H-Index & Metrics Best Publications

H-Index & Metrics

Discipline name H-index Citations Publications World Ranking National Ranking
Psychology D-index 31 Citations 4,862 91 World Ranking 7493 National Ranking 328

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Social psychology
  • Epistemology
  • Self-esteem

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Social psychology, Procedural justice, Developmental psychology, Ideology and Ingroups and outgroups. Jan-Willem van Prooijen is interested in Feeling, which is a branch of Social psychology. His Procedural justice research incorporates elements of Justice, Belongingness and Social cognition.

His work on Emotional regulation as part of general Developmental psychology research is often related to Social class, Complex problems and Low education, thus linking different fields of science. His research in the fields of Political spectrum overlaps with other disciplines such as Immigration, Derogation and Historical record. His work in Ingroups and outgroups addresses subjects such as Outgroup, which are connected to disciplines such as Punishment.

His most cited work include:

  • CONFIRMATORY ANALYSIS OF EXPLORATIVELY OBTAINED FACTOR STRUCTURES (230 citations)
  • Political Extremism Predicts Belief in Conspiracy Theories (126 citations)
  • Belief in conspiracy theories: The influence of uncertainty and perceived morality (114 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His scientific interests lie mostly in Social psychology, Criminology, Punishment, Procedural justice and Developmental psychology. His Feeling and Outgroup study in the realm of Social psychology connects with subjects such as Ideology, Context and Retributive justice. By researching both Retributive justice and Justice, Jan-Willem van Prooijen produces research that crosses academic boundaries.

His biological study focuses on Restorative justice. The study incorporates disciplines such as Social relation, Social cognition and Injustice in addition to Procedural justice. Jan-Willem van Prooijen integrates many fields in his works, including Social cognition and Equity.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Social psychology (65.15%)
  • Criminology (13.64%)
  • Punishment (12.88%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2019-2021)?

  • Social psychology (65.15%)
  • Feeling (7.58%)
  • Ideology (6.82%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Social psychology, Feeling, Ideology, Biology and political orientation and Political economy are his primary areas of study. His study brings together the fields of Mechanism and Social psychology. Jan-Willem van Prooijen interconnects Public discourse, Fundamentalism and Polarization in the investigation of issues within Ideology.

His Political economy research integrates issues from High status and Hypocrisy. His Populism study incorporates themes from Voting and Voting behavior. His Hofstede's cultural dimensions theory research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Cultural cognition, Situated cognition and Masculinity.

Between 2019 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • An Existential Threat Model of Conspiracy Theories (11 citations)
  • Overclaiming Knowledge Predicts Anti-establishment Voting: (5 citations)
  • Mere presence of informal guardians deters burglars: a virtual reality study (3 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Social psychology
  • Epistemology
  • Self-esteem

His primary areas of study are Feeling, Political economy, Populism, Social psychology and Threat model. His Feeling research includes themes of Interpersonal communication and Set. Among his Political economy studies, you can observe a synthesis of other disciplines of science such as Voting behavior, European integration, Biology and political orientation, Political radicalism and Voting.

There are a combination of areas like Overconfidence effect, Brexit and Distrust integrated together with his Populism study. Many of his Social psychology research pursuits overlap with Fundamentalism, Polarization, Ideology, Grievance and Scientific debate. Threat model is intertwined with Comprehension, Distressing, Psychoanalysis and Existentialism in his research.

This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.

Best Publications

CONFIRMATORY ANALYSIS OF EXPLORATIVELY OBTAINED FACTOR STRUCTURES

Jan-Willem van Prooijen;Willem A. van der Kloot.
Educational and Psychological Measurement (2001)

423 Citations

Belief in conspiracy theories: The influence of uncertainty and perceived morality

Jan-Willem van Prooijen;Nils B. Jostmann.
European Journal of Social Psychology (2013)

277 Citations

Political Extremism Predicts Belief in Conspiracy Theories

Jan-Willem van Prooijen;André P. M. Krouwel;Thomas V. Pollet.
Social Psychological and Personality Science (2015)

267 Citations

Why Education Predicts Decreased Belief in Conspiracy Theories.

Jan Willem van Prooijen.
Applied Cognitive Psychology (2017)

238 Citations

The Influence of Control on Belief in Conspiracy Theories: Conceptual and Applied Extensions

Jan-Willem van Prooijen;Michele Acker.
Applied Cognitive Psychology (2015)

225 Citations

Procedural justice and status: status salience as antecedent of procedural fairness effects.

Jan-Willem van Prooijen;Kees van den Bos;Henk A. M. Wilke.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (2002)

184 Citations

Conspiracy theories as part of history: The role of societal crisis situations

Jan Willem van Prooijen;Karen M. Douglas.
Memory Studies (2017)

175 Citations

Group belongingness and procedural justice: social inclusion and exclusion by peers affects the psychology of voice.

Jan-Willem van Prooijen;Kees van den Bos;Henk A. M. Wilke.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (2004)

175 Citations

Be Aware to Care: Public Self-Awareness Leads to a Reversal of the Bystander Effect.

Marco van Bommel;Jan-Willem van Prooijen;Henk Elffers;Paul A.M. Van Lange.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (2012)

147 Citations

Procedural Justice as Autonomy Regulation

Jan-Willem van Prooijen.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (2009)

134 Citations

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Contact us

Best Scientists Citing Jan-Willem van Prooijen

David De Cremer

David De Cremer

National University of Singapore

Publications: 33

Karen M. Douglas

Karen M. Douglas

University of Kent

Publications: 25

Kees van den Bos

Kees van den Bos

Utrecht University

Publications: 21

Robbie M. Sutton

Robbie M. Sutton

University of Kent

Publications: 15

Paul A. M. Van Lange

Paul A. M. Van Lange

Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

Publications: 11

Mario Gollwitzer

Mario Gollwitzer

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

Publications: 9

Michael Wenzel

Michael Wenzel

Flinders University

Publications: 9

Viren Swami

Viren Swami

Anglia Ruskin University

Publications: 9

Fong Chan

Fong Chan

University of Wisconsin–Madison

Publications: 9

Matthew J. Hornsey

Matthew J. Hornsey

University of Queensland

Publications: 9

David M. Mayer

David M. Mayer

University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

Publications: 8

Michael J. Platow

Michael J. Platow

Australian National University

Publications: 8

Tom R. Tyler

Tom R. Tyler

Yale University

Publications: 8

Adrian Furnham

Adrian Furnham

BI Norwegian Business School

Publications: 8

Naomi Ellemers

Naomi Ellemers

Utrecht University

Publications: 7

Constantine Sedikides

Constantine Sedikides

University of Southampton

Publications: 7

Something went wrong. Please try again later.