimize debt. For those with an interest in finance and analytics, choosing a cheap online accounting degree can pave the way toward versatile business careers.

Each of these pathways leverages the foundational skills gained in computer science, enhancing job prospects and salary potential across industries.

Best Scientists Citing Denys Poshyvanyk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles