World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Steven M. Wondzell

Steven M. Wondzell

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
41
Citations
10081
World Ranking
7583
National Ranking
2698

Steven M. Wondzell publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven M. Wondzell sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 114 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Steven M. Wondzell D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven M. Wondzell sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Steven M. Wondzell is affiliated with the US Forest Service in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Environmental Science, with particular contributions to Water Science and Technology, Ecology, Environmental Chemistry, Nature and Landscape Conservation, and Soil Science.

The scientist's work addresses several main topics, including:

  • Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
  • Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Tree-ring climate responses

Key recent publications by Steven M. Wondzell include:

  • Climate Change Causes River Network Contraction and Disconnection in the H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest, Oregon, USA (2020), published in Frontiers in Water
  • The Influence of Local and Nonlocal Factors on Soil Water Content in a Steep Forested Catchment (2021), published in Water Resources Research
  • Rehabilitating Valley Floors to a Stage 0 Condition: A Synthesis of Opening Outcomes (2022), published in Frontiers in Environmental Science
  • Development of a geomorphic monitoring strategy for stage 0 restoration in the South Fork McKenzie River, Oregon, USA (2022), published in Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
  • Long-term hydrology and aquatic biogeochemistry data from H. J. Andrews Experimental Forest, Cascade Mountains, Oregon (2021), published in Hydrological Processes

Steven M. Wondzell's frequent co-authors include:

  • Adam S. Ward
  • Skuyler Herzog
  • Karla M. Jarecke
  • Kevin D. Bladon
  • Sherri L. Johnson

They have published extensively in several scientific venues, with multiple contributions to:

  • Water Resources Research
  • HydroShare Resources
  • Hydrological Processes
  • Frontiers in Water
  • Frontiers in Environmental Science

This profile reflects the scientist's focus on understanding watershed processes, soil water dynamics, and ecological interactions within forested environments. The research encompasses long-term hydrological data collection, geomorphic restoration strategies, and the effects of climate change on river network connectivity.

Best Publications

  • Hydrologic connectivity between landscapes and streams: Transferring reach- and plot-scale understanding to the catchment scale

    Kelsey G. Jencso;Brian L. McGlynn;Michael N. Gooseff;Steven M. Wondzell

  • Dynamics of nitrate production and removal as a function of residence time in the hyporheic zone

    Jay P. Zarnetske;Roy D. Haggerty;Steven M. Wondzell;Michelle A. Baker

  • Geomorphic controls on hyporheic exchange flow in mountain streams

    Tamao Kasahara;Tamao Kasahara;Steven M. Wondzell

  • Postfire erosional processes in the Pacific Northwest and Rocky Mountain regions

    Steven M. Wondzell;John G. King

  • FLOODS, CHANNEL CHANGE, AND THE HYPORHEIC ZONE

    Steven M. Wondzell;Frederick J. Swanson

  • Power-law residence time distribution in the hyporheic zone of a 2nd-order mountain stream

    Roy Haggerty;Steven M. Wondzell;Matthew A. Johnson

  • Physical Hydrology and the Effects of Forest Harvesting in the Pacific Northwest: a Review

    R.D. Moore;S.M. Wondzell

  • Compensatory dynamics are rare in natural ecological communities

    J. E. Houlahan;D. J. Currie;K. Cottenie;G. S. Cumming

  • Coupled transport and reaction kinetics control the nitrate source-sink function of hyporheic zones

    Jay P. Zarnetske;Roy Haggerty;Steven M. Wondzell;Vrushali A. Bokil

  • Seasonal and storm dynamics of the hyporheic zone of a 4th-order mountain stream. I: Hydrologic processes

    Steven M. Wondzell;Frederick J. Swanson

  • Effect of morphology and discharge on hyporheic exchange flows in two small streams in the Cascade Mountains of Oregon, USA

    Steven M. Wondzell

  • Channel water balance and exchange with subsurface flow along a mountain headwater stream in Montana, United States

    R. A. Payn;R. A. Payn;M. N. Gooseff;B. L. McGlynn;K. E. Bencala

  • Hillslope hydrologic connectivity controls riparian groundwater turnover: Implications of catchment structure for riparian buffering and stream water sources

    Kelsey G. Jencso;Brian L. McGlynn;Michael N. Gooseff;Kenneth E. Bencala

  • A modelling study of hyporheic exchange pattern and the sequence, size, and spacing of stream bedforms in mountain stream networks, Oregon, USA

    Michael N. Gooseff;Justin K. Anderson;Steven M. Wondzell;Justin LaNier

  • Disturbance regimes of stream and riparian systems — a disturbance‐cascade perspective

    Futoshi Nakamura;Frederick J. Swanson;Steven M. Wondzell

  • Comparing transient storage modeling and residence time distribution (RTD) analysis in geomorphically varied reaches in the Lookout Creek basin, Oregon, USA

    Michael N. Gooseff;Steve M. Wondzell;Roy Haggerty;Justin Anderson

  • Labile dissolved organic carbon supply limits hyporheic denitrification

    Jay P. Zarnetske;Jay P. Zarnetske;Roy D. Haggerty;Steven M. Wondzell;Michelle A. Baker

  • The role of the hyporheic zone across stream networks

    Steven M. Wondzell

  • Patterns in stream longitudinal profiles and implications for hyporheic exchange flow at the H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest, Oregon, USA

    Justin K. Anderson;Justin K. Anderson;Steven M. Wondzell;Michael N. Gooseff;Roy Haggerty

  • Seasonal and Storm Dynamics of the Hyporheic Zone of a 4th-Order Mountain Stream. II: Nitrogen Cycling

    Steven M. Wondzell;Frederick J. Swanson

  • Landscape Boundaries

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael N. Gooseff
Michael N. Gooseff University of Colorado Boulder
Adam S. Ward
Adam S. Ward Oregon State University
Roy Haggerty
Roy Haggerty Oregon State University
Brian L. McGlynn
Brian L. McGlynn Duke University
Kenneth E. Bencala
Kenneth E. Bencala United States Geological Survey
Ciaran J. Harman
Ciaran J. Harman Johns Hopkins University
Aaron I. Packman
Aaron I. Packman Northwestern University
David M. Hannah
David M. Hannah University of Birmingham
Stefan Krause
Stefan Krause University of Birmingham
Kamini Singha
Kamini Singha Colorado School of Mines

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Programs such as the best online geology degree offer foundational knowledge in earth processes, which is crucial for understanding environmental challenges like climate change and natural resource management.

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) skills are increasingly valuable in environmental analysis and planning. Enrolling in gis degree programs enables students to harness spatial data effectively, supporting roles in conservation, urban planning, and disaster response.

For those interested in leadership and policy aspects of environmental work, pursuing online mpa degrees can prepare graduates for public administration roles. These programs emphasize governance, sustainability policies, and community engagement, which are vital for driving environmental initiatives.

Additionally, understanding societal impacts of environmental issues is essential. Online degrees like the online bachelors degree programs in sociology provide insights into human behavior and social dynamics, equipping students to address environmental justice and community-based solutions.

Best Scientists Citing Steven M. Wondzell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles