World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
92
Citations
48346
World Ranking
11082
National Ranking
1049

Daniel F. McAuley publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel F. McAuley sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 468 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Daniel F. McAuley D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel F. McAuley sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel F. McAuley is affiliated with Queen's University Belfast in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with significant contributions in subfields such as Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Epidemiology, Emergency Medicine, and Infectious Diseases.

The scientist has published extensively in several key research areas, including Respiratory Support and Mechanisms, Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders, Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment, Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation, Neonatal Respiratory Health Research, COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies, and Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices.

Frequent collaboration has been noted with several co-authors, including Manu Shankar-Hari, Cecilia O'Kane, Alistair Nichol, Bronagh Blackwood, and Gavin D. Perkins. These partnerships have supported a range of research projects and publications.

Daniel F. McAuley's work has appeared regularly in notable publication venues. These include Critical Care, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), JAMA, and Intensive Care Medicine.

Recent published papers illustrate areas of focus relevant to acute medical conditions and treatment interventions:

  • COVID-19: consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression (2020, The Lancet)
  • Interleukin-6 Receptor Antagonists in Critically Ill Patients with Covid-19 (2021, New England Journal of Medicine)
  • A minimal common outcome measure set for COVID-19 clinical research (2020, The Lancet Infectious Diseases)
  • Effect of Hydrocortisone on Mortality and Organ Support in Patients With Severe COVID-19 (2020, JAMA)
  • Association Between Administration of IL-6 Antagonists and Mortality Among Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19 (2021, JAMA)

Best Publications

  • COVID-19: consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression

    Puja Mehta;Daniel F McAuley;Michael Brown;Emilie Sanchez

  • Epidemiology, Patterns of Care, and Mortality for Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Intensive Care Units in 50 Countries

    Giacomo Bellani;John G. Laffey;John G. Laffey;Tài Pham;Tài Pham;Eddy Fan;Eddy Fan

  • A minimal common outcome measure set for COVID-19 clinical research

    John C. Marshall;Srinivas Murthy;Janet Diaz;Neil Adhikari

  • An Official American Thoracic Society/European Society of Intensive Care Medicine/Society of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Practice Guideline: Mechanical Ventilation in Adult Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

    Eddy Fan;Lorenzo Del Sorbo;Ewan C. Goligher;Carol L. Hodgson

  • Genetic mechanisms of critical illness in Covid-19.

    E. Pairo-Castineira;E. Pairo-Castineira;S. Clohisey;L. Klaric;A. D. Bretherick

  • Referral to an Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Center and Mortality Among Patients With Severe 2009 Influenza A(H1N1)

    Moronke A. Noah;Giles J. Peek;Simon J. Finney;Mark J. Griffiths

  • Effect of Hydrocortisone on Mortality and Organ Support in Patients With Severe COVID-19: The REMAP-CAP COVID-19 Corticosteroid Domain Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Derek C. Angus;Lennie Derde;Farah Al-Beidh

  • Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Modulate Macrophages in Clinically Relevant Lung Injury Models by Extracellular Vesicle Mitochondrial Transfer

    Thomas J Morrison;Megan V Jackson;Erin K Cunningham;Adrien Kissenpfennig

  • Acute respiratory distress syndrome subphenotypes and differential response to simvastatin: secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial

    Carolyn S Calfee;Kevin L Delucchi;Pratik Sinha;Michael A Matthay

  • Timing of Initiation of Renal-Replacement Therapy in Acute Kidney Injury.

    Starrt-Aki Investigators

  • The inflammatory response to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO): a review of the pathophysiology.

    Jonathan E. Millar;Jonathon P. Fanning;Charles I. McDonald;Daniel F. McAuley

  • Physical, cognitive, and mental health impacts of COVID-19 after hospitalisation (PHOSP-COVID): a UK multicentre, prospective cohort study.

    Rachael A Evans;Hamish McAuley;Ewen M Harrison;Aarti Shikotra

  • Noninvasive Ventilation of Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Insights from the LUNG SAFE Study

    Giacomo Bellani;John G Laffey;Tài Pham;Fabiana Madotto

  • The statistical significance of randomized controlled trial results is frequently fragile: A case for a Fragility Index

    Michael Walsh;Michael Walsh;Sadeesh K. Srinathan;Daniel F. McAuley;Marko Mrkobrada

  • The beta-agonist lung injury trial (BALTI): a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial.

    Gavin D. Perkins;Daniel F. McAuley;David R. Thickett;Fang Gao

  • Mitochondrial Transfer via Tunneling Nanotubes is an Important Mechanism by Which Mesenchymal Stem Cells Enhance Macrophage Phagocytosis in the In Vitro and In Vivo Models of ARDS.

    Megan V. Jackson;Thomas J. Morrison;Declan F. Doherty;Daniel F. McAuley

  • Simvastatin in the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

    Daniel F. McAuley;John G. Laffey;John G. Laffey;Cecilia M. O'Kane;Gavin D. Perkins;Gavin D. Perkins

  • Guidelines on the management of acute respiratory distress syndrome

    Mark J D Griffiths;Danny Francis McAuley;Gavin D Perkins;Nicholas Barrett

  • Effect of intravenous haloperidol on the duration of delirium and coma in critically ill patients (Hope-ICU): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

    Valerie J Page;Valerie J Page;E Wesley Ely;Simon Gates;Xiao Bei Zhao

  • Genetic mechanisms of critical illness in Covid-19

    Erola Pairo-Castineira;Sara Clohisey;Lucija Klaric;Andrew Bretherick;Andrew Bretherick

Frequent Co-Authors

Gavin D. Perkins
Gavin D. Perkins University of Warwick
Michael A. Matthay
Michael A. Matthay University of California, San Francisco
John G. Laffey
John G. Laffey University of Galway
Eddy Fan
Eddy Fan University of Toronto
Graham Dunn
Graham Dunn University of Manchester
Mike Clarke
Mike Clarke Queen's University Belfast
Carolyn S. Calfee
Carolyn S. Calfee University of California, San Francisco
Clifford C. Taggart
Clifford C. Taggart Queen's University Belfast
Antonio Pesenti
Antonio Pesenti University of Milan
Adrien Kissenpfennig
Adrien Kissenpfennig Queen's University Belfast

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative career pathways in medicine and healthcare opens up a world of opportunities beyond becoming a physician. Many students choose fields that support patient care, administration, or the healthcare system at large. For those interested in the operational side of healthcare, medical billing and coding schools with financial aid offer flexible online programs, making it easier to enter this high-demand profession.

Nursing remains a very popular option, and you can discover absn programs that don't require teas, simplifying the admissions process for those with a non-nursing degree. If you're aiming for a leadership role, consider a healthcare administration accelerated degree online, which fast-tracks you into management positions in hospitals and clinics.

Registered nurses seeking career advancement can also explore bridge programs such as the asn to np pathways, designed to help you become a nurse practitioner more efficiently. These flexible degree options provide diverse routes to impactful healthcare careers.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel F. McAuley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles