World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jonathan Williams

Jonathan Williams

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
83
Citations
22006
World Ranking
845
National Ranking
50

Jonathan Williams publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan Williams sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 500 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Jonathan Williams D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan Williams sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Global air pollution crossroads over the Mediterranean

    J. Lelieveld;H. Berresheim;S. Borrmann;P. J. Crutzen

  • Atmospheric oxidation capacity sustained by a tropical forest

    J. Lelieveld;T. M. Butler;J. N. Crowley;T. J. Dillon

  • The Indian Ocean Experiment: Widespread Air Pollution from South and Southeast Asia

    Jos Lelieveld;Paul J. Crutzen;V. Ramanathan;M. O. Andreae

  • Characterization of biomass burning emissions from cooking fires, peat, crop residue, and other fuels with high-resolution proton-transfer-reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometry

    C. E. Stockwell;P. R. Veres;P. R. Veres;J. Williams;R. J. Yokelson

  • Transport of Biomass Burning Smoke to the Upper Troposphere by Deep Convection in the Equatorial Region.

    M. O. Andreae;P. Artaxo;H. Fischer;S. R. Freitas

  • Global atmospheric budget of acetaldehyde: 3-D model analysis and constraints from in-situ and satellite observations

    D. B. Millet;A. Guenther;D. A. Siegel;N. B. Nelson

  • The Amazon Tall Tower Observatory (ATTO): overview of pilot measurements on ecosystem ecology, meteorology, trace gases, and aerosols

    M. O. Andreae;M. O. Andreae;O. C. Acevedo;A. Araùjo;P. Artaxo

  • Measurement of fine particulate and gas-phase species during the New Year's fireworks 2005 in Mainz, Germany

    Frank Drewnick;Silke S. Hings;Joachim Curtius;Gunter Eerdekens

  • CO 2 , CO, and CH 4 measurements from tall towers in the NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory's Global Greenhouse Gas Reference Network: instrumentation, uncertainty analysis, and recommendations for future high-accuracy greenhouse gas monitoring efforts

    A. E. Andrews;J. D. Kofler;J. D. Kofler;M. E. Trudeau;M. E. Trudeau;M. E. Trudeau;J. C. Williams

  • Evaluation of the global oceanic isoprene source and its impacts on marine organic carbon aerosol

    S.R. Arnold;D.V. Spracklen;J. Williams;N. Yassaa

  • Emissions lifetimes and ozone formation in power plant plumes

    T. B. Ryerson;M. P. Buhr;G. J. Frost;P. D. Goldan

  • Towards a quantitative understanding of total OH reactivity: A review

    Yudong Yang;Min Shao;Xuemei Wang;Anke C. Nölscher

  • The Comparative Reactivity Method ? a new tool to measure total OH Reactivity in ambient air

    V. Sinha;J. Williams;J. N. Crowley;J. Lelieveld

  • Atmospheric chemistry and distribution of formaldehyde and several multioxygenated carbonyl compounds during the 1995 Nashville/Middle Tennessee Ozone Study

    Y.-N. Lee;X. Zhou;L. I. Kleinman;L. J. Nunnermacker

  • New constraints on terrestrial and oceanic sources of atmospheric methanol

    D.B. Millet;D.B. Millet;Daniel J. Jacob;T.G. Custer;J.A. de Gouw

  • Ecosystem fluxes during drought and recovery in an experimental forest

    Unknown

  • Application of the variability-size relationship to atmospheric aerosol studies: estimating aerosol lifetimes and ages

    J. Williams;M. de Reus;R. Krejci;H. Fischer

  • The South Asian monsoon-pollution pump and purifier.

    Jos Lelieveld;Jos Lelieveld;Efstratios Bourtsoukidis;Christoph Brühl;Horst Fischer

  • Strong impact of wildfires on the abundance and aging of black carbon in the lowermost stratosphere

    Jeannine Ditas;Jeannine Ditas;Nan Ma;Nan Ma;Yuxuan Zhang;Denise Assmann

  • Increasing Ozone over the Atlantic Ocean

    J. Lelieveld;J. van Aardenne;H. Fischer;M. de Reus

Frequent Co-Authors

Jos Lelieveld
Jos Lelieveld Max Planck Institute for Chemistry
Herbert Fischer
Herbert Fischer Max Planck Society
Hartwig Harder
Hartwig Harder Max Planck Institute for Chemistry
John N. Crowley
John N. Crowley Max Planck Society
Vinayak Sinha
Vinayak Sinha Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Mohali
Monica Martinez
Monica Martinez Max Planck Institute for Chemistry
Valérie Gros
Valérie Gros Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Meinrat O. Andreae
Meinrat O. Andreae Max Planck Institute for Chemistry
Carsten Warneke
Carsten Warneke National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Thorsten Hoffmann
Thorsten Hoffmann Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to various interdisciplinary fields that address ecological challenges and sustainable development. For students seeking specialized knowledge in earth systems, a geoscience online degree offers in-depth training in geology, mineralogy, and environmental geology, which are critical for natural resource management and environmental consulting careers.

Geographic data is increasingly important in environmental decision-making, making a gis degree programs a practical option. Graduates can utilize spatial analysis and mapping tools to support environmental planning, conservation efforts, and disaster management initiatives.

For those interested in leadership roles within public sector or nonprofit organizations, pursuing a one year mpa program can provide essential skills in public administration, policy analysis, and resource management, driving community-centered environmental progress.

Understanding social dynamics is also key to effective environmental strategies. An online bachelors degree programs in sociology allow students to explore how human behaviors, cultural norms, and societal structures influence environmental policies and sustainable practices.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan Williams

Recently Published Articles