World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
42
Citations
17366
World Ranking
7241
National Ranking
2574

Michael A. Lefsky publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael A. Lefsky sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 89 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Michael A. Lefsky D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael A. Lefsky sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael A. Lefsky is affiliated with Colorado State University in the United States. Their research focuses on environmental science, particularly in the areas of environmental engineering, global and planetary change, nature and landscape conservation, water science and technology, and geochemistry and petrology.

The scientist has contributed to topics including remote sensing and LiDAR applications, forest ecology and management, hydrology and watershed management studies, groundwater and isotope geochemistry, groundwater flow and contamination studies, land use and ecosystem services, and soil and land suitability analysis.

Michael A. Lefsky has published several notable papers, including:

  • "The Case for an Open Water Balance: Re-envisioning Network Design and Data Analysis for a Complex, Uncertain World" (2020) in Water Resources Research
  • "Dividing the Topographical Advantage of Forestland by Spatial Analysis and the Analytic Hierarchy Process" (2020) in Journal of Sustainable Forestry
  • "Virgin Islands land cover and forest structure" (2021) in Forest Service Research Data Archive
  • "Maps of Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands forest functional groups, biomass, height, and species counts (2001-2008) and satellite image composites (1980-2000)" (2023) in Forest Service Research Data Archive

Their frequent coauthors include Eileen H. Helmer, Stephanie K. Kampf, Stephen J. Burges, John C. Hammond, and Aditi S. Bhaskar.

Michael A. Lefsky's work is often published in venues such as the Forest Service Research Data Archive, Water Resources Research, and the Journal of Sustainable Forestry.

Best Publications

  • Benchmark map of forest carbon stocks in tropical regions across three continents.

    Sassan S Saatchi;Nancy L Harris;Sandra Brown;Michael A Lefsky

  • Lidar Remote Sensing for Ecosystem Studies

    Michael A. Lefsky;Warren B. Cohen;Geoffrey G. Parker;David J. Harding

  • Lidar Remote Sensing of the Canopy Structure and Biophysical Properties of Douglas-Fir Western Hemlock Forests

    M.A. Lefsky;W.B. Cohen;S.A. Acker;G.G. Parker

  • Review of studies on tree species classification from remotely sensed data

    Fabian Ewald Fassnacht;Hooman Latifi;Krzysztof Stereńczak;Aneta Modzelewska

  • Surface lidar remote sensing of basal area and biomass in deciduous forests of eastern Maryland, USA

    M. A. Lefsky;D. Harding;W. B. Cohen;Geoffrey G. Parker

  • Estimates of forest canopy height and aboveground biomass using ICESat

    Michael A. Lefsky;David J. Harding;Michael Keller;Michael Keller;Warren B. Cohen

  • A flexible spatiotemporal method for fusing satellite images with different resolutions

    Xiaolin Zhu;Eileen H. Helmer;Feng Gao;Desheng Liu

  • Lidar remote sensing of above‐ground biomass in three biomes

    Michael A. Lefsky;Warren B. Cohen;David J. Harding;Geoffrey G. Parker

  • A global forest canopy height map from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer and the Geoscience Laser Altimeter System

    Michael A. Lefsky

  • The ICESat-2 Laser Altimetry Mission

    Waleed Abdalati;H Jay Zwally;Robert Bindschadler;Bea Csatho

  • Laser altimeter canopy height profiles: methods and validation for closed-canopy, broadleaf forests

    D.J Harding;M.A Lefsky;G.G Parker;J.B Blair

  • Integration of lidar and Landsat ETM+ data for estimating and mapping forest canopy height

    Andrew T Hudak;Michael A Lefsky;Warren B Cohen;Mercedes Berterretche

  • Revised method for forest canopy height estimation from Geoscience Laser Altimeter System waveforms

    Michael A. Lefsky;Michael Keller;Yong Pang;Plinio B. de Camargo

  • An evaluation of alternate remote sensing products for forest inventory, monitoring, and mapping of Douglas-fir forests in western Oregon

    M A Lefsky;W B Cohen;T A Spies

  • Forest carbon densities and uncertainties from Lidar, QuickBird, and field measurements in California

    Patrick Gonzalez;Gregory P. Asner;John J. Battles;Michael A. Lefsky

  • Urban forest biomass estimates: is it important to use allometric relationships developed specifically for urban trees?

    M. R. McHale;M. R. McHale;I. C. Burke;M. A. Lefsky;P. J. Peper

  • Mapping tropical forest biomass with radar and spaceborne LiDAR in Lopé National Park, Gabon: Overcoming problems of high biomass and persistent cloud

    Edward T A Mitchard;Sassan S Saatchi;Lee White;Katharine Abernethy

  • Amazon forest carbon dynamics predicted by profiles of canopy leaf area and light environment

    Scott C Stark;Veronika Leitold;Jin L Wu;Maria O Hunter

  • Characterizing 3D vegetation structure from space: Mission requirements

    Forrest G. Hall;Kathleen Bergen;James B. Blair;Ralph Dubayah

  • Three-dimensional Structure of an Old-growth Pseudotsuga-Tsuga Canopy and Its Implications for Radiation Balance, Microclimate, and Gas Exchange

    Geoffrey G. Parker;Mark E. Harmon;Michael A. Lefsky;Jiquan Chen

  • Lidar Remote Sensing of Aboveground Biomass in Three Biomes

    M. A. Lefsky;W. B. Cohen;D. J. Harding;Geoffrey G. Parker

Frequent Co-Authors

Warren B. Cohen
Warren B. Cohen Oregon State University
Sassan Saatchi
Sassan Saatchi California Institute of Technology
David J. Harding
David J. Harding Goddard Space Flight Center
Geoffrey G. Parker
Geoffrey G. Parker Smithsonian Environmental Research Center
Michael Keller
Michael Keller US Forest Service
Ranga B. Myneni
Ranga B. Myneni Boston University
Stephanie K. Kampf
Stephanie K. Kampf Colorado State University
Plínio Barbosa de Camargo
Plínio Barbosa de Camargo Universidade de São Paulo
Eileen H. Helmer
Eileen H. Helmer US Forest Service
Michael G. Ryan
Michael G. Ryan Colorado State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in pursuing Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities. Many students look for affordable education options, and an online general studies bachelor degree cheap can be an excellent starting point. This type of degree offers broad foundational knowledge, making it easier to transition into specialized environmental fields later.

If you’re seeking a more straightforward academic path, some programs are classified as the easy bachelor's degree options without compromising quality. These degrees can help build relevant skills with a manageable workload, ideal for students balancing education with other commitments.

Specialized degrees such as an online geoscience degree provide in-depth knowledge crucial for understanding earth processes, natural resources, and environmental stewardship. Graduates often find careers in research, environmental consulting, or resource management.

Another promising pathway is Geographic Information Systems (GIS). A solid gis degree programs curriculum equips students with skills in mapping and spatial analysis, highly valuable in environmental planning, conservation, and disaster management roles.

Best Scientists Citing Michael A. Lefsky

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles