World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 36 9212 8832 3302 3063 123 3612

Stephanie K. Kampf publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Stephanie K. Kampf between 2002 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Stephanie K. Kampf published across 25 years, from 2002 to 2026, averaging 5.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2020. 9 of the 142 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2020. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 3 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 8 publications 2026: 1 publication
2002 2026

142 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Stephanie K. Kampf: publications per year, 2002 to 2026
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 3
2004 1
2005 3
2006 3
2007 4
2008 2
2009 2
2010 3
2011 4
2012 6
2013 5
2014 8
2015 5
2016 11
2017 9
2018 10
2019 6
2020 12
2021 12
2022 5
2023 8
2024 10
2025 8
2026 1
Total 142
Download as CSV

Stephanie K. Kampf publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephanie K. Kampf sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 123 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617 123
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Stephanie K. Kampf D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephanie K. Kampf sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206 36
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Stephanie K. Kampf is affiliated with Colorado State University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with extensive work in related subfields such as global and planetary change, water science and technology, atmospheric science, ecology, and management, monitoring, policy, and law.

The scientist's work addresses various main topics, including:

  • Hydrology and watershed management studies
  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Hydrology and sediment transport processes
  • Landslides and related hazards
  • Flood risk assessment and management
  • Soil erosion and sediment transport

Stephanie K. Kampf has published frequently in several venues, demonstrating a diverse range of interests within environmental science. The most common publication outlets include:

  • Water
  • Water Resources Research
  • Hydrological Processes
  • Forest Ecology and Management
  • Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Water

Key recent papers by Kampf highlight topics across hydrology and stream ecology. Notable works include:

  • "Pervasive changes in stream intermittency across the United States", 2021, Environmental Research Letters
  • "Zero or not? Causes and consequences of zero-flow stream gage readings", 2020, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Water
  • "Spatial Patterns and Drivers of Nonperennial Flow Regimes in the Contiguous United States", 2021, Geophysical Research Letters
  • "What's in a Name? Patterns, Trends, and Suggestions for Defining Non-Perennial Rivers and Streams", 2020, Water
  • "River ecosystem conceptual models and non-perennial rivers: A critical review", 2020, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Water

Frequent collaborators have been an important aspect of Kampf's scientific contributions. Key coauthors include:

  • John C. Hammond
  • Margaret Zimmer
  • Thibault Datry
  • Sarah E. Godsey
  • Daniel C. Allen

Best Publications

  • A framework for classifying and comparing distributed hillslope and catchment hydrologic models

    Stephanie K. Kampf;Stephen J. Burges

  • Accuracy and uncertainty of thermal-infrared remote sensing of stream temperatures at multiple spatial scales

    R.N. Handcock;A.R. Gillespie;K.A. Cherkauer;J.E. Kay

  • Pervasive changes in stream intermittency across the United States

    Samuel C Zipper;John C Hammond;Margaret Shanafield;Margaret Zimmer

  • Evaporation and land surface energy budget at the Salar de Atacama, Northern Chile

    Stephanie K. Kampf;Scott W. Tyler;Cristián A. Ortiz;José F. Muñoz

  • Zero or not? Causes and consequences of zero-flow stream gage readings.

    Margaret A. Zimmer;Kendra E. Kaiser;Joanna R. Blaszczak;Samuel C. Zipper

  • Spatial Patterns and Drivers of Nonperennial Flow Regimes in the Contiguous United States

    John C. Hammond;Margaret Zimmer;Margaret Shanafield;Kendra Kaiser

  • Changes in Andes snow cover from MODIS data, 2000–2016

    Freddy A. Saavedra;Stephanie K. Kampf;Steven R. Fassnacht;Jason S. Sibold

  • Global snow zone maps and trends in snow persistence 2001–2016

    John C. Hammond;Freddy A. Saavedra;Stephanie K. Kampf

  • Transition of dominant peak flow source from snowmelt to rainfall along the Colorado Front Range: Historical patterns, trends, and lessons from the 2013 Colorado Front Range floods

    Stephanie K. Kampf;Michael A. Lefsky

  • Accuracy of lake and stream temperatures estimated from thermal infrared images

    Jennifer E. Kay;Stephanie K. Kampf;Rebecca N. Handcock;Keith A. Cherkauer

  • River ecosystem conceptual models and non‐perennial rivers: A critical review

    Daniel C. Allen;Thibault Datry;Kate S. Boersma;Michael T. Bogan

  • What's in a Name? Patterns, Trends, and Suggestions for Defining Non-Perennial Rivers and Streams.

    Michelle H Busch;Katie H Costigan;Ken M Fritz;Thibault Datry

  • Assessing Satellite-Based and Aircraft-Based Thermal Infrared Remote Sensing for Monitoring Pacific Northwest River Temperature

    Keith A. Cherkauer;Stephen J. Burges;Rebecca N. Handcock;Jennifer E. Kay

  • Revised Coefficients for Priestley-Taylor and Makkink-Hansen Equations for Estimating Daily Reference Evapotranspiration

    Nicoleta C. Cristea;Stephanie K. Kampf;Stephen J. Burges

  • Subannual Streamflow Responses to Rainfall and Snowmelt Inputs in Snow‐Dominated Watersheds of the Western United States

    John C. Hammond;Stephanie K. Kampf

  • Redistribution of pyrogenic carbon from hillslopes to stream corridors following a large montane wildfire

    M. Francesca Cotrufo;Claudia M. Boot;Stephanie Kampf;Peter A. Nelson

  • How do geomorphic effects of rainfall vary with storm type and spatial scale in a post-fire landscape?

    Stephanie K. Kampf;Daniel J. Brogan;Sarah Schmeer;Lee H. MacDonald

  • How Does Snow Persistence Relate to Annual Streamflow in Mountain Watersheds of the Western U.S. With Wet Maritime and Dry Continental Climates

    John C. Hammond;Freddy A. Saavedra;Stephanie K. Kampf

  • Return on investment from fuel treatments to reduce severe wildfire and erosion in a watershed investment program in Colorado.

    Kelly W. Jones;Jeffery B. Cannon;Freddy A. Saavedra;Stephanie K. Kampf

  • Partitioning snowmelt and rainfall in the critical zone: effects of climate type and soil properties

    John C. Hammond;John C. Hammond;Adrian A. Harpold;Sydney Weiss;Stephanie K. Kampf

  • Spatiotemporal index for analyzing controls on snow climatology: application in the Colorado Front Range

    Eric E. Richer;Stephanie K. Kampf;Steven R. Fassnacht;Cara C. Moore

  • Testing the Waters: Mobile Apps for Crowdsourced Streamflow Data

    Stephanie Kampf;Barbara Strobl;John Hammond;Alyssa Anenberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Lee H. MacDonald
Lee H. MacDonald Colorado State University
Benjamin B. Mirus
Benjamin B. Mirus United States Geological Survey
Julian D. Olden
Julian D. Olden University of Washington
Thibault Datry
Thibault Datry Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Keith Loague
Keith Loague Stanford University
Walter K. Dodds
Walter K. Dodds Kansas State University
Alan R. Gillespie
Alan R. Gillespie University of Washington
Jennifer E. Kay
Jennifer E. Kay University of Colorado Boulder
Michael A. Lefsky
Michael A. Lefsky Colorado State University
Adam S. Ward
Adam S. Ward Oregon State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can expand career opportunities and skills. One key area is Geographic Information Systems (GIS), which plays a crucial role in mapping and analyzing environmental data. Many institutions offer best gis programs that help students specialize in spatial analysis essential for environmental planning and management.

Another important field intersects with public administration. Environmental policies often require governance and implementation knowledge, making a Master of Public Administration valuable. Those seeking flexibility can find excellent options listed in the best online mpa programs, many of which allow completion within a year.

Sociology also complements environmental studies by examining human behaviors and societal impacts on the environment. Pursuing a bachelor’s in sociology online offers insight into social dynamics and community engagement, which are critical in environmental advocacy. Explore programs through the sociology bachelor degree online resource for more information.

Finally, for those interested in education and leadership roles within environmental fields, advanced degrees like an EdD can be appealing. Programs that do not require a dissertation may better suit professionals seeking practical knowledge without lengthy research commitments. Learn about these options via the edd without dissertation guide.

Best Scientists Citing Stephanie K. Kampf

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles