World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 53 2298 2091 1 1 236 11195

Li Ping Wong publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Li Ping Wong between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Li Ping Wong published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 12.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 41 publications in 2020. 36 of the 289 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 41. Peak 41 publications in 2020. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 20 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 41 publications 2021: 37 publications 2022: 23 publications 2023: 17 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 19 publications
2003 2025

289 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Li Ping Wong: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 1
2005 0
2006 0
2007 4
2008 8
2009 6
2010 14
2011 17
2012 7
2013 6
2014 7
2015 5
2016 12
2017 13
2018 20
2019 14
2020 41
2021 37
2022 23
2023 17
2024 17
2025 19
Total 289
Download as CSV

Li Ping Wong publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Li Ping Wong sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 234–243 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 236 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170 236
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Li Ping Wong D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Li Ping Wong sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141 53
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Li Ping Wong is affiliated with the University of Malaya in Malaysia, specializing primarily in the field of Medicine. Their research covers several important subfields including Epidemiology, Health, Clinical Psychology, Infectious Diseases, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

Their scholarly work spans numerous topics, with a notable concentration on Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy, COVID-19 and Mental Health, SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research, Hepatitis B Virus Studies, Cervical Cancer and HPV Research, COVID-19 epidemiological studies, and Cancer survivorship and care.

Li Ping Wong has contributed many publications to journals that frequently appear in their portfolio. These include Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, Frontiers in Public Health, Vaccines, PLoS ONE, and The Journal of Headache and Pain.

Several coauthors have collaborated extensively with Li Ping Wong, including:

  • Haridah Alias
  • Yulan Lin
  • Zhijian Hu
  • Hai Yen Lee
  • Qinjian Zhao

Some of the recent research papers authored or coauthored by Li Ping Wong include:

  • The use of the health belief model to assess predictors of intent to receive the COVID-19 vaccine and willingness to pay (2020), Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
  • Understanding COVID-19 vaccine demand and hesitancy: A nationwide online survey in China (2020), PLoS neglected tropical diseases
  • Knowledge, Attitudes, Impact, and Anxiety Regarding COVID-19 Infection Among the Public in China (2020), Frontiers in Public Health
  • Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccine Uptake and the Willingness to Receive the HPV Vaccination among Female College Students in China: A Multicenter Study (2020), Vaccines
  • Influence of Mass and Social Media on Psychobehavioral Responses Among Medical Students During the Downward Trend of COVID-19 in Fujian, China: Cross-Sectional Study (2020), Journal of Medical Internet Research

Best Publications

  • Focus group discussion: a tool for health and medical research.

    Wong Lp

  • Understanding COVID-19 vaccine demand and hesitancy: A nationwide online survey in China.

    Yulan Lin;Zhijian Hu;Qinjian Zhao;Haridah Alias

  • Data Analysis in Qualitative Research: A Brief Guide to Using Nvivo

    LP Wong

  • Knowledge and awareness of cervical cancer and screening among Malaysian women who have never had a Pap smear: a qualitative study.

    L P Wong;Y L Wong;W Y Low;E M Khoo

  • Factors influencing registered nurses perception of their overall job satisfaction: a qualitative study

    N. Atefi;K.L. Abdullah;L.P. Wong;R. Mazlom

  • Dysmenorrhea in a multiethnic population of adolescent Asian girls

    Li Ping Wong;Ee Ming Khoo

  • Ethnically diverse female university students' knowledge and attitudes toward human papillomavirus (HPV), HPV vaccination and cervical cancer.

    Li Ping Wong;I-Ching Sam

  • Knowledge, Attitudes, Impact, and Anxiety Regarding COVID-19 Infection Among the Public in China

    Yulan Lin;Zhijian Hu;Haridah Alias;Li Ping Wong

  • Factors Affecting Dengue Prevention Practices: Nationwide Survey of the Malaysian Public

    Li Ping Wong;Sharina Mahavera Mohamad Shakir;Narges Atefi;Sazaly AbuBakar

  • An exploration of knowledge, attitudes and behaviours of young multiethnic Muslim-majority society in Malaysia in relation to reproductive and premarital sexual practices.

    Li Ping Wong

  • Health beliefs and practices related to dengue fever: a focus group study.

    Li Ping Wong;Sazaly AbuBakar

  • HIV/AIDS-Related Knowledge Among Malaysian Young Adults: Findings From a Nationwide Survey.

    Li Ping Wong;Caroline-Kwong Leng Chin;Wah Yun Low;Nasruddin Jaafar

  • Cervical cancer screening attitudes and beliefs of Malaysian women who have never had a pap smear: a qualitative study.

    L. P. Wong;Y. L. Wong;W. Y. Low;E. M. Khoo

  • Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccine Uptake and the Willingness to Receive the HPV Vaccination among Female College Students in China: A Multicenter Study.

    Dingyun You;Liyuan Han;Lian Li;Jingcen Hu

  • Influence of Mass and Social Media on Psychobehavioral Responses Among Medical Students During the Downward Trend of COVID-19 in Fujian, China: Cross-Sectional Study.

    Yulan Lin;Zhijian Hu;Haridah Alias;Li Ping Wong;Li Ping Wong

  • Urban heat island experience, control measures and health impact: A survey among working community in the city of Kuala Lumpur

    Li Ping Wong;Haridah Alias;Nasrin Aghamohammadi;Sima Aghazadeh

  • Public perceptions and attitudes toward thalassaemia: Influencing factors in a multi-racial population.

    Li Ping Wong;Elizabeth George;Jin-Ai Mary Anne Tan

  • Escalating progression of mental health disorders during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from a nationwide survey.

    Li Ping Wong;Haridah Alias;Afiqah Alyaa Md Fuzi;Intan Sofia Omar

  • Attitudes towards dysmenorrhoea, impact and treatment seeking among adolescent girls: A rural school‐based survey

    Li Ping Wong

  • Practices of Dengue Fever Prevention and the Associated Factors among the Orang Asli in Peninsular Malaysia

    Josephine Rebecca Chandren;Li Ping Wong;Sazaly AbuBakar

  • Knowledge and attitudes about HPV infection, HPV vaccination, and cervical cancer among rural southeast Asian women.

    Li Ping Wong

  • Menstrual-related attitudes and symptoms among multi-racial Asian adolescent females.

    Li Ping Wong;Ee Ming Khoo

Frequent Co-Authors

Gregory D. Zimet
Gregory D. Zimet Indiana University
Sazaly AbuBakar
Sazaly AbuBakar University of Malaya
Liyuan Han
Liyuan Han Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Aziz Sheikh
Aziz Sheikh University of Oxford
Shiwei Duan
Shiwei Duan Ningbo University
Yvonne A. L. Lim
Yvonne A. L. Lim University of Malaya
Frederick L. Altice
Frederick L. Altice Yale University
Chim C. Lang
Chim C. Lang University of Dundee
Adeeba Kamarulzaman
Adeeba Kamarulzaman University of Malaya
Guillermo I. Perez-Perez
Guillermo I. Perez-Perez New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The landscape for studying Social Sciences and Humanities online has never been more diverse, flexible, or affordable. From psychology to education, students now have access to high-quality programs designed to fit diverse schedules and career goals.

If cost is a concern, you can explore how much does a masters in psychology cost and compare programs that offer both value and quality. Those aiming for leadership in education might consider the easiest edd programs, which help accelerate your journey toward advanced educational roles.

For students seeking efficiency, pursuing a master degree online can lead to new opportunities in just a year. Alternatively, undergraduates looking to join the workforce quickly may benefit from an accelerated bachelor's degree—a fast track to your chosen field.

Whether you are enhancing your qualifications or making a career change, online programs in the Social Sciences and Humanities offer a flexible pathway tailored to your aspirations and lifestyle.

Best Scientists Citing Li Ping Wong

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles