World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 44 7022 6549 701 669 108 6818

Laura A.V. Marlow publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Laura A.V. Marlow between 2006 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Laura A.V. Marlow published across 21 years, from 2006 to 2026, averaging 6.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2021. 4 of the 138 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2021. 2006: 1 publication 2007: 4 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 3 publications 2026: 1 publication
2006 2026

138 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Laura A.V. Marlow: publications per year, 2006 to 2026
Year Publications
2006 1
2007 4
2008 2
2009 11
2010 6
2011 4
2012 7
2013 5
2014 9
2015 6
2016 9
2017 12
2018 10
2019 10
2020 6
2021 14
2022 8
2023 6
2024 4
2025 3
2026 1
Total 138
Download as CSV

Laura A.V. Marlow publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laura A.V. Marlow sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 108 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 108
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Laura A.V. Marlow D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laura A.V. Marlow sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 44
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Laura A.V. Marlow is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to medical research, particularly in the areas of oncology, epidemiology, and general health professions. Their research portfolio includes a strong focus on cancer screening and prevention, with a notable emphasis on cervical cancer and human papillomavirus (HPV) research.

The scientist's work spans several subfields of study including oncology, epidemiology, surgery, and health. Their research topics encompass:

  • Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Genital Health and Disease
  • Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
  • BRCA Gene Mutations in Cancer
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions

Frequent collaborators consist of researchers such as Jo Waller, Emily McBride, Martin Němec, Ninian Schmeising-Barnes, and Alice S. Forster.

Publication venues where this scientist has frequently published include:

  • Journal of Medical Screening
  • British Journal of Health Psychology
  • BMJ Open
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Vaccine

Among their recent papers are:

  • "Emotional response to testing positive for human papillomavirus at cervical cancer screening: a mixed method systematic review with meta-analysis" (2020), published in Health Psychology Review
  • "Vaccine acceptability, uptake and completion amongst men who have sex with men: A systematic review, meta-analysis and theoretical framework" (2021), published in Vaccine
  • "Cervical screening attendance and cervical cancer risk among women who have sex with women" (2021), published in Journal of Medical Screening
  • "Self-sampling for cervical screening offered at the point of invitation: A cross-sectional study of preferences in England" (2022), published in Journal of Medical Screening
  • "Concerns about disclosing a high-risk cervical human papillomavirus (HPV) infection to a sexual partner: a systematic review and thematic synthesis" (2020), published in BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health

Laura A.V. Marlow's research primarily addresses the intersection of cancer screening practices and behavioral health, examining patient attitudes and communication factors that affect screening uptake and outcomes. This work contributes to understanding how screening programs can be optimized, particularly in relation to cervical cancer and HPV.

Best Publications

  • Barriers to cervical cancer screening attendance in England: a population-based survey

    Jo Waller;Marta Bartoszek;Laura Marlow;Jane Wardle

  • Parental attitudes to pre-pubertal HPV vaccination

    Laura A.V. Marlow;Jo Waller;Jane Wardle

  • Validation of a measure of knowledge about human papillomavirus (HPV) using item response theory and classical test theory

    Jo Waller;Remo Ostini;Laura A.V. Marlow;Kirsten McCaffery

  • Barriers to cervical cancer screening among ethnic minority women: a qualitative study

    Laura A V Marlow;Jo Waller;Jane Wardle

  • Knowledge of human papillomavirus (HPV) and HPV vaccination: an international comparison.

    Laura A.V. Marlow;Gregory D. Zimet;Kirsten J. McCaffery;Remo Ostini

  • The association between knowledge of HPV and feelings of stigma, shame and anxiety.

    Jo Waller;Laura Av Marlow;Jane Wardle

  • Mothers' Attitudes towards Preventing Cervical Cancer through Human Papillomavirus Vaccination: A Qualitative Study

    Jo Waller;Laura A V Marlow;Jane Wardle

  • Public awareness that HPV is a risk factor for cervical cancer

    L A V Marlow;J Waller;J Wardle

  • Attitudes towards lung cancer screening in socioeconomically deprived and heavy smoking communities: informing screening communication

    Samantha L. Quaife;Laura A. V. Marlow;Andy McEwen;Samuel M. Janes

  • Experiences of cervical screening and barriers to participation in the context of an organised programme: a systematic review and thematic synthesis

    Amanda J. Chorley;Laura A. V. Marlow;Alice S. Forster;Jessica B. Haddrell

  • Trust and experience as predictors of HPV vaccine acceptance.

    Laura A.V. Marlow;Jo Waller;Jane Wardle

  • Ethnic differences in human papillomavirus awareness and vaccine acceptability

    Laura A.V Marlow;Jane Wardle;Alice S Forster;Jo Waller

  • Exploring age differences in reasons for nonattendance for cervical screening: a qualitative study

    J Waller;M Jackowska;L Marlow;J Wardle

  • Predictors of interest in HPV vaccination: A study of British adolescents.

    Laura A.V. Marlow;Jo Waller;Ruth E.C. Evans;Jane Wardle

  • Mothers' and adolescents' beliefs about risk compensation following HPV vaccination

    Laura A.V. Marlow;Alice S. Forster;Jane Wardle;Jo Waller

  • Understanding cervical screening non-attendance among ethnic minority women in England

    L A V Marlow;J Wardle;J Waller

  • Cancer stigma and cancer screening attendance: a population based survey in England

    Charlotte Vrinten;Ailish Gallagher;Jo Waller;Laura A. V. Marlow

  • Cancer fear and fatalism among ethnic minority women in the United Kingdom

    Charlotte Vrinten;Jane Wardle;Laura Av Marlow

  • Does lung cancer attract greater stigma than other cancer types

    Laura A.V. Marlow;Jo Waller;Jane Wardle

  • Attitudes toward HPV vaccination among parents of adolescent girls in Mysore, India.

    Purnima Madhivanan;Karl Krupp;M.N. Yashodha;Laura Marlow

  • Peer-to-Peer Communication, Cancer Prevention, and the Internet

    Jessica S Ancker;Kristen M Carpenter;Paul Greene;Randi Hoffman

Frequent Co-Authors

Jo Waller
Jo Waller King's College London
Jane Wardle
Jane Wardle University College London
Gregory D. Zimet
Gregory D. Zimet Indiana University
Kirsten McCaffery
Kirsten McCaffery University of Sydney
Henry C Kitchener
Henry C Kitchener University of Manchester
Rebecca A. Ferrer
Rebecca A. Ferrer National Institutes of Health
Rona Moss-Morris
Rona Moss-Morris King's College London
Peter Sasieni
Peter Sasieni King's College London
Arthur L. Reingold
Arthur L. Reingold University of California, Berkeley
Holly G. Prigerson
Holly G. Prigerson Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to a range of online degrees and rewarding career pathways. Many students begin with a bachelor’s or master’s degree in psychology, and then go on to pursue specialized roles within counseling, therapy, or mental health services. Online degrees offer flexibility, making it easier to balance studies with personal or professional commitments.

Becoming a licensed therapist is a common ambition for psychology graduates. Each state sets distinct requirements and educational paths. For instance, those interested in working in Washington can consult the Spokane licensed therapist education requirements. If you’re looking toward the Midwest, the licensed therapist requirements in St. Louis provide important details for Missouri students.

For those planning to practice in Florida, the St. Petersburg licensed therapist education requirements explain the necessary educational steps and credentials. Future counselors considering California should review the guidelines on how to become a licensed therapist in Stockton for a clearer understanding of local licensure demands.

Whether you’re drawn to clinical practice, research, or community outreach, understanding regional licensure rules is essential to mapping your educational journey and future psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Laura A.V. Marlow

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles