World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
49
Citations
8716
World Ranking
5253
National Ranking
348

Monica Martinez publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Monica Martinez sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 188 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Monica Martinez D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Monica Martinez sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Atmospheric oxidation capacity sustained by a tropical forest

    J. Lelieveld;T. M. Butler;J. N. Crowley;T. J. Dillon

  • Missing OH reactivity in a forest: evidence for unknown reactive biogenic VOCs.

    Piero Di Carlo;Piero Di Carlo;William H. Brune;Monica Martinez;Hartwig Harder

  • Selection of materials with potential in sensible thermal energy storage

    A.I. Fernandez;M. Martínez;M. Segarra;I. Martorell

  • Adsorption of perfluoroalkyl substances on microplastics under environmental conditions.

    Marta Llorca;Gabriella Schirinzi;Mònica Martínez;Damià Barceló

  • Atmospheric oxidation capacity in the summer of Houston 2006: Comparison with summer measurements in other metropolitan studies

    Jingqiu Mao;Xinrong Ren;Shuang Chen;William H. Brune

  • Ozone production rates as a function of NOx abundances and HOx production rates in the Nashville urban plume

    J. A. Thornton;P. J. Wooldridge;R. C. Cohen;R. C. Cohen;M. Martinez

  • A laser induced fluorescence instrument for detecting tropospheric OH and HO2: Characteristics and calibration

    Ian C. Faloona;David Tan;Robert L. Lesher;Nathan L. Hazen

  • OH and HO2 concentrations, sources, and loss rates during the Southern Oxidants Study in Nashville, Tennessee, summer 1999

    Monica Martinez;H. Harder;T. A. Kovacs;James B. Simpas

  • Quantification of the unknown HONO daytime source and its relation to NO 2

    M. Sörgel;E. Regelin;H. Bozem;J.-M. Diesch

  • Selection and characterization of recycled materials for sensible thermal energy storage

    M.E. Navarro;M. Martínez;A. Gil;A.I. Fernández

  • Improved simulation of isoprene oxidation chemistry with the ECHAM5/MESSy chemistry-climate model: lessons from the GABRIEL airborne field campaign

    T. M. Butler;D. Taraborrelli;C. Brühl;H. Fischer

  • Direct measurements of urban OH reactivity during Nashville SOS in summer 1999

    T. A. Kovacs;W. H. Brune;H. Harder;M. Martinez

  • Observation and modelling of HOx radicals in a boreal forest

    K. Hens;A. Novelli;M. Martinez;J. Auld;J. Auld

  • Direct observations of daytime NO3: Implications for urban boundary layer chemistry

    A. Geyer;B. Alicke;R. Ackermann;M. Martinez

  • HOx budgets during HOxComp: A case study of HOx chemistry under NOx-limited conditions

    Y F Elshorbany;Y F Elshorbany;J Kleffmann;A Hofzumahaus;R Kurtenbach

  • Hydroxyl radicals in the tropical troposphere over the Suriname rainforest: airborne measurements

    M. Martinez;H. Harder;D. Kubistin;M. Rudolf

  • Hydroxyl radicals in the tropical troposphere over the Suriname rainforest: comparison of measurements with the box model MECCA

    Dagmar Kubistin;H Harder;M Martinez;M Rudolf

  • Characterisation of an inlet pre-injector laser-induced fluorescence instrument for the measurement of atmospheric hydroxyl radicals

    A Novelli;K Hens;C. Tatum Ernest;Dagmar Kubistin;Dagmar Kubistin

  • Daytime formation of nitrous acid at a coastal remote site in Cyprus indicating a common ground source of atmospheric HONO and NO

    Hannah Meusel;Uwe Kuhn;Andreas Reiffs;Chinmay Mallik

  • Net ozone production and its relationship to nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds in the marine boundary layer around the Arabian Peninsula

    Ivan Tadic;John N. Crowley;Dirk Dienhart;Philipp Eger

Frequent Co-Authors

Hartwig Harder
Hartwig Harder Max Planck Institute for Chemistry
Jos Lelieveld
Jos Lelieveld Max Planck Institute for Chemistry
Jonathan Williams
Jonathan Williams Max Planck Society
William H. Brune
William H. Brune Pennsylvania State University
Herbert Fischer
Herbert Fischer Max Planck Society
Rolf Sander
Rolf Sander Max Planck Institute for Chemistry
John N. Crowley
John N. Crowley Max Planck Society
Richard E. Shetter
Richard E. Shetter National Center for Atmospheric Research
Vinayak Sinha
Vinayak Sinha Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Mohali
Birger Bohn
Birger Bohn Forschungszentrum Jülich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond traditional Environmental Sciences degrees, several related online pathways can enhance career prospects. Exploring the best online bachelors in sociology programs can provide valuable insights into human-environment interactions, community dynamics, and social policy—crucial areas for sustainability and environmental advocacy careers.

Advanced degrees are also available for professionals seeking leadership roles or specialized knowledge. For example, some candidates pursue fast-track options like 1 year phd programs online no dissertation, enabling quicker transitions into research, education, or policy-making roles without the traditional dissertation component.

If you currently hold a master's degree in education, the pathway from eds to edd program offers an opportunity to deepen expertise and leadership capabilities in educational environments focused on environmental literacy and sustainable curricula.

Additionally, those interested in social work’s role within environmental justice may consider fully funded dsw programs online. These programs prepare graduates to address systemic social and environmental challenges through informed policy and community-based solutions.

Best Scientists Citing Monica Martinez

Recently Published Articles