World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
51
Citations
12010
World Ranking
2553
National Ranking
441

Richard Amlôt publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Amlôt sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 233 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Richard Amlôt D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Amlôt sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard Amlôt is affiliated with Public Health England in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple disciplines, primarily within the fields of psychology, social sciences, and medicine. The focus on subfields includes clinical psychology, sociology and political science, health, general health professions, and infectious diseases.

Their work covers several key topics including:

  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • COVID-19 Epidemiological Studies
  • Disaster Response and Management
  • Disaster Management and Resilience
  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions

Amlôt has contributed to research published in numerous venues, frequently appearing in:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • BMC Public Health
  • BMJ Open
  • Public Health
  • International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Amlôt include:

  • COVID-19 vaccination intention in the UK: results from the COVID-19 vaccination acceptability study (CoVAccS), a nationally representative cross-sectional survey, 2020, Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
  • Applying principles of behaviour change to reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission, 2020, Nature Human Behaviour
  • Adherence to the test, trace, and isolate system in the UK: results from 37 nationally representative surveys, 2021, BMJ
  • Factors associated with adherence to self-isolation and lockdown measures in the UK: a cross-sectional survey, 2020, Public Health
  • Harnessing behavioural science in public health campaigns to maintain 'social distancing' in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: key principles, 2020, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health

The scientist often collaborates with several scholars, including:

  • G. James Rubin
  • Louise Smith
  • Lucy Yardley
  • Isabel Oliver
  • Susan Michie

Best Publications

  • Public perceptions, anxiety, and behaviour change in relation to the swine flu outbreak: cross sectional telephone survey

    G James Rubin;Richard Amlôt;Lisa Page;Simon Wessely

  • COVID-19 vaccination intention in the UK: results from the COVID-19 vaccination acceptability study (CoVAccS), a nationally representative cross-sectional survey.

    Susan Mary Sherman;Louise E. Smith;Julius Sim;Richard Amlôt;Richard Amlôt

  • Applying principles of behaviour change to reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission.

    Robert West;Susan Michie;G. James Rubin;Richard Amlôt

  • A Systematic, Thematic Review of Social and Occupational Factors Associated With Psychological Outcomes in Healthcare Employees During an Infectious Disease Outbreak.

    Samantha Kelly Brooks;Rebecca Dunn;Richard Amlôt;Gideon James Rubin

  • A systematic review of factors affecting vaccine uptake in young children

    Louise E. Smith;Richard Amlôt;John Weinman;Jenny Yiend

  • What Do We Mean by ‘Community Resilience’? A Systematic Literature Review of How It Is Defined in the Literature

    Sonny Sunilkumar Patel;Marian Brooke Rogers;Richard Amlot;Gideon James Rubin

  • Adherence to the test, trace, and isolate system in the UK: results from 37 nationally representative surveys.

    Louise E Smith;Henry W W Potts;Richard Amlôt;Richard Amlôt;Nicola T Fear

  • Psychological resilience and post-traumatic growth in disaster-exposed organisations: overview of the literature

    Samantha Kelly Brooks;Richard Amlot;Gideon James Rubin;Neil Greenberg

  • The effects of flooding on mental health: Outcomes and recommendations from a review of the literature

    Carla Stanke;Virginia Murray;Richard Amlôt;Jo Nurse

  • Facilitating Collective Psychosocial Resilience in the Public in Emergencies: Twelve Recommendations Based on the Social Identity Approach.

    John Drury;Holly Carter;Chris Cocking;Evangelos Ntontis;Evangelos Ntontis

  • Social and occupational factors associated with psychological distress and disorder among disaster responders: a systematic review.

    Samantha K. Brooks;Rebecca Dunn;Richard Amlôt;Neil Greenberg

  • Secondary stressors and extreme events and disasters: a systematic review of primary research from 2010-2011.

    Sarah Lock;G James Rubin;Virginia Murray;M Brooke Rogers

  • Psychosocial impact of the summer 2007 floods in England

    Shantini Paranjothy;John Edward Gallacher;Richard Amlôt;G James Rubin

  • Harnessing behavioural science in public health campaigns to maintain 'social distancing' in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: key principles.

    Chris Bonell;Susan Michie;Stephen Reicher;Robert West

  • Risk and resilience factors affecting the psychological wellbeing of individuals deployed in humanitarian relief roles after a disaster.

    Samantha K Brooks;Rebecca Dunn;Clara A M Sage;Richard Amlôt

  • What is the value of health emergency preparedness exercises? A scoping review study

    Elena Skryabina;Gabriel Reedy;Richard Amlôt;Peter Jaye

  • Mediating the social and psychological impacts of terrorist attacks: The role of risk perception and risk communication

    M. Brooke Rogers;Richard Amlôt;G. James Rubin;Simon Wessely

  • Effect of evacuation and displacement on the association between flooding and mental health outcomes: a cross-sectional analysis of UK survey data

    Alice Munro;R Sari Kovats;G James Rubin;Thomas David Waite

  • Infection prevention behaviour and infectious disease modelling: a review of the literature and recommendations for the future

    Dale Weston;Katharina Hauck;Richard Amlôt

  • A systematic review of infectious illness Presenteeism: prevalence, reasons and risk factors.

    Rebecca Katie Webster;Rebecca Katie Webster;Rebecca Katie Webster;Regina Liu;Kristina Karimullina;Ian Hall;Ian Hall

  • The English national cohort study of flooding and health: cross-sectional analysis of mental health outcomes at year one.

    Thomas David Waite;Katerina Chaintarli;Charles R. Beck;Charles R. Beck;Angie Bone

  • The role of religious fundamentalism in terrorist violence: A social psychological analysis

    M. Brooke Rogers;Kate M. Loewenthal;Christopher Alan Lewis;Richard Amlôt

Frequent Co-Authors

G. James Rubin
G. James Rubin King's College London
John Drury
John Drury University of Sussex
Lucy Yardley
Lucy Yardley University of Bristol
Simon Wessely
Simon Wessely King's College London
Susan Michie
Susan Michie University College London
Neil Greenberg
Neil Greenberg King's College London
Nick Sevdalis
Nick Sevdalis King's College London
Paul Little
Paul Little University of Southampton
Samantha K. Brooks
Samantha K. Brooks King's College London
Henry W. W. Potts
Henry W. W. Potts University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities opens up a wide range of flexible career opportunities. For those interested in social work, there are options such as the cheapest online master's in social work, making advanced study more accessible and affordable. Accelerated learning paths are also available, with choices like the social work accelerated program for students eager to begin their professional journey sooner.

Psychology is another popular field, with flexible programs like the 2-year psychology degree online designed for those looking to graduate quickly and start gaining experience. For individuals pursuing behavior analysis, accredited online programs are essential for professional certification; options such as bcba accredited programs online help prepare graduates for in-demand roles.

Choosing an affordable, reputable, and accredited online degree is crucial for long-term career success in these fields. Explore these program pathways to find the best fit for your goals and budget.

Best Scientists Citing Richard Amlôt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles