World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 41 7683 7169 4111 3734 130 22038

Melanie C. Green publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Melanie C. Green between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Melanie C. Green published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 5.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 36 publications in 2018. 15 of the 169 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 36. Peak 36 publications in 2018. 1995: 1 publication 1996: 2 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 12 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 2 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 8 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 36 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 11 publications
1995 2025

169 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Melanie C. Green: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 1
1996 2
1997 0
1998 3
1999 2
2000 4
2001 2
2002 1
2003 12
2004 4
2005 4
2006 5
2007 4
2008 4
2009 1
2010 2
2011 6
2012 3
2013 4
2014 1
2015 8
2016 2
2017 11
2018 36
2019 4
2020 7
2021 9
2022 4
2023 8
2024 4
2025 11
Total 169
Download as CSV

Melanie C. Green publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Melanie C. Green sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 130 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 130
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Melanie C. Green D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Melanie C. Green sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 41
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Melanie C. Green is affiliated with the University at Buffalo, State University of New York in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines, primarily within the social sciences, arts and humanities, and psychology. Their subfields of study include literature and literary theory, sociology and political science, gender studies, social psychology, and communication.

Their research interests encompass a variety of topics, notably media influence and health, media, gender, and advertising, media studies and communication, the impact of technology on adolescents, communication in education and healthcare, science education and perceptions, and educational games and gamification.

Several recent papers illustrate the thematic scope and contributions of their work. These include:

  • Reducing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among African Americans: the effects of narratives, character's self-persuasion, and trust in science, 2022, Journal of Behavioral Medicine
  • "Dear future woman of STEM": letters of advice from women in STEM, 2023, International Journal of STEM Education
  • Restorative Narratives, 2020, The Journal of Public Interest Communications
  • Need for Cognition, Transportability, and Engagement with Interactive Narratives, 2020, Games for Health Journal
  • The effect of embodying a woman scientist in virtual reality on men's gender biases, 2021, Technology Mind and Behavior

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Melissa M. Moore
  • Gili Freedman
  • Kaitlin Fitzgerald
  • Amy Shirong Lu
  • Debbe Thompson

Publishing venues where Melanie C. Green has multiple works include:

  • The International Encyclopedia of Media Psychology
  • Technology Mind and Behavior
  • Media Psychology
  • Psychology of Popular Media
  • Communication Research

Best Publications

  • The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives.

    Melanie C. Green;Timothy C. Brock

  • Understanding Media Enjoyment: The Role of Transportation Into Narrative Worlds

    Melanie C. Green;Timothy C. Brock;Geoff F. Kaufman

  • The psychology of the unthinkable: taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals.

    Philip E. Tetlock;Orie V. Kristel;S. Beth Elson;Melanie C. Green

  • Transportation Into Narrative Worlds: The Role of Prior Knowledge and Perceived Realism.

    Melanie C. Green

  • Telephone versus Face-to-Face Interviewing of National Probability Samples with Long Questionnaires: Comparisons of Respondent Satisficing and Social Desirability Response Bias

    Allyson L. Holbrook;Melanie C. Green;J. O. N. A. Krosnick

  • Narrative communication in cancer prevention and control: A framework to guide research and application

    Matthew W. Kreuter;Melanie C. Green;Joseph N. Cappella;Michael D. Slater

  • In the Mind's Eye Transportation-Imagery Model of Narrative Persuasion

    Melanie C. Green;Timothy C. Brock

  • Narratives and Cancer Communication

    Melanie C. Green

  • The Impact of "No Opinion" Response Options on Data Quality: Non-Attitude Reduction or an Invitation to Satisfice?

    Jon A. Krosnick;Allyson L. Holbrook;Matthew K. Berent;Richard T. Carson

  • Narrative Impact : Social and Cognitive Foundations

    Melanie C. Green;Jeffrey J. Strange;Timothy C. Brock

  • Social Network Sites and Well-Being: The Role of Social Connection:

    Jenna L. Clark;Sara B. Algoe;Melanie C. Green

  • Transportation Across Media: Repeated Exposure to Print and Film

    Melanie C. Green;Sheryl Kass;Jana Carrey;Benjamin Herzig

  • This Story Is Not for Everyone: Transportability and Narrative Persuasion

    Philip J. Mazzocco;Melanie C. Green;Jo A. Sasota;Norman W. Jones

  • The Transportation Scale–Short Form (TS–SF)

    Markus Appel;Timo Gnambs;Tobias Richter;Melanie C. Green

  • The Role of a Narrative's Emotional Flow in Promoting Persuasive Outcomes

    Robin L. Nabi;Melanie C. Green

  • You are who you watch: Identification and transportation effects on temporary self-concept

    Marc Sestir;Melanie C. Green

  • The Power of Fiction: Determinants and Boundaries

    Melanie C. Green;Jennifer Garst;Timothy C. Brock

  • Fictional narratives change beliefs: replications of Prentice, Gerrig, and Bailis (1997) with mixed corroboration.

    S. Christian Wheeler;Melanie C. Green;Timothy C. Brock

  • Transportation into narrative worlds: implications for entertainment media influences on tobacco use

    Melanie C. Green;Jenna L. Clark

  • Coping with Accountability Cross-Pressures: Low-Effort Evasive Tactics and High-Effort Quests for Complex Compromises

    Melanie C. Green;Penny S. Visser;Philip E. Tetlock

Frequent Co-Authors

Timothy C. Brock
Timothy C. Brock The Ohio State University
John Sabini
John Sabini University of Pennsylvania
Philip E. Tetlock
Philip E. Tetlock University of Pennsylvania
Jon A. Krosnick
Jon A. Krosnick Stanford University
S. Christian Wheeler
S. Christian Wheeler Stanford University
Allyson Holbrook
Allyson Holbrook University of Newcastle Australia
Daniel J. O'Keefe
Daniel J. O'Keefe Northwestern University
Laura A. King
Laura A. King University of Missouri
Robin L. Nabi
Robin L. Nabi University of California, Santa Barbara
Eddie M. Clark
Eddie M. Clark Saint Louis University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are considering a career in psychology, online degrees offer flexible options to start or advance your education. Many accredited universities now provide online bachelor’s and master’s degrees in psychology, counseling, or clinical mental health. These programs can help you meet the foundational requirements for a variety of roles, including licensed professional counselor (LPC), marriage and family therapist, or clinical psychologist.

Aspiring therapists should be aware that licensure requirements can vary by state and even by city. For example, the steps for licensed therapist requirements in Lubbock differ from licensed therapist requirements in Madison. Similarly, understanding the process for becoming a licensed therapist in Memphis may help you plan your education and supervised clinical experience. Those interested in Arizona should review the guidelines for becoming a licensed therapist in Mesa.

Exploring these pathways and staying informed about local requirements will help you make the most of your online degree and ensure a smooth path to licensure and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Melanie C. Green

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles