World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
66
Citations
16668
World Ranking
2082
National Ranking
140

Patrick Jöckel publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick Jöckel sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 393 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Patrick Jöckel D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick Jöckel sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Patrick Jöckel is affiliated with the German Aerospace Center in Germany. Their research primarily spans the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences as well as Environmental Science. Within these broad fields, they focus extensively on Atmospheric Science and Global and Planetary Change, with additional work connected to Astronomy and Astrophysics, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, and Automotive Engineering.

The main topics that characterize their work include atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, atmospheric ozone and climate, as well as atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics. Further subjects of interest cover lightning and electromagnetic phenomena, atmospheric aerosols and clouds, climate variability and models, and meteorological phenomena and simulations.

Patrick Jöckel has contributed significantly to scientific literature with notable publications across various journals. Some recent papers include:

  • Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report, 2020, Elementa Science of the Anthropocene
  • Estimating CH 4, CO 2 and CO emissions from coal mining and industrial activities in the Upper Silesian Coal Basin using an aircraft-based mass balance approach, 2020, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • Cleaner Skies during the COVID-19 Lockdown, 2022, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Variation of lightning-ignited wildfire patterns under climate change, 2023, Nature Communications
  • Future trends in stratosphere-to-troposphere transport in CCMI models, 2020, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

Their publication venues reflect a concentration in key atmospheric and environmental science outlets. These include:

  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Geoscientific Model Development
  • Elementa Science of the Anthropocene
  • Nature Communications

Collaboration plays a prominent role in their research career. Frequent co-authors of Patrick Jöckel include Mariano Mertens, Francisco J. Pérez-Invernón, Francisco J. Gordillo-Vázquez, Volker Grewe, and Heidi Huntrieser.

Best Publications

  • The atmospheric chemistry general circulation model ECHAM5/MESSy1: consistent simulation of ozone from the surface to the mesosphere

    P. Jöckel;H. Tost;A. Pozzer;C. Brühl

  • Development cycle 2 of the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy2)

    Patrick Jöckel;Astrid Kerkweg;Andrea Pozzer;Rolf Sander

  • Review of the global models used within phase 1 of the Chemistry–Climate Model Initiative (CCMI)

    Olaf Morgenstern;Michaela I. Hegglin;Eugene Rozanov;Fiona M. O'Connor

  • Small Interannual Variability of Global Atmospheric Hydroxyl

    S. A. Montzka;M. Krol;M. Krol;E. Dlugokencky;B. Hall

  • Impact of stratospheric ozone on Southern Hemisphere circulation change: A multimodel assessment

    S.-W. Son.;E. P. Gerber;J. Perlwitz;J. Perlwitz;L. M. Polvani

  • Bacteria in the global atmosphere – Part 2: Modeling of emissions and transport between different ecosystems

    S. M. Burrows;T. Butler;P. Jöckel;H. Tost

  • Earth System Chemistry integrated Modelling (ESCiMo) with the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) version 2.51

    Patrick Jöckel;Holger Tost;Andrea Pozzer;Markus Kunze

  • Technical note: The Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) - a new approach towards Earth System Modeling

    P. Jöckel;R. Sander;A. Kerkweg;H. Tost

  • Technical note: A new comprehensive SCAVenging submodel for global atmospheric chemistry modelling

    H. Tost;P. J. Jöckel;A. Kerkweg;R. Sander

  • Atmospheric Composition Change: Climate-Chemistry Interactions

    I.S.A. Isaksen;C. Granier;C. Granier;G. Myhre;T. Berntsen

  • Technical note: The new comprehensive atmospheric chemistry module MECCA

    R. Sander;A. Kerkweg;P. Jöckel;J. Lelieveld

  • Global model simulations of the impact of ocean-going ships on aerosols, clouds, and the radiation budget

    Axel Lauer;Veronika Eyring;Johannes Hendricks;Patrick Jöckel

  • What does the global mean OH concentration tell us

    M. G. Lawrence;P. Jöckel;R. von Kuhlmann

  • Technical Note: An implementation of the dry removal processes DRY DEPosition and SEDImentation in the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy)

    A. Kerkweg;J. Buchholz;L.N. Ganzeveld;A. Pozzer

  • Multimodel assessment of the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere: Tropics and global trends

    A. Gettelman;M. I. Hegglin;S.-W. Son;Jung-Hyun Kim

  • Technical Note: Implementation of prescribed (OFFLEM), calculated (ONLEM), and pseudo-emissions (TNUDGE) of chemical species in the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy)

    A. Kerkweg;R. Sander;H. Tost;P. Jöckel

  • Lightning and convection parameterisations - uncertainties in global modelling

    H. Tost;P. J. Jöckel;J. Lelieveld

  • Multimodel climate and variability of the stratosphere

    N. Butchart;Andrew J. Charlton-Perez;I. Cionni;S. C. Hardiman

  • The atmospheric chemistry box model CAABA/MECCA-3.0

    Rolf Sander;Andreas Baumgaertner;Sergey Gromov;Hartwig Harder

  • Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: A critical review of changes in the tropospheric ozone burden and budget from 1850 to 2100

    A. T. Archibald;J. L. Neu;Y. F. Elshorbany;O. R. Cooper;O. R. Cooper

  • The impact of traffic emissions on atmospheric ozone and OH: results from QUANTIFY

    P. Hoor;J. Borken-Kleefeld;D. Caro;O. Dessens

Frequent Co-Authors

Volker Grewe
Volker Grewe German Aerospace Center
Andrea Pozzer
Andrea Pozzer Max Planck Institute for Chemistry
Martin Dameris
Martin Dameris German Aerospace Center
David A. Plummer
David A. Plummer Environment and Climate Change Canada
Olaf Morgenstern
Olaf Morgenstern National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research
Holger Tost
Holger Tost Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Douglas E. Kinnison
Douglas E. Kinnison National Center for Atmospheric Research
Eugene Rozanov
Eugene Rozanov Saint Petersburg State University
Carl A. M. Brenninkmeijer
Carl A. M. Brenninkmeijer Max Planck Institute for Chemistry
Jos Lelieveld
Jos Lelieveld Max Planck Institute for Chemistry

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond Environmental Sciences, numerous online degrees provide flexible, accredited options. Programs such as accredited eds to edd programs offer pathways for professionals aiming to transition into educational leadership or policy roles linked to environmental education.

Career flexibility can also come from interdisciplinary studies. An affordable online general studies degree allows students to tailor coursework in environmental topics alongside business, communication, or social sciences, broadening employment possibilities.

For those passionate about social impact, considering the cheapest dsw program available online can be a strategic move. This degree supports careers addressing environmental justice and community well-being, key aspects of sustainability and environmental sciences.

Additionally, if you are exploring foundational degrees before specializing further, selecting from the easiest bachelor's degree options may help ensure timely graduation, keeping you on track toward advanced studies or entry-level roles in the environmental sector.

Best Scientists Citing Patrick Jöckel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles