World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 62 2651 2529 1060 981 222 11766

Glenn M. Wolfe publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Glenn M. Wolfe between 1971 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Glenn M. Wolfe published across 56 years, from 1971 to 2026, averaging 4.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2020. 13 of the 271 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1971 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2020. 1971: 1 publication 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 25 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 30 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 16 publications 2025: 12 publications 2026: 1 publication
1971 2026

271 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Glenn M. Wolfe: publications per year, 1971 to 2026
Year Publications
1971 1
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 1
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 1
2003 1
2004 1
2005 1
2006 1
2007 3
2008 3
2009 7
2010 4
2011 7
2012 6
2013 13
2014 20
2015 20
2016 25
2017 18
2018 17
2019 15
2020 30
2021 17
2022 19
2023 11
2024 16
2025 12
2026 1
Total 271
Download as CSV

Glenn M. Wolfe publications per year - data summary

  • Glenn M. Wolfe, a Environmental Sciences scholar from University of Maryland, Baltimore County, has 271 publications recorded across 56 years, from 1971 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1971 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2020, with 30 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1971, 1993, 2002, 2003 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 29 of the 56 years in the span carry no publications at all (1972, 1973, 1974, 1975 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 4.8 papers per year over the whole span, or 10.0 per year counting only the 27 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 59 publications, 22% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1971-1989: 1 publication (0.1 per year); 1990-2008: 12 publications (0.6 per year); 2009-2026: 258 publications (14.3 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Glenn M. Wolfe publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Glenn M. Wolfe sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 221–230 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 222 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263 222
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Glenn M. Wolfe publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 9,676 Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 66 ranges running from 41–50 to 690+ publications.
  • Glenn M. Wolfe, a Environmental Sciences scholar from University of Maryland, Baltimore County, records 222 publications - the 71st percentile of the discipline.
  • 71% of ranked Environmental Sciences scientists score the same or lower than Glenn M. Wolfe, and about 29% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 161–170 publications range, and Glenn M. Wolfe ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 121–130 publications, holding 617 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 67% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 690 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Glenn M. Wolfe D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Glenn M. Wolfe sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143 62
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Glenn M. Wolfe D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 9,676 Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 30 to 126+ D-Index.
  • Glenn M. Wolfe, a Environmental Sciences scholar from University of Maryland, Baltimore County, records 62 D-Index - the 74th percentile of the discipline.
  • 74% of ranked Environmental Sciences scientists score the same or lower than Glenn M. Wolfe, and about 26% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 51 D-Index range, and Glenn M. Wolfe ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 45 D-Index, holding 348 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 54 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more, 92 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Glenn M. Wolfe is affiliated with the University of Maryland, Baltimore County in the United States. Their research focuses on Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science, with a particular emphasis on Atmospheric Science and Global and Planetary Change.

The scientist's work extensively covers topics related to atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, atmospheric ozone and climate, and atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics. Air quality and health impacts as well as atmospheric aerosols and clouds also feature prominently in their research interests. Additional topics include air quality monitoring and forecasting, along with fire effects on ecosystems.

Recent publications by Glenn M. Wolfe include:

  • Global airborne sampling reveals a previously unobserved dimethyl sulfide oxidation mechanism in the marine atmosphere, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Ozone chemistry in western U.S. wildfire plumes, 2021, Science Advances
  • Revisiting the effectiveness of HCHO/NO2 ratios for inferring ozone sensitivity to its precursors using high resolution airborne remote sensing observations in a high ozone episode during the KORUS-AQ campaign, 2020, Atmospheric Environment
  • Secondary organic aerosols from anthropogenic volatile organic compounds contribute substantially to air pollution mortality, 2021, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • The NASA Atmospheric Tomography (ATom) Mission: Imaging the Chemistry of the Global Atmosphere, 2021, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Glenn M. Wolfe include:

  • T. F. Hanisco
  • Glenn S. Diskin
  • Jason M. St. Clair
  • Jeff Peischl
  • D. R. Blake

The scientist has published extensively in well-known venues with multiple contributions to Atmospheric chemistry and physics, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Atmospheric Environment, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, and Environmental Research Letters.

Their publications number in the dozens, reflecting consistent contributions primarily in the fields of Atmospheric Science and Global and Planetary Change. The integration of research topics ranging from atmospheric ozone phenomena to air quality impacts demonstrates a broad scope within environmental and atmospheric sciences.

Best Publications

  • A large atomic chlorine source inferred from mid-continental reactive nitrogen chemistry

    Joel A. Thornton;James P. Kercher;Theran P. Riedel;Nicholas L. Wagner

  • Why do models overestimate surface ozone in the Southeast United States

    Katherine R. Travis;Daniel J. Jacob;Jenny A. Fisher;Patrick S. Kim

  • The Framework for 0-D Atmospheric Modeling (F0AM) v3.1

    Glenn M. Wolfe;Glenn M. Wolfe;Margaret R. Marvin;Sandra J. Roberts;Katherine R. Travis

  • Aqueous-phase mechanism for secondary organic aerosol formation from isoprene: application to the southeast United States and co-benefit of SO2 emission controls

    Eloise A Marais;Daniel J Jacob;Jose L Jimenez;Jose L Jimenez;Pedro Campuzano-Jost;Pedro Campuzano-Jost

  • Global airborne sampling reveals a previously unobserved dimethyl sulfide oxidation mechanism in the marine atmosphere.

    Patrick R. Veres;J. Andrew Neuman;J. Andrew Neuman;Timothy H. Bertram;Emmanuel Assaf;Emmanuel Assaf

  • Airborne measurements of western U.S. wildfire emissions: Comparison with prescribed burning and air quality implications

    Xiaoxi Liu;Xiaoxi Liu;Xiaoxi Liu;L. Gregory Huey;Robert J. Yokelson;Vanessa Selimovic

  • Rapid deposition of oxidized biogenic compounds to a temperate forest

    Tran B. Nguyen;John D. Crounse;Alex P. Teng;Jason M. St. Clair

  • Insights into hydroxyl measurements and atmospheric oxidation in a California forest

    J. Mao;J. Mao;X. Ren;L. Zhang;D. M. Van Duin

  • Organic nitrate chemistry and its implications for nitrogen budgets in an isoprene- and monoterpene-rich atmosphere: constraints from aircraft (SEAC 4 RS) and ground-based (SOAS) observations in the Southeast US

    Jenny A. Fisher;Daniel J. Jacob;Katherine R. Travis;Patrick S. Kim

  • Ozone chemistry in western U.S. wildfire plumes

    Unknown

  • Missing gas-phase source of HONO inferred from Zeppelin measurements in the troposphere.

    Xin Li;Franz Rohrer;Andreas Hofzumahaus;Theo Brauers

  • Formaldehyde Production from Isoprene Oxidation Across NOx Regimes

    G. M. Wolfe;G. M. Wolfe;J. Kaiser;T. F. Hanisco;F. N. Keutsch

  • The effect of varying levels of surfactant on the reactive uptake of N 2 O 5 to aqueous aerosol

    V. F. McNeill;J. Patterson;G. M. Wolfe;J. A. Thornton

  • The oxidation of oleate in submicron aqueous salt aerosols: evidence of a surface process.

    V. Faye McNeill;Glenn M. Wolfe;Joel A. Thornton

  • Observational insights into aerosol formation from isoprene

    David R. Worton;Jason D. Surratt;Brian W. Lafranchi;Brian W. Lafranchi;Arthur W.H. Chan

  • Observing atmospheric formaldehyde (HCHO) from space: validation and intercomparison of six retrievals from four satellites (OMI, GOME2A, GOME2B, OMPS) with SEAC4RS aircraft observations over the Southeast US.

    Lei Zhu;Daniel J. Jacob;Patrick S. Kim;Jenny A. Fisher

  • Agricultural fires in the southeastern U.S. during SEAC4RS: emissions of trace gases and particles and evolution of ozone, reactive nitrogen, and organic aerosol.

    Xiaoxi Liu;Y. Zhang;L. G. Huey;R. J. Yokelson

  • Closing the peroxy acetyl nitrate budget: observations of acyl peroxy nitrates (PAN, PPN, and MPAN) during BEARPEX 2007

    B. W. LaFranchi;G. M. Wolfe;J. A. Thornton;S. A. Harrold

  • The Chemistry of Atmosphere-Forest Exchange (CAFE) Model – Part 1: Model description and characterization

    G. M. Wolfe;J. A. Thornton

  • An MCM modeling study of nitryl chloride (ClNO 2 ) impacts on oxidation, ozone production and nitrogen oxide partitioning in polluted continental outflow

    T. P. Riedel;T. P. Riedel;G. M. Wolfe;G. M. Wolfe;K. T. Danas;J. B. Gilman;J. B. Gilman

  • Revisiting the effectiveness of HCHO/NO2 ratios for inferring ozone sensitivity to its precursors using high resolution airborne remote sensing observations in a high ozone episode during the KORUS-AQ campaign

    Amir H. Souri;Caroline R. Nowlan;Glenn M. Wolfe;Glenn M. Wolfe;Lok N. Lamsal

  • Mapping hydroxyl variability throughout the global remote troposphere via synthesis of airborne and satellite formaldehyde observations.

    Glenn M. Wolfe;Glenn M. Wolfe;Julie M. Nicely;Julie M. Nicely;Jason M. St. Clair;Jason M. St. Clair;Thomas F. Hanisco

  • ATom: Merged Atmospheric Chemistry, Trace Gases, and Aerosols

    S.C. Wofsy;S. Afshar;H.M. Allen;E.C. Apel

  • Forest-atmosphere exchange of ozone: sensitivity to very reactive biogenic VOC emissions and implications for in-canopy photochemistry

    G. M. Wolfe;G. M. Wolfe;J. A. Thornton;M. McKay;M. McKay;A. H. Goldstein

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas F. Hanisco
Thomas F. Hanisco Goddard Space Flight Center
Jeff Peischl
Jeff Peischl Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences
Frank N. Keutsch
Frank N. Keutsch Harvard University
Carsten Warneke
Carsten Warneke National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Martin Graus
Martin Graus University of Innsbruck
Jessica B. Gilman
Jessica B. Gilman National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Patrick R. Veres
Patrick R. Veres National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Joel A. Thornton
Joel A. Thornton University of Washington
Steven S. Brown
Steven S. Brown National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
John D. Crounse
John D. Crounse California Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their environmental science expertise, pursuing further education through specialized online programs can open new career opportunities. Many students explore pathways such as the online eds to edd bridge program to transition from education roles into leadership positions focused on sustainability and environmental policy.

Social work also intersects with environmental justice, making fully funded dsw programs an attractive option for professionals aiming to address community-based environmental challenges through social services and advocacy.

For those seeking flexible and cost-effective options, a budget friendly online general studies degree allows students to tailor coursework around environmental disciplines while balancing other commitments.

Finally, if you are beginning your education journey, considering one of the easiest bachelor's degree programs can provide a manageable entry point for gaining foundational knowledge needed for more advanced environmental studies and career growth.

Best Scientists Citing Glenn M. Wolfe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles