World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 51 2553 2328 441 397 233 12010

Richard Amlôt publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Richard Amlôt between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Richard Amlôt published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 13.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 56 publications in 2022. 35 of the 306 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 56. Peak 56 publications in 2022. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 35 publications 2021: 45 publications 2022: 56 publications 2023: 31 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 17 publications
2003 2025

306 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Richard Amlôt: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 0
2005 2
2006 1
2007 2
2008 3
2009 2
2010 6
2011 6
2012 10
2013 9
2014 16
2015 4
2016 6
2017 11
2018 11
2019 14
2020 35
2021 45
2022 56
2023 31
2024 18
2025 17
Total 306
Download as CSV

Richard Amlôt publications per year - data summary

  • Richard Amlôt, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Public Health England, has 306 publications recorded across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2003 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2022, with 56 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 2003 and 2006, with 1 publication each.
  • 1 of the 23 years in the span carries no publications at all (2004).
  • The rate of publication averages 13.3 papers per year over the whole span, or 13.9 per year counting only the 22 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 167 publications, 55% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2003-2010: 17 publications (2.1 per year); 2011-2018: 73 publications (9.1 per year); 2019-2025: 216 publications (30.9 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Richard Amlôt publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Amlôt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 224–233 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 233 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213 233
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Richard Amlôt publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 44–53 to 570+ publications.
  • Richard Amlôt, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Public Health England, records 233 publications - the 75th percentile of the discipline.
  • 75% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Richard Amlôt, and about 25% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 164–173 publications range, and Richard Amlôt ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 114–123 publications, holding 474 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 174–183 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 570 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Richard Amlôt D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Amlôt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166 51
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Richard Amlôt D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 71 ranges running from 30 to 100+ D-Index.
  • Richard Amlôt, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Public Health England, records 51 D-Index - the 68th percentile of the discipline.
  • 68% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Richard Amlôt, and about 32% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 45 D-Index range, and Richard Amlôt ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 313 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more, 97 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Richard Amlôt is affiliated with Public Health England in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple disciplines, primarily within the fields of psychology, social sciences, and medicine. The focus on subfields includes clinical psychology, sociology and political science, health, general health professions, and infectious diseases.

Their work covers several key topics including:

  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • COVID-19 Epidemiological Studies
  • Disaster Response and Management
  • Disaster Management and Resilience
  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions

Amlôt has contributed to research published in numerous venues, frequently appearing in:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • BMC Public Health
  • BMJ Open
  • Public Health
  • International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Amlôt include:

  • COVID-19 vaccination intention in the UK: results from the COVID-19 vaccination acceptability study (CoVAccS), a nationally representative cross-sectional survey, 2020, Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
  • Applying principles of behaviour change to reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission, 2020, Nature Human Behaviour
  • Adherence to the test, trace, and isolate system in the UK: results from 37 nationally representative surveys, 2021, BMJ
  • Factors associated with adherence to self-isolation and lockdown measures in the UK: a cross-sectional survey, 2020, Public Health
  • Harnessing behavioural science in public health campaigns to maintain 'social distancing' in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: key principles, 2020, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health

The scientist often collaborates with several scholars, including:

  • G. James Rubin
  • Louise Smith
  • Lucy Yardley
  • Isabel Oliver
  • Susan Michie

Best Publications

  • Public perceptions, anxiety, and behaviour change in relation to the swine flu outbreak: cross sectional telephone survey

    G James Rubin;Richard Amlôt;Lisa Page;Simon Wessely

  • Applying principles of behaviour change to reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission.

    Robert West;Susan Michie;G. James Rubin;Richard Amlôt

  • A Systematic, Thematic Review of Social and Occupational Factors Associated With Psychological Outcomes in Healthcare Employees During an Infectious Disease Outbreak.

    Samantha Kelly Brooks;Rebecca Dunn;Richard Amlôt;Gideon James Rubin

  • A systematic review of factors affecting vaccine uptake in young children

    Louise E. Smith;Richard Amlôt;John Weinman;Jenny Yiend

  • What Do We Mean by ‘Community Resilience’? A Systematic Literature Review of How It Is Defined in the Literature

    Sonny Sunilkumar Patel;Marian Brooke Rogers;Richard Amlot;Gideon James Rubin

  • Adherence to the test, trace, and isolate system in the UK: results from 37 nationally representative surveys.

    Louise E Smith;Henry W W Potts;Richard Amlôt;Richard Amlôt;Nicola T Fear

  • The effects of flooding on mental health: Outcomes and recommendations from a review of the literature

    Carla Stanke;Virginia Murray;Richard Amlôt;Jo Nurse

  • Facilitating Collective Psychosocial Resilience in the Public in Emergencies: Twelve Recommendations Based on the Social Identity Approach.

    John Drury;Holly Carter;Chris Cocking;Evangelos Ntontis;Evangelos Ntontis

  • Social and occupational factors associated with psychological distress and disorder among disaster responders: a systematic review.

    Samantha K. Brooks;Rebecca Dunn;Richard Amlôt;Neil Greenberg

  • Secondary stressors and extreme events and disasters: a systematic review of primary research from 2010-2011.

    Sarah Lock;G James Rubin;Virginia Murray;M Brooke Rogers

  • Psychosocial impact of the summer 2007 floods in England

    Shantini Paranjothy;John Edward Gallacher;Richard Amlôt;G James Rubin

  • Harnessing behavioural science in public health campaigns to maintain 'social distancing' in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: key principles.

    Chris Bonell;Susan Michie;Stephen Reicher;Robert West

  • Risk and resilience factors affecting the psychological wellbeing of individuals deployed in humanitarian relief roles after a disaster.

    Samantha K Brooks;Rebecca Dunn;Clara A M Sage;Richard Amlôt

  • What is the value of health emergency preparedness exercises? A scoping review study

    Elena Skryabina;Gabriel Reedy;Richard Amlôt;Peter Jaye

  • Mediating the social and psychological impacts of terrorist attacks: The role of risk perception and risk communication

    M. Brooke Rogers;Richard Amlôt;G. James Rubin;Simon Wessely

  • Effect of evacuation and displacement on the association between flooding and mental health outcomes: a cross-sectional analysis of UK survey data

    Alice Munro;R Sari Kovats;G James Rubin;Thomas David Waite

  • Infection prevention behaviour and infectious disease modelling: a review of the literature and recommendations for the future

    Dale Weston;Katharina Hauck;Richard Amlôt

  • A systematic review of infectious illness Presenteeism: prevalence, reasons and risk factors.

    Rebecca Katie Webster;Rebecca Katie Webster;Rebecca Katie Webster;Regina Liu;Kristina Karimullina;Ian Hall;Ian Hall

  • The English national cohort study of flooding and health: cross-sectional analysis of mental health outcomes at year one.

    Thomas David Waite;Katerina Chaintarli;Charles R. Beck;Charles R. Beck;Angie Bone

  • The role of religious fundamentalism in terrorist violence: A social psychological analysis

    M. Brooke Rogers;Kate M. Loewenthal;Christopher Alan Lewis;Richard Amlôt

Frequent Co-Authors

G. James Rubin
G. James Rubin King's College London
John Drury
John Drury University of Sussex
Lucy Yardley
Lucy Yardley University of Bristol
Simon Wessely
Simon Wessely King's College London
Susan Michie
Susan Michie University College London
Neil Greenberg
Neil Greenberg King's College London
Nick Sevdalis
Nick Sevdalis King's College London
Paul Little
Paul Little University of Southampton
Samantha K. Brooks
Samantha K. Brooks King's College London
Henry W. W. Potts
Henry W. W. Potts University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities opens up a wide range of flexible career opportunities. For those interested in social work, there are options such as the cheapest online master's in social work, making advanced study more accessible and affordable. Accelerated learning paths are also available, with choices like the social work accelerated program for students eager to begin their professional journey sooner.

Psychology is another popular field, with flexible programs like the 2-year psychology degree online designed for those looking to graduate quickly and start gaining experience. For individuals pursuing behavior analysis, accredited online programs are essential for professional certification; options such as bcba accredited programs online help prepare graduates for in-demand roles.

Choosing an affordable, reputable, and accredited online degree is crucial for long-term career success in these fields. Explore these program pathways to find the best fit for your goals and budget.

Best Scientists Citing Richard Amlôt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles