World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
69
Citations
11739
World Ranking
1827
National Ranking
769

Richard E. Shetter publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard E. Shetter sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 168 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Richard E. Shetter D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard E. Shetter sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard E. Shetter is affiliated with the National Center for Atmospheric Research in the United States. Their research work spans multiple scientific fields, primarily focusing on engineering and physics and astronomy.

The main fields of study represented in their work include:

  • Engineering
  • Physics and Astronomy

Within these broader areas, their subfields of study emphasize aerospace engineering as well as astronomy and astrophysics.

  • Aerospace Engineering
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics

Richard E. Shetter's work centers on topics relevant to space sciences and technology. These include:

  • Space exploration and regulation
  • Spacecraft Design and Technology
  • Space Exploration and Technology

The scientist has collaborated with several frequent co-authors, indicating engagement in multidisciplinary research teams. These co-authors are:

  • E. L. Schaller
  • J. Ryan Bennett
  • D. R. Blake
  • Raphael M. Kudela
  • B. L. Lefer

Publication venues for their research include the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, where at least one paper has been published.

  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society

One recent publication attributed to Richard E. Shetter is:

  • High-Flying Interns: NASA's Student Airborne Research Program (SARP), 2022, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society

Best Publications

  • Emissions from biomass burning in the Yucatan

    R. J. Yokelson;J. D. Crounse;P. F. DeCarlo;P. F. DeCarlo;T. Karl

  • Airborne measurement of OH reactivity during INTEX-B

    J. Mao;J. Mao;X. Ren;X. Ren;W. H. Brune;J. R. Olson

  • Automated fluorometric method for hydrogen peroxide in air

    Allan L. Lazrus;Gregory L. Kok;John A. Lind;Sonia N. Gitlin

  • Photolysis frequency measurements using actinic flux spectroradiometry during the PEM‐Tropics mission: Instrumentation description and some results

    Richard E. Shetter;Martin Müller

  • Carbon kinetic isotope effect in the oxidation of methane by the hydroxyl radical

    Christopher A. Cantrell;Richard E. Shetter;Anthony H. McDaniel;Jack G. Calvert

  • Ozone production rates as a function of NOx abundances and HOx production rates in the Nashville urban plume

    J. A. Thornton;P. J. Wooldridge;R. C. Cohen;R. C. Cohen;M. Martinez

  • Measurements and model simulations of the photostationary state during the Mauna Loa Observatory Photochemistry Experiment: Implications for radical concentrations and ozone production and loss rates

    B. A. Ridley;S. Madronich;R. B. Chatfield;J. G. Walega

  • Testing fast photochemical theory during TRACE‐P based on measurements of OH, HO2, and CH2O

    Jennifer R. Olson;J. H. Crawford;G. Chen;A. Fried

  • Photochemistry of HOx in the upper troposphere at northern midlatitudes

    L. Jaeglé;Daniel James Jacob;W. H. Brune;I. Faloona

  • OH and HO2 concentrations, sources, and loss rates during the Southern Oxidants Study in Nashville, Tennessee, summer 1999

    Monica Martinez;H. Harder;T. A. Kovacs;James B. Simpas

  • Unexpected high levels of NO observed at South Pole

    D. Davis;J. B. Nowak;G. Chen;M. Buhr

  • HOx chemistry during INTEX-A 2004: Observation, model calculation, and comparison with previous studies

    Xinrong Ren;Jennifer R. Olson;James H. Crawford;William H. Brune

  • Regional-scale chemical transport modeling in support of the analysis of observations obtained during the TRACE-P experiment

    G. R. Carmichael;Y. Tang;G. Kurata;I. Uno

  • Temperature-dependent formaldehyde cross sections in the near-ultraviolet spectral region

    Chris A. Cantrell;James A. Davidson;Anthony H. McDaniel;Richard E. Shetter

  • On the origin of tropospheric ozone and NOx over the tropical South Pacific

    Martin G. Schultz;Daniel James Jacob;Yuhang Wang;Yuhang Wang;Jennifer A. Logan

  • Photochemical modeling of hydroxyl and its relationship to other species during the Tropospheric OH Photochemistry Experiment

    S. A. McKeen;G. Mount;F. Eisele;E. Williams

  • Visible‐ultraviolet absorption cross sections for NO2 as a function of temperature

    J. A. Davidson;C. A. Cantrell;A. H. McDaniel;R. E. Shetter

  • South Pole NOx Chemistry: an assessment of factors controlling variability and absolute levels

    D. Davis;G. Chen;G. Chen;M. Buhr;J. Crawford

  • Direct Measurements of the Convective Recycling of the Upper Troposphere

    Timothy H. Bertram;Anne E. Perring;Paul J. Wooldridge;John D. Crounse

  • Direct observations of daytime NO3: Implications for urban boundary layer chemistry

    A. Geyer;B. Alicke;R. Ackermann;M. Martinez

  • Regional-scale chemical transport modeling in support of the analysis of observations obtained during the TRACE-P experiment : NASA global tropospheric experiment transport and chemical evolution over the pacific (TRACE-P): Measurements and analysis (TRACEP1)

    G. R. Carmichael;Y. Tang;G. Kurata;I. Uno

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher A. Cantrell
Christopher A. Cantrell University of Colorado Boulder
Barry Lefer
Barry Lefer National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Jack G. Calvert
Jack G. Calvert Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Donald R. Blake
Donald R. Blake University of California, Irvine
William H. Brune
William H. Brune Pennsylvania State University
Alan Fried
Alan Fried University of Colorado Boulder
James H. Crawford
James H. Crawford Langley Research Center
Brian G. Heikes
Brian G. Heikes University of Rhode Island
Samuel R. Hall
Samuel R. Hall National Center for Atmospheric Research
G. W. Sachse
G. W. Sachse Langley Research Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens doors to diverse career pathways, many of which can be enhanced through further education. For educators and professionals seeking advanced roles, exploring online ed d programs without dissertation can offer a flexible route to doctoral qualifications without the extensive research commitment.

Additionally, those holding an Education Specialist (EdS) degree might consider transitioning to a doctorate through an eds to edd bridge program. These programs provide a streamlined pathway to doctoral credentials, empowering professionals to expand their expertise and leadership in environmental education or policy.

For those interested in social dimensions of environmental sciences, online programs like online dsw programs in social work offer an affordable option to advance in fields that intersect social welfare and environmental advocacy. Such degrees are valuable for developing sustainable community programs and policies.

Finally, pursuing an affordable online general studies degree can also be a strategic starting point. These programs build a broad educational foundation, allowing students to tailor their studies towards environmental sciences and related interdisciplinary fields.

Best Scientists Citing Richard E. Shetter

Recently Published Articles