World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
61
Citations
11860
World Ranking
1812
National Ranking
796

Michael N. Gooseff publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael N. Gooseff sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 603+

This scientist: 312 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

Michael N. Gooseff D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael N. Gooseff sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of the Geological Society of America
  • Fellow of the Geological Society of America
  • Fellow of the Geological Society of America
  • Fellow of the Geological Society of America

Overview

Michael N. Gooseff is affiliated with the University of Colorado Boulder in the United States. Their research primarily engages with Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, focusing on subfields such as Atmospheric Science, Ecology, Environmental Chemistry, Water Science and Technology, and Nature and Landscape Conservation.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics including Polar Research and Ecology, Cryospheric Studies and Observations, Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics, Climate Change and Permafrost, Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies, Fish Ecology and Management Studies, and Arctic and Antarctic Ice Dynamics.

Michael N. Gooseff has contributed to several research papers recently, including:

  • Seasonal Subsurface Thaw Dynamics of an Aufeis Feature Inferred From Geophysical Methods, 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Earth Surface
  • Increasing Alaskan river discharge during the cold season is driven by recent warming, 2023, Environmental Research Letters
  • The seasonal evolution of albedo across glaciers and the surrounding landscape of Taylor Valley, Antarctica, 2020, The Cryosphere
  • Aufeis fields as novel groundwater-dependent ecosystems in the arctic cryosphere, 2020, Limnology and Oceanography
  • Cross-Site Comparisons of Dryland Ecosystem Response to Climate Change in the US Long-Term Ecological Research Network, 2021, BioScience

Frequent co-authors of Michael N. Gooseff include Joel Singley, Diane M. McKnight, T. P. Covino, Peter T. Doran, and Anna Bergstrom.

The scientist has published work in a variety of venues such as Hydrological Processes, Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences, Water Resources Research, Journal of Geophysical Research Earth Surface, and Journal of Hydrology.

Among recognitions, Michael N. Gooseff has been named a Fellow of the Geological Society of America.

Best Publications

  • Hydrologic connectivity between landscapes and streams: Transferring reach- and plot-scale understanding to the catchment scale

    Kelsey G. Jencso;Brian L. McGlynn;Michael N. Gooseff;Steven M. Wondzell

  • The polar regions in a 2°C warmer world

    Eric Post;Richard B. Alley;Torben R. Christensen;Marc Macias-Fauria

  • River corridor science: Hydrologic exchange and ecological consequences from bedforms to basins

    Judson Harvey;Michael Gooseff

  • Changes in the character of stream water dissolved organic carbon during flushing in three small watersheds, Oregon

    Eran Hood;Michael N. Gooseff;Sherri L. Johnson

  • Moving beyond the banks: hyporheic restoration is fundamental to restoring ecological services and functions of streams.

    Erich T. Hester;Michael N. Gooseff

  • Sediment and nutrient delivery from thermokarst features in the foothills of the North Slope, Alaska: Potential impacts on headwater stream ecosystems

    William B. Bowden;Michael N. Gooseff;Michael N. Gooseff;A. Balser;A. Green;A. Green

  • Channel water balance and exchange with subsurface flow along a mountain headwater stream in Montana, United States

    R. A. Payn;R. A. Payn;M. N. Gooseff;B. L. McGlynn;K. E. Bencala

  • Hillslope hydrologic connectivity controls riparian groundwater turnover: Implications of catchment structure for riparian buffering and stream water sources

    Kelsey G. Jencso;Brian L. McGlynn;Michael N. Gooseff;Kenneth E. Bencala

  • A modelling study of hyporheic exchange pattern and the sequence, size, and spacing of stream bedforms in mountain stream networks, Oregon, USA

    Michael N. Gooseff;Justin K. Anderson;Steven M. Wondzell;Justin LaNier

  • Investigating controls on the thermal sensitivity of Pennsylvania streams

    C. Kelleher;T. Wagener;M. Gooseff;B. McGlynn

  • Soil Microbial Responses to Increased Moisture and Organic Resources along a Salinity Gradient in a Polar Desert

    David J. Van Horn;Jordan G. Okie;Jordan G. Okie;Heather N. Buelow;Michael N. Gooseff

  • Comparing transient storage modeling and residence time distribution (RTD) analysis in geomorphically varied reaches in the Lookout Creek basin, Oregon, USA

    Michael N. Gooseff;Steve M. Wondzell;Roy Haggerty;Justin Anderson

  • Weathering reactions and hyporheic exchange controls on stream water chemistry in a glacial meltwater stream in the McMurdo Dry Valleys

    Michael N. Gooseff;Michael N. Gooseff;Diane M. McKnight;W. Berry Lyons;Alex E. Blum

  • Relating transient storage to channel complexity in streams of varying land use in Jackson Hole, Wyoming

    Michael N. Gooseff;Robert O. Hall;Jennifer L. Tank

  • A method for estimating surface transient storage parameters for streams with concurrent hyporheic storage

    Martin A. Briggs;Michael N. Gooseff;Christopher D. Arp;Michelle A. Baker

  • Rethinking hyporheic flow and transient storage to advance understanding of stream‐catchment connections

    Kenneth E. Bencala;Michael N. Gooseff;Briant A. Kimball

  • Defining Hyporheic Zones – Advancing Our Conceptual and Operational Definitions of Where Stream Water and Groundwater Meet

    Michael N. Gooseff

  • Patterns in stream longitudinal profiles and implications for hyporheic exchange flow at the H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest, Oregon, USA

    Justin K. Anderson;Justin K. Anderson;Steven M. Wondzell;Michael N. Gooseff;Roy Haggerty

  • Management of Large Wood in Streams: An Overview and Proposed Framework for Hazard Evaluation†

    Ellen Wohl;Brian P. Bledsoe;Kurt D. Fausch;Natalie Kramer

  • Denitrification and hydrologic transient storage in a glacial meltwater stream, McMurdo Dry Valleys, Antarctica

    Michael N. Gooseff;Diane M. McKnight;Robert L. Runkel;John H. Duff

  • Determining in‐channel (dead zone) transient storage by comparing solute transport in a bedrock channel–alluvial channel sequence, Oregon

    Michael N. Gooseff;Justin LaNier;Roy Haggerty;Kenneth Kokkeler;Kenneth Kokkeler

  • Hydrologic and geomorphic controls on hyporheic exchange during base flow recession in a headwater mountain stream

    Adam S. Ward;Adam S. Ward;Michael Fitzgerald;Michael N. Gooseff;Thomas J. Voltz

Frequent Co-Authors

Diane M. McKnight
Diane M. McKnight University of Colorado Boulder
Brian L. McGlynn
Brian L. McGlynn Duke University
John E. Barrett
John E. Barrett Virginia Tech
William B. Bowden
William B. Bowden University of Vermont
Kamini Singha
Kamini Singha Colorado School of Mines
Adam S. Ward
Adam S. Ward Oregon State University
Steven M. Wondzell
Steven M. Wondzell US Forest Service
Wilfred M. Wollheim
Wilfred M. Wollheim University of New Hampshire
James P. McNamara
James P. McNamara Boise State University
Kenneth E. Bencala
Kenneth E. Bencala United States Geological Survey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Earth Science in the USA opens doors to a variety of related fields that can enhance your expertise and career options. Many students opt to complement their studies with programs like the best online masters degree in human resource management programs, blending scientific knowledge with management skills for roles in environmental consulting and project coordination.

For adult learners and seniors looking to advance or reshape their careers, there are numerous online degree programs for seniors that offer flexibility and support, making Earth Science and its allied disciplines more accessible to all age groups.

Another unique yet relevant field is library science, which plays a crucial role in managing scientific information and data. Exploring the ALA accredited library science programs online can prepare students for careers in organizing and preserving scientific research.

Understanding what is library science also highlights how vital information management is in Earth Science careers, especially in research institutions and government agencies.

Best Scientists Citing Michael N. Gooseff

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles