World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 121 3600 3367 99 91 528 55504

Samir Jaber publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Samir Jaber between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Samir Jaber published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 22.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 57 publications in 2020. 62 of the 675 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 57. Peak 57 publications in 2020. 1996: 3 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 18 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 40 publications 2011: 24 publications 2012: 37 publications 2013: 40 publications 2014: 48 publications 2015: 36 publications 2016: 33 publications 2017: 31 publications 2018: 35 publications 2019: 41 publications 2020: 57 publications 2021: 31 publications 2022: 42 publications 2023: 23 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 44 publications
1996 2025

675 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Samir Jaber: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 3
1997 0
1998 1
1999 2
2000 3
2001 4
2002 4
2003 6
2004 4
2005 12
2006 11
2007 14
2008 18
2009 13
2010 40
2011 24
2012 37
2013 40
2014 48
2015 36
2016 33
2017 31
2018 35
2019 41
2020 57
2021 31
2022 42
2023 23
2024 18
2025 44
Total 675
Download as CSV

Samir Jaber publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Samir Jaber sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 521–540 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 528 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610 528
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Samir Jaber D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Samir Jaber sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 120–121 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 121 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287 121
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Samir Jaber is affiliated with the University of Montpellier in France and has contributed extensively to the field of Medicine, with a particular focus on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine. Their research portfolio also encompasses Surgery and Emergency Medicine.

The primary topics addressed in their work include:

  • Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
  • Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
  • Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Samir Jaber demonstrate a concentration on acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and respiratory support strategies. Notable publications include:

  • ESICM guidelines on acute respiratory distress syndrome: definition, phenotyping and respiratory support strategies, 2023, Intensive Care Medicine
  • Prone position in ARDS patients: why, when, how and for whom, 2020, Intensive Care Medicine
  • The role for high flow nasal cannula as a respiratory support strategy in adults: a clinical practice guideline, 2020, Intensive Care Medicine
  • Lung- and Diaphragm-Protective Ventilation, 2020, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
  • Analgesia and sedation in patients with ARDS, 2020, Intensive Care Medicine

Samir Jaber frequently publishes in several key venues, notably:

  • Intensive Care Medicine
  • Critical Care
  • Annals of Intensive Care
  • Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine
  • American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Collaborations are a significant aspect of their research activity. Frequent coauthors include Audrey De Jong, Gérald Chanques, Élie Azoulay, Emmanuel Futier, and Nicolas Molinari, reflecting a network of partnerships particularly within intensive care and respiratory medicine communities.

Best Publications

  • Prone Positioning in Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

    Claude Guérin;Jean Reignier;Jean-Christophe Richard;Pascal Beuret

  • Neuromuscular Blockers in Early Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

    Laurent Papazian;Jean-Marie Forel;Arnaud Gacouin;Christine Penot-Ragon

  • A Trial of Intraoperative Low-Tidal-Volume Ventilation in Abdominal Surgery

    Emmanuel Futier;Jean-Michel Constantin;Catherine Paugam-Burtz;Julien Pascal

  • Official ERS/ATS clinical practice guidelines: noninvasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure

    Bram Rochwerg;Laurent Brochard;Laurent Brochard;Mark W. Elliott;Dean Hess

  • Positive end-expiratory pressure setting in adults with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.

    Alain Mercat;Jean-Christophe M. Richard;Bruno Vielle;Samir Jaber

  • Effects of Fluid Resuscitation With Colloids vs Crystalloids on Mortality in Critically Ill Patients Presenting With Hypovolemic Shock: The CRISTAL Randomized Trial

    Djillali Annane;Shidasp Siami;Samir Jaber;Claude Martin

  • Effect of Individualized vs Standard Blood Pressure Management Strategies on Postoperative Organ Dysfunction Among High-Risk Patients Undergoing Major Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial

    Emmanuel Futier;Jean-Yves Lefrant;Pierre-Gregoire Guinot;Thomas Godet

  • Rapidly progressive diaphragmatic weakness and injury during mechanical ventilation in humans.

    Samir Jaber;Basil J. Petrof;Boris Jung;Gérald Chanques

  • Impact of systematic evaluation of pain and agitation in an intensive care unit

    Gerald Chanques;Samir Jaber;Eric Barbotte;Sophie Violet

  • Clinical practice and risk factors for immediate complications of endotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit: a prospective, multiple-center study.

    Samir Jaber;Jibba Amraoui;Jean-Yves Lefrant;Charles Arich

  • Formal guidelines: management of acute respiratory distress syndrome

    Laurent Papazian;Cécile Aubron;Laurent Brochard;Jean Daniel Chiche

  • Protective Mechanical Ventilation During General Anesthesia for Open Abdominal Surgery Improves Postoperative Pulmonary Function

    Paolo Severgnini;Gabriele Selmo;Christian Lanza;Alessandro Chiesa

  • Timing of Renal-Replacement Therapy in Patients with Acute Kidney Injury and Sepsis.

    Saber D. Barbar;Raphaël Clere-Jehl;Abderrahmane Bourredjem;Romain Hernu

  • Association between driving pressure and development of postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation for general anaesthesia: a meta-analysis of individual patient data.

    Ary Serpa Neto;Sabrine N.T. Hemmes;Carmen S.V. Barbas;Martin Beiderlinden

  • An intervention to decrease complications related to endotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit: a prospective, multiple-center study.

    Samir Jaber;Boris Jung;Philippe Corne;Mustapha Sebbane

  • Noninvasive Ventilation Improves Preoxygenation before Intubation of Hypoxic Patients

    Christophe Baillard;Jean-Philippe Fosse;Mustapha Sebbane;Gérald Chanques

  • Diaphragm dysfunction on admission to the intensive care unit. Prevalence, risk factors, and prognostic impact-a prospective study.

    Alexandre Demoule;Boris Jung;Hélène Prodanovic;Nicolas Molinari

  • Obesity in the critically ill: a narrative review.

    Miet Schetz;Audrey De Jong;Adam M Deane;Adam M Deane;Wilfried Druml

  • Discrepancies between Perceptions by Physicians and Nursing Staff of Intensive Care Unit End-of-Life Decisions

    Edouard Ferrand;François Lemaire;Bernard Regnier;Khaldoun Kuteifan

  • The measurement of pain in intensive care unit: Comparison of 5 self-report intensity scales

    Gérald Chanques;Eric Viel;Jean-Michel Constantin;Jean-Michel Constantin;Boris Jung

Frequent Co-Authors

Elie Azoulay
Elie Azoulay Université Paris Cité
Marc Leone
Marc Leone Aix-Marseille University
Laurent Papazian
Laurent Papazian Aix-Marseille University
Alexandre Demoule
Alexandre Demoule Sorbonne University
Paolo Pelosi
Paolo Pelosi University of Genoa
Marcus J. Schultz
Marcus J. Schultz University of Amsterdam
Michael Darmon
Michael Darmon Université Paris Cité
Giuseppe Citerio
Giuseppe Citerio University of Milano-Bicocca
Alain Cariou
Alain Cariou Université Paris Cité
Sylvie Chevret
Sylvie Chevret Université Paris Cité

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in pursuing a career in medicine or healthcare but seeking alternative or flexible pathways, several online degrees can expand your options. Many professionals choose to enhance their careers by earning advanced credentials in related fields without the need to attend traditional, on-campus programs.

If you are interested in healthcare management and leadership, consider exploring online mha programs affordable. These programs make it easier for aspiring administrators to enter the field without taking on excessive debt.

For nurses seeking the highest level of clinical expertise, evaluating your options for the cheapest dnp program can provide an affordable path to a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree.

Those interested in pharmacy careers can look into pharmacy school online accredited options that offer flexible, reputable education.

Additionally, with the growing importance of digital health records, a health information technology online degree prepares students for in-demand roles managing healthcare data.

Exploring these online pathways can open new doors in healthcare while offering convenience and affordability.

Best Scientists Citing Samir Jaber

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles