World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
8862
World Ranking
7794
National Ranking
351

Sabine Otten publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sabine Otten sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 183 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Sabine Otten D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sabine Otten sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sabine Otten is affiliated with the University of Groningen in the Netherlands. Their research spans the disciplines of social sciences and psychology, with emphasized subfields including sociology and political science, social psychology, public health, environmental and occupational health, communication, and gender studies.

The primary topics of Otten's work include social and intergroup psychology, ethics in clinical research, international student and expatriate challenges, cultural differences and values, gender diversity and inequality, global education and multiculturalism, and racial and ethnic identity research.

Otten has contributed to multiple peer-reviewed publications, with frequent appearances in several academic venues:

  • Research Square (Research Square)
  • Nature Human Behaviour
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • European Journal of Social Psychology
  • European Journal of Human Genetics

Some of Otten's recent papers include:

  • A large-scale test of the link between intergroup contact and support for social change, 2020, Nature Human Behaviour
  • Need satisfaction in intergroup contact: A multinational study of pathways toward social change., 2021, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • Frustration-affirmation? Thwarted goals motivate compliance with social norms for violence and nonviolence., 2020, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • Polarization in attitudes towards refugees and migrants in the Netherlands, 2021, European Journal of Social Psychology
  • Demographic and prosocial intrapersonal characteristics of biobank participants and refusers: the findings of a survey in the Netherlands, 2020, European Journal of Human Genetics

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Reinder Broekstra
  • Judith Aris-Meijer
  • Els Maeckelberghe
  • Ronald P. Stolk
  • Tabea Häßler

Otten's scholarly output reflects diverse interests in social dynamics, psychological processes, and health-related social research, contributing to understanding intergroup relations, social norms, and ethical dimensions in clinical research across multiple cultural and social contexts.

Best Publications

  • The Social Identity Perspective Intergroup Relations, Self-Conception, and Small Groups

    Michael A. Hogg;Dominic Abrams;Sabine Otten;Steve Hinkle

  • Overlap of Self, Ingroup, and Outgroup: Pictorial Measures of Self-Categorization.

    Thomas W. Schubert;Sabine Otten

  • Illegitimacy Moderates the Effects of Power on Approach

    Joris Lammers;Adam D. Galinsky;Ernestine H. Gordijn;Sabine Otten

  • Inclusion: Conceptualization and measurement

    Wiebren S. Jansen;Sabine Otten;Karen I. van der Zee;Lise Jans

  • Positive–Negative Asymmetry in Social Discrimination

    Amélie Mummendey;Sabine Otten

  • About the impact of automaticity in the minimal group paradigm: evidence from affective priming tasks

    Sabine Otten;Dirk Wentura

  • Power increases social distance

    Joris Lammers;Adam D. Galinsky;Ernestine H. Gordijn;Sabine Otten

  • Evidence for implicit evaluative in-group bias: Affect-biased spontaneous trait inference in a minimal group paradigm.

    Sabine Otten;Gordon B. Moskowitz

  • A three-dimensional model of women's empowerment : Implications in the field of microfinance and future directions

    Marloes A. Huis;Nina Hansen;Sabine Otten;Robert Lensink

  • Self-Anchoring and In-Group Favoritism: An Individual Profiles Analysis

    Sabine Otten;Dirk Wentura

  • Intergroup Discrimination in Positive and Negative Outcome Allocations: Impact of Stimulus Valence, Relative Group Status, and Relative Group Size

    Sabine Otten;Amelie Mummendey;Mathias Blanz

  • Looking through the eyes of the powerful

    Joris Lammers;Ernestine H. Gordijn;Sabine Otten

  • What I think you see is what you get: Influence of prejudice on assimilation to negative meta-stereotypes among Dutch Moroccan teenagers

    Elanor Kamans;Ernestine H. Gordijn;Hilbrand Oldenhuis;Sabine Otten

  • Cultural diversity in organizations: Enhancing identification by valuing differences

    Kyra Luijters;Karen I. van der Zee;Sabine Otten

  • The Challenge of Merging: Merger Patterns, Premerger Status, and Merger Support

    Steffen R. Giessner;G. Tendayi Viki;Sabine Otten;Deborah J. Terry

  • An Integrative Model of Social Identification Self-Stereotyping and Self-Anchoring as Two Cognitive Pathways

    Ruth Van Veelen;Sabine Otten;Maria Rosaria Cadinu;Nina Hansen

  • Overlapping Mental Representations of Self, Ingroup, and Outgroup: Unraveling Self-Stereotyping and Self-Anchoring

    Sabine Otten;Kai Epstude

  • A large-scale test of the link between intergroup contact and support for social change.

    Tabea Hässler;Johannes Ullrich;Michelle Bernardino;Nurit Shnabel

  • Being part of diversity: The effects of an all-inclusive multicultural diversity approach on majority members’ perceived inclusion and support for organizational diversity efforts

    Wiebren S. Jansen;Sabine Otten;Karen I. van der Zee

  • Positive-Negative Asymmetry in Social Discrimination: Valence of Evaluation and Salience of Categorization

    Amélie Mummendey;Sabine Otten;Uwe Berger;Thomas Kessler

  • The social self: Cognitive, interpersonal and intergroup perspectives

    Sabine Otten

  • The positive-negative asymmetry of social discrimination

    A Mummendey;Sabine Otten

Frequent Co-Authors

Amélie Mummendey
Amélie Mummendey Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Karen I. van der Zee
Karen I. van der Zee Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Joris Lammers
Joris Lammers University of Cologne
Robert Lensink
Robert Lensink University of Groningen
Thomas Kessler
Thomas Kessler Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Dominic Abrams
Dominic Abrams University of Kent
Russell Spears
Russell Spears University of Groningen
Martijn van Zomeren
Martijn van Zomeren University of Groningen
Kai Sassenberg
Kai Sassenberg Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology
Roberto Baiocco
Roberto Baiocco Sapienza University of Rome

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Psychology degree in the USA opens doors to diverse career options and specialized online programs. Many students look to fields such as behavior analysis or social work, both of which can be pursued through online education for increased flexibility. For example, becoming a bcba in Wisconsin involves meeting educational and practical experience requirements, which can often be completed online for added convenience. Similarly, understanding Wyoming bcba education requirements reveals steps like coursework, supervised hours, and certification—all vital to becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst.

Social work is another popular career path for psychology graduates. Steps to becoming a social worker in Alabama include earning a relevant degree and obtaining licensure, which many find accessible through online programs. Those exploring how to become a social worker in Alaska should be aware of unique state-specific requirements, but online education can often fulfill most academic criteria wherever you live.

By leveraging accredited online degrees, students can prepare for rewarding careers in psychology, behavior analysis, or social work—adapting their education to fit their personal and professional needs.

Best Scientists Citing Sabine Otten

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles