World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
59
Citations
23202
World Ranking
3626
National Ranking
2037

Linda J. Skitka publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda J. Skitka sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 143 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Linda J. Skitka D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda J. Skitka sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Linda J. Skitka is affiliated with the University of Illinois at Chicago in the United States. Their research spans several main fields, predominantly Social Sciences and Psychology. Subfields of study include Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology, and Political Science and International Relations.

Their work addresses multiple interconnected topics such as Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment, Social and Intergroup Psychology, Cultural Differences and Values, COVID-19 and Mental Health, Misinformation and Its Impacts, Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection, and Behavioral Health and Interventions.

Frequent collaborators in their research include Mina Cikara, James Druckman, Eli J. Finkel, David G. Rand, and Joshua A. Tucker.

Recent scholarly contributions include the following papers:

  • Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response (2020, Nature Human Behaviour)
  • Political sectarianism in America (2020, Science)
  • The Psychology of Moral Conviction (2020, Annual Review of Psychology)
  • A synthesis of evidence for policy from behavioural science during COVID-19 (2023, Nature)
  • Using Social and Behavioural Science to Support COVID-19 Pandemic Response (2022, SSRN Electronic Journal)

Their publications frequently appear in journals such as the British Journal of Social Psychology, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, PLoS ONE, Psychological Inquiry, and Nature Human Behaviour.

Best Publications

  • Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response.

    Jay J. Van Bavel;Katherine Baicker;Paulo S. Boggio;Valerio Capraro

  • Moral conviction: another contributor to attitude strength or something more?

    Linda J. Skitka;Christopher W. Bauman;Edward G. Sargis

  • Social and cognitive strategies for coping with accountability: conformity, complexity, and bolstering.

    Philip E. Tetlock;Linda Skitka;Richard Boettger

  • Political sectarianism in America

    Eli J. Finkel;Christopher A. Bail;Mina Cikara;Peter H. Ditto

  • Corporate social responsibility as a source of employee satisfaction

    Christopher W. Bauman;Linda J. Skitka

  • Does automation bias decision-making?

    Linda J. Skitka;Kathleen L. Mosier;Mark Burdick

  • The Psychology of Moral Conviction

    Linda J. Skitka

  • Morality in everyday life

    Wilhelm Hofmann;Daniel C. Wisneski;Mark J. Brandt;Linda J. Skitka

  • Providing public assistance: Cognitive and motivational processes underlying liberal and conservative policy preferences.

    Linda J. Skitka;Philip E. Tetlock

  • Dispositions, scripts, or motivated correction? Understanding ideological differences in explanations for social problems

    Linda J. Skitka;Elizabeth Mullen;Thomas D. Griffin;Susan Hutchinson

  • Political Tolerance and Coming to Psychological Closure Following the September 11, 2001, Terrorist Attacks: An Integrative Approach

    Linda J. Skitka;Christopher W. Bauman;Elizabeth Mullen

  • The Internet as Psychological Laboratory

    Linda J. Skitka;Edward G. Sargis

  • AUTOMATION BIAS: DECISION MAKING AND PERFORMANCE IN HIGH-TECH COCKPITS

    Kathleen L. Mosier;Linda J. Skitka;Susan Heers;Mark Burdick

  • Do the Means Always Justify the Ends, or Do the Ends Sometimes Justify the Means? A Value Protection Model of Justice Reasoning

    Linda J. Skitka

  • Human Decision Makers and Automated Decision Aids: Made for Each Other?

    Kathleen L. Mosier;Linda J. Skitka

  • Allocating scarce resources : a contingency model of distributive justice

    Linda J Skitka;Philip E Tetlock

  • Exploring the psychological underpinnings of the moral mandate effect: motivated reasoning, group differentiation, or anger?

    Elizabeth Mullen;Linda J. Skitka

  • Liberals and conservatives are similarly motivated to avoid exposure to one another's opinions

    Jeremy A. Frimer;Linda J. Skitka;Matt Motyl

  • Confrontational and Preventative Policy Responses to Terrorism: Anger Wants a Fight and Fear Wants "Them" to Go Away

    Linda J. Skitka;Christopher W. Bauman;Nicholas P. Aramovich;G. Scott Morgan

  • Moral Conviction and Political Engagement

    Linda J. Skitka;Christopher W. Bauman

  • The Psychology of Moral Conviction.

    Linda J Skitka;Brittany E Hanson;G Scott Morgan;Daniel C Wisneski

Frequent Co-Authors

Brad J. Bushman
Brad J. Bushman The Ohio State University
Mario Gollwitzer
Mario Gollwitzer Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Mark J. Brandt
Mark J. Brandt Michigan State University
Wilhelm Hofmann
Wilhelm Hofmann Ruhr University Bochum
Philip E. Tetlock
Philip E. Tetlock University of Pennsylvania
Jay J. Van Bavel
Jay J. Van Bavel New York University
Aleksandra Cichocka
Aleksandra Cichocka University of Kent
Christina Maslach
Christina Maslach University of California, Berkeley
Mina Cikara
Mina Cikara Harvard University
David G. Rand
David G. Rand Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens the door to a variety of rewarding career pathways, many of which are available online. Becoming a mental health counselor is a popular choice, but it's important to understand that educational and certification requirements may differ depending on your location.

For example, the Denver mental health counselor certification requirements outline the degrees and supervised experience needed to practice in Colorado. Similarly, those interested in practicing in Michigan should review the Detroit mental health counselor certification requirements.

If you are aiming to start your counseling career in North Carolina, familiarize yourself with the Durham mental health counselor certification requirements. Meanwhile, in Texas, knowing the El Paso mental health counselor education requirements is essential.

No matter where you plan to practice, pursuing an online psychology degree provides a flexible foundation. Be sure to research the specific licensure process for your area to ensure a smooth transition into this dynamic and growing field.

Best Scientists Citing Linda J. Skitka

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles