World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 43 6259 6040 205 196 311 6452

Tobias Knopp publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tobias Knopp between 2002 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tobias Knopp published across 25 years, from 2002 to 2026, averaging 15 papers a year. Output peaked at 37 publications in 2020. 29 of the 376 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 37. Peak 37 publications in 2020. 2002: 2 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 27 publications 2011: 23 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 21 publications 2017: 24 publications 2018: 25 publications 2019: 28 publications 2020: 37 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 21 publications 2025: 27 publications 2026: 2 publications
2002 2026

376 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tobias Knopp: publications per year, 2002 to 2026
Year Publications
2002 2
2003 0
2004 0
2005 5
2006 5
2007 4
2008 6
2009 14
2010 27
2011 23
2012 20
2013 12
2014 5
2015 17
2016 21
2017 24
2018 25
2019 28
2020 37
2021 22
2022 13
2023 16
2024 21
2025 27
2026 2
Total 376
Download as CSV

Tobias Knopp publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tobias Knopp sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 308–317 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 311 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154 311
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Tobias Knopp D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tobias Knopp sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380 43
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Tobias Knopp is affiliated with Universität Hamburg in Germany and has contributed extensively to the field of engineering, with a particular focus on biomedical engineering. Their research spans a variety of subfields and specialized topics, reflecting a broad engagement with interdisciplinary scientific challenges.

The main fields of study in their work include:

  • Engineering

Within this broad area, their subfields of study cover:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Molecular Biology
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Computational Mechanics

The primary topics examined in their publications focus on:

  • Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles
  • Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
  • Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography
  • Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
  • Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
  • Magnetic Properties and Applications
  • Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows

Knopp has authored papers in several prominent publication venues, indicating a consistent presence in significant academic forums. Their frequent publication venues include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Physics in Medicine and Biology
  • IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
  • IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging

Their recent papers demonstrate a focus on magnetic particle imaging and its applications, as well as artificial intelligence in medical imaging workflows. Selected papers include:

  • Monitoring Intracranial Cerebral Hemorrhage Using Multicontrast Real-Time Magnetic Particle Imaging, 2020, ACS Nano
  • Smart chest X-ray worklist prioritization using artificial intelligence: a clinical workflow simulation, 2020, Informationszentrum Lebenswissenschaften (ZB MED)
  • Visualization of spatial and temporal temperature distributions with magnetic particle imaging for liver tumor ablation therapy, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Magnetic particle imaging for assessment of cerebral perfusion and ischemia, 2021, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology
  • Development of Long Circulating Magnetic Particle Imaging Tracers: Use of Novel Magnetic Nanoparticles and Entrapment Into Human Erythrocytes, 2020, Nanomedicine

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Martin Möddel
  • Marija Boberg
  • Florian Thieben
  • Patryk Szwargulski
  • Matthias Graeser

Best Publications

  • Magnetization response spectroscopy of superparamagnetic nanoparticles for magnetic particle imaging

    S Biederer;T Knopp;T F Sattel;K Lüdtke-Buzug

  • Human-sized magnetic particle imaging for brain applications

    M. Graeser;M. Graeser;F. Thieben;F. Thieben;P. Szwargulski;P. Szwargulski;F. Werner;F. Werner

  • Magnetic Particle Imaging: An Introduction to Imaging Principles and Scanner Instrumentation

    Tobias Knopp;Thorsten M. Buzug

  • Magnetic particle imaging: from proof of principle to preclinical applications

    Tobias Knopp;Nadine Gdaniec;Nadine Gdaniec;Martin Möddel;Martin Möddel

  • Magnetic Particle Imaging for Real-Time Perfusion Imaging in Acute Stroke

    Peter Ludewig;Nadine Gdaniec;Jan Sedlacik;Nils D. Forkert

  • Weighted iterative reconstruction for magnetic particle imaging

    T Knopp;J Rahmer;T F Sattel;S Biederer

  • Trajectory analysis for magnetic particle imaging

    T Knopp;S Biederer;T Sattel;J Weizenecker

  • Single-sided device for magnetic particle imaging

    Timo F Sattel;Tobias Knopp;Sven Biederer;Bernhard Gleich

  • Model-Based Reconstruction for Magnetic Particle Imaging

    T. Knopp;T.F. Sattel;S. Biederer;J. Rahmer

  • Towards Picogram Detection of Superparamagnetic Iron-Oxide Particles Using a Gradiometric Receive Coil.

    Matthias Graeser;Tobias Knopp;Tobias Knopp;Patryk Szwargulski;Patryk Szwargulski;Thomas Friedrich

  • A grid and flow adaptive wall-function method for RANS turbulence modelling

    Unknown

  • 2D model-based reconstruction for magnetic particle imaging.

    Tobias Knopp;Sven Biederer;Timo F. Sattel;Jürgen Rahmer

  • Prediction of the Spatial Resolution of Magnetic Particle Imaging Using the Modulation Transfer Function of the Imaging Process

    T Knopp;S Biederer;T F Sattel;M Erbe

  • On the formulation of the image reconstruction problem in magnetic particle imaging.

    Mandy Grüttner;Tobias Knopp;Jochen Franke;Michael Heidenreich

  • Magnetic Particle / Magnetic Resonance Imaging: In-Vitro MPI-Guided Real Time Catheter Tracking and 4D Angioplasty Using a Road Map and Blood Pool Tracer Approach.

    Johannes Salamon;Martin Hofmann;Martin Hofmann;Caroline Jung;Michael Gerhard Kaul

  • Monitoring Intracranial Cerebral Hemorrhage Using Multicontrast Real-Time Magnetic Particle Imaging

    Patryk Szwargulski;Maximilian Wilmes;Ehsan Javidi;Florian Thieben

  • Human-sized Magnetic Particle Imaging for Brain Applications

    M. Gräser;F. Thieben;P. Szwargulski;F. Werner

  • Edge Preserving and Noise Reducing Reconstruction for Magnetic Particle Imaging

    Martin Storath;Christina Brandt;Martin Hofmann;Tobias Knopp

  • Sensitivity Enhancement in Magnetic Particle Imaging by Background Subtraction

    Kolja Them;M. G. Kaul;C. Jung;M. Hofmann

  • Stabilized finite element methods with shock capturing for advection–diffusion problems

    Unknown

  • Analog receive signal processing for magnetic particle imaging

    Matthias Graeser;Tobias Knopp;Mandy Grüttner;Timo F. Sattel

  • A note on the iterative MRI reconstruction from nonuniform k-space data.

    Tobias Knopp;Stefan Kunis;Daniel Potts

  • Towards Picogram Detection of Superparamagnetic Iron-Oxide Particles Using a Gradiometric Receive Coil

    Matthias Gräser;Tobias Knopp;Patryk Szwargulski;Thomas Friedrich

Frequent Co-Authors

Thorsten M. Buzug
Thorsten M. Buzug University of Lübeck
Gerhard Adam
Gerhard Adam BOKU University
Kannan M. Krishnan
Kannan M. Krishnan University of Washington
Klaus Diedrich
Klaus Diedrich University of Lübeck
Daniel Potts
Daniel Potts Chemnitz University of Technology
Christian Gerloff
Christian Gerloff University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
Mauro Magnani
Mauro Magnani University of Urbino
Horst Weller
Horst Weller Universität Hamburg
Michael Amling
Michael Amling Universität Hamburg
Götz Thomalla
Götz Thomalla Universität Hamburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Tobias Knopp

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles