World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Paolo Pelosi

Paolo Pelosi

Award Badge
Medicine
Italy
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 126 2907 74 1125 73228

Paolo Pelosi publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Paolo Pelosi between 1984 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Paolo Pelosi published across 42 years, from 1984 to 2025, averaging 32.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 261 publications in 2012. 17 of the 1,373 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 261. Peak 261 publications in 2012. 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 13 publications 1991: 12 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 11 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 31 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 12 publications 1999: 13 publications 2000: 24 publications 2001: 22 publications 2002: 15 publications 2003: 15 publications 2004: 14 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 13 publications 2007: 17 publications 2008: 22 publications 2009: 37 publications 2010: 48 publications 2011: 43 publications 2012: 261 publications 2013: 35 publications 2014: 54 publications 2015: 62 publications 2016: 62 publications 2017: 56 publications 2018: 62 publications 2019: 58 publications 2020: 81 publications 2021: 97 publications 2022: 68 publications 2023: 55 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 6 publications
1984 2025

1,373 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Paolo Pelosi: publications per year, 1984 to 2025
Year Publications
1984 1
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 5
1989 2
1990 13
1991 12
1992 2
1993 5
1994 11
1995 8
1996 31
1997 9
1998 12
1999 13
2000 24
2001 22
2002 15
2003 15
2004 14
2005 11
2006 13
2007 17
2008 22
2009 37
2010 48
2011 43
2012 261
2013 35
2014 54
2015 62
2016 62
2017 56
2018 62
2019 58
2020 81
2021 97
2022 68
2023 55
2024 11
2025 6
Total 1,373
Download as CSV

Paolo Pelosi publications per year - data summary

  • Paolo Pelosi, a Medicine scholar from University of Genoa, has 1,373 publications recorded across 42 years, from 1984 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1984 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2012, with 261 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 1984, with 1 publication.
  • 3 of the 42 years in the span carry no publications at all (1985, 1986 and 1987).
  • The rate of publication averages 32.7 papers per year over the whole span, or 35.2 per year counting only the 39 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 237 publications, 17% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1984-1997: 99 publications (7.1 per year); 1998-2011: 306 publications (21.9 per year); 2012-2025: 968 publications (69.1 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Paolo Pelosi publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paolo Pelosi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 1,121–1,140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,125 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49 1,125
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Paolo Pelosi publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Paolo Pelosi, a Medicine scholar from University of Genoa, records 1,125 publications - the 96th percentile of the discipline.
  • 96% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Paolo Pelosi, and about 4% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Paolo Pelosi ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Paolo Pelosi D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paolo Pelosi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 126–127 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 126 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252 126
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Paolo Pelosi D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Paolo Pelosi, a Medicine scholar from University of Genoa, records 126 D-Index - the 86th percentile of the discipline.
  • 86% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Paolo Pelosi, and about 14% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Paolo Pelosi ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in Italy Leader Award

Overview

Paolo Pelosi is affiliated with the University of Genoa in Italy, where their research spans multiple interconnected fields of study.

The primary fields of research include:

  • Neuroscience
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Within these main areas, subfields of particular focus are:

  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Insect Science
  • Genetics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Paolo Pelosi's research topics cover a range of insect-related biological studies, including:

  • Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
  • Insect and Pesticide Research
  • Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
  • Plant and Animal Studies
  • Biotin and Related Studies
  • Silk-Based Biomaterials and Applications

Recent notable publications include:

  • "Molecular basis of (E)-β-farnesene-mediated aphid location in the predator Eupeodes corollae" (2022, Current Biology)
  • "Aromatic Volatiles and Odorant Receptor 25 Mediate Attraction of Eupeodes corollae to Flowers" (2020, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry)
  • "The Major Cat Allergen Fel d 1 Binds Steroid and Fatty Acid Semiochemicals: A Combined In Silico and In Vitro Study" (2020, International Journal of Molecular Sciences)
  • "Responses of the Pheromone-Binding Protein of the Silk Moth Bombyx mori on a Graphene Biosensor Match Binding Constants in Solution" (2021, Sensors)
  • "Aphid Odorant-Binding Protein 9 Is Narrowly Tuned to Linear Alcohols and Aldehydes of Sixteen Carbon Atoms" (2021, Insects)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Paolo Pelosi include:

  • Wolfgang Knoll (12 collaborations)
  • Jiao Zhu (7 collaborations)
  • Valeriia Zaremska (5 collaborations)
  • Chiara D'Onofrio (3 collaborations)
  • Francesca Romana Dani (3 collaborations)

The most common publication venues where their work has appeared are:

  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Current Biology
  • Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
  • Sensors
  • Insects

Best Publications

  • A trial of goal- oriented hemodynamic therapy in critically ill patients

    L Gattinoni;L Brazzi;P Pelosi;R Latini

  • Effect of prone positioning on the survival of patients with acute respiratory failure

    Luciano G. Gattinoni;Gianni Tognoni;Antonio Pesenti;Paolo Taccone

  • Mortality after surgery in Europe: a 7 day cohort study

    Rupert M. Pearse;Rui P Moreno;Peter Bauer;Paolo Pelosi

  • Acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by pulmonary and extrapulmonary disease. Different syndromes

    Luciano Gattinoni;Paolo Pelosi;Peter M. Suter;Alessia Pedoto

  • Incidence and prognosis of intraabdominal hypertension in a mixed population of critically ill patients: a multiple-center epidemiological study.

    Manu L N G Malbrain;Davide Chiumello;Paolo Pelosi;David Bihari

  • GUIDELINES FOR PRE-OPERATIVE CARDIAC RISK ASSESSMENT AND PERIOPERATIVE CARDIAC MANAGEMENT IN NON-CARDIAC SURGERY

    Don Poldermans;Jeroen J. Bax;Eric Boersma;Stefan De Hert

  • What Has Computed Tomography Taught Us about the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

    Luciano Gattinoni;Pietro Caironi;Paolo Pelosi;Lawrence R. Goodman

  • Evolution of Mechanical Ventilation in Response to Clinical Research

    Andre's Esteban;Niall D. Ferguson;Maureen O. Meade;Fernando Frutos-Vivar

  • Standards for definitions and use of outcome measures for clinical effectiveness research in perioperative medicine: European Perioperative Clinical Outcome (EPCO) definitions: a statement from the ESA-ESICM joint taskforce on perioperative outcome measures.

    Ib Jammer;Nadine Wickboldt;Michael Sander;Andrew Smith

  • Prevalence of intra-abdominal hypertension in critically ill patients: a multicentre epidemiological study.

    Manu L. N. G. Malbrain;Davide Chiumello;Paolo Pelosi;Alexander Wilmer

  • The effects of body mass on lung volumes, respiratory mechanics, and gas exchange during general anesthesia

    Paolo Pelosi;Massimo Croci;Irene Ravagnan;Stefano Tredici

  • Recruitment and derecruitment during acute respiratory failure: an experimental study.

    Paolo Pelosi;Mari Goldner;Andrew McKIBBEN;Alex Adams

  • High versus low positive end-expiratory pressure during general anaesthesia for open abdominal surgery (PROVHILO trial): a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

    Hemmes Sn;Gama de Abreu M;Pelosi P

  • Evolution of Mortality over Time in Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation

    Andrés Esteban;Fernando Frutos-Vivar;Alfonso Muriel;Niall D. Ferguson

  • Body position changes redistribute lung computed-tomographic density in patients with acute respiratory failure.

    Luciano Gattinoni;Paolo Pelosi;Giovanni Vitale;Antonio Pesenti

  • Guidelines for pre-operative cardiac risk assessment and perioperative cardiac management in non-cardiac surgery: the Task Force for Preoperative Cardiac Risk Assessment and Perioperative Cardiac Management in Non-cardiac Surgery of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and endorsed by the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA)

    Don Poldermans;Jeroen J. Bax;Eric Boersma;Stefan De Hert

  • Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on regional distribution of tidal volume and recruitment in adult respiratory distress syndrome

    L Gattinoni;P Pelosi;S Crotti;F Valenza

  • Recruitment and derecruitment during acute respiratory failure: a clinical study.

    Stefania Crotti;Daniele Mascheroni;Pietro Caironi;Paolo Pelosi

  • Hypothermia versus Normothermia after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

    Josef Dankiewicz;Tobias Cronberg;Gisela Lilja;Janus C. Jakobsen

  • What is an intensive care unit? A report of the task force of the World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine

    John C. Marshall;Laura Bosco;Neill K. Adhikari;Bronwen Connolly

Frequent Co-Authors

Luciano Gattinoni
Luciano Gattinoni University of Göttingen
Marcus J. Schultz
Marcus J. Schultz University of Amsterdam
Davide Chiumello
Davide Chiumello University of Milan
Antonio Pesenti
Antonio Pesenti University of Milan
Matteo Bassetti
Matteo Bassetti University of Genoa
Samir Jaber
Samir Jaber University of Montpellier
Göran Hedenstierna
Göran Hedenstierna Uppsala University
Rupert M. Pearse
Rupert M. Pearse Queen Mary University of London
Jean Louis Vincent
Jean Louis Vincent Université Libre de Bruxelles
Antonio Anzueto
Antonio Anzueto The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

With the evolving landscape of healthcare education, more students are exploring flexible options to advance their careers. Choosing online programs can offer convenience, speed, and cost-effectiveness without sacrificing quality. For example, those interested in mental health may want to consider the shortest pmhnp program, designed for fast-track entry into psychiatric mental health roles.

Aspiring leaders in healthcare settings can benefit from health administration degrees online. These programs provide comprehensive training in management, policy, and operations, key for directing health organizations. The cost of mha degree is another critical factor—affordable master's in healthcare administration (MHA) options help students elevate their qualifications without the financial burden.

For nurses seeking the highest level of practice and leadership roles, msn to dnp programs online present a practical pathway. By leveraging these online options, medical students and professionals can tailor their education to their career goals, flexibility needs, and budget.

Best Scientists Citing Paolo Pelosi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles