World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jan-Willem van Prooijen

Jan-Willem van Prooijen

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
55
Citations
12295
World Ranking
4382
National Ranking
209

Jan-Willem van Prooijen publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan-Willem van Prooijen sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 178 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jan-Willem van Prooijen D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan-Willem van Prooijen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jan-Willem van Prooijen is affiliated with Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam in the Netherlands, contributing extensively to the field of social sciences with an emphasis on sociology, political science, cognitive neuroscience, social psychology, artificial intelligence, and health.

Their research encompasses a range of topics including misinformation and its impacts, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, social and intergroup psychology, hate speech and cyberbullying detection, cultural differences and values, social media and politics, and vaccine coverage and hesitancy.

Jan-Willem van Prooijen has published multiple papers in notable academic journals. Some recent significant papers include:

  • Conspiracy mentality and political orientation across 26 countries (2022), published in Nature Human Behaviour
  • Suspicion of institutions: How distrust and conspiracy theories deteriorate social relationships (2021), published in Current Opinion in Psychology
  • Enhancing feelings of security: How institutional trust promotes interpersonal trust (2020), published in PLoS ONE
  • The entertainment value of conspiracy theories (2021), published in British Journal of Psychology
  • The cultural dimension of intergroup conspiracy theories (2020), published in British Journal of Psychology

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers in their field. Notable co-authors include Paul A. M. Van Lange, André Krouwel, Kyriaki Fousiani, Myrto Pantazi, and Yongyu Guo.

Publication venues where Jan-Willem van Prooijen's work appears most often include:

  • British Journal of Psychology
  • Political Psychology
  • British Journal of Social Psychology
  • European Journal of Social Psychology
  • Nature Human Behaviour

Their scholarly contributions notably intersect with areas of social and political psychology, engaging with cultural, cognitive, and technological dimensions of social behavior. The wide range of topics addressed reflects a multidisciplinary approach to understanding social phenomena, particularly focusing on aspects related to misinformation, trust, conspiracy theories, and social relationships.

Best Publications

  • Conspiracy theories as part of history: The role of societal crisis situations

    Jan Willem van Prooijen;Karen M. Douglas

  • Political Extremism Predicts Belief in Conspiracy Theories

    Jan-Willem van Prooijen;André P. M. Krouwel;Thomas V. Pollet

  • Why Education Predicts Decreased Belief in Conspiracy Theories.

    Jan Willem van Prooijen

  • CONFIRMATORY ANALYSIS OF EXPLORATIVELY OBTAINED FACTOR STRUCTURES

    Jan-Willem van Prooijen;Willem A. van der Kloot

  • Belief in conspiracy theories: Basic principles of an emerging research domain

    Jan Willem van Prooijen;Karen M. Douglas

  • Belief in conspiracy theories: The influence of uncertainty and perceived morality

    Jan-Willem van Prooijen;Nils B. Jostmann

  • The Influence of Control on Belief in Conspiracy Theories: Conceptual and Applied Extensions

    Jan-Willem van Prooijen;Michele Acker

  • Conspiracy Theories: Evolved Functions and Psychological Mechanisms

    Jan Willem van Prooijen;Mark van Vugt;Mark van Vugt

  • Connecting the dots: Illusory pattern perception predicts belief in conspiracies and the supernatural

    Jan Willem van Prooijen;Karen M. Douglas;Clara De Inocencio;Clara De Inocencio

  • National identity predicts public health support during a global pandemic

    Unknown

  • Epistemic rationality: Skepticism toward unfounded beliefs requires sufficient cognitive ability and motivation to be rational

    Tomas Ståhl;Jan Willem van Prooijen

  • Psychological Features of Extreme Political Ideologies

    Jan Willem van Prooijen;André P.M. Krouwel

  • Procedural justice and status: status salience as antecedent of procedural fairness effects.

    Jan-Willem van Prooijen;Kees van den Bos;Henk A. M. Wilke

  • Group belongingness and procedural justice: social inclusion and exclusion by peers affects the psychology of voice.

    Jan-Willem van Prooijen;Kees van den Bos;Henk A. M. Wilke

  • An Existential Threat Model of Conspiracy Theories

    Jan Willem Van Prooijen

  • “Who Doesn’t?”—The Impact of Descriptive Norms on Corruption

    Nils C. Köbis;Jan-Willem van Prooijen;Francesca Righetti;Paul A. M. Van Lange

  • Be Aware to Care: Public Self-Awareness Leads to a Reversal of the Bystander Effect.

    Marco van Bommel;Jan-Willem van Prooijen;Henk Elffers;Paul A.M. Van Lange

  • Fear Among the Extremes How Political Ideology Predicts Negative Emotions and Outgroup Derogation

    Jan-Willem van Prooijen;André P. M. Krouwel;Max Boiten;Lennart Eendebak

  • When consequence size predicts belief in conspiracy theories: The moderating role of perspective taking

    Jan-Willem van Prooijen;Eric van Dijk

  • Suspicion of institutions: How distrust and conspiracy theories deteriorate social relationships.

    Jan-Willem van Prooijen;Giuliana Spadaro;Haiyan Wang

  • Procedural Justice as Autonomy Regulation

    Jan-Willem van Prooijen

  • Extreme Political Beliefs Predict Dogmatic Intolerance

    Jan-Willem van Prooijen;André P. M. Krouwel

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul A. M. Van Lange
Paul A. M. Van Lange Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
André Krouwel
André Krouwel Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Kees van den Bos
Kees van den Bos Utrecht University
Eric van Dijk
Eric van Dijk Leiden University
Henk A. M. Wilke
Henk A. M. Wilke Leiden University
Karen M. Douglas
Karen M. Douglas University of Kent
Reinout E. de Vries
Reinout E. de Vries Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Ilja van Beest
Ilja van Beest Tilburg University
Mark van Vugt
Mark van Vugt Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Olivier Klein
Olivier Klein Université Libre de Bruxelles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Psychology in the USA opens doors to a diverse array of online degrees and career pathways, many centered around helping individuals and communities thrive. One fast-growing field is Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA), with the Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) credential widely recognized as a professional standard.

Pursuing BCBA certification requires specialized graduate coursework, supervised fieldwork, and passing a rigorous exam. The bcba certification requirements in Oakland highlight the need for accredited education and practical training. Similarly, the Oklahoma City bcba education requirements reinforce the importance of advanced degrees, often completed online, to accommodate working professionals.

Aspiring behavior analysts in other regions can benefit from tailored guidance such as the Omaha bcba education requirements and the bcba certification requirements in Orlando. These pathways often begin with a bachelor’s in psychology followed by specialized online master’s programs, supporting career advancement in clinical, educational, and community settings across the nation.

Best Scientists Citing Jan-Willem van Prooijen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles