World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 62 3168 2915 1796 1614 192 35703

Derek D. Rucker publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Derek D. Rucker between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Derek D. Rucker published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 9.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2015. 12 of the 239 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2015. 2000: 2 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 22 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 7 publications
2000 2025

239 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Derek D. Rucker: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 2
2001 1
2002 2
2003 2
2004 9
2005 4
2006 3
2007 8
2008 11
2009 12
2010 11
2011 15
2012 11
2013 7
2014 17
2015 22
2016 18
2017 9
2018 14
2019 6
2020 15
2021 11
2022 6
2023 11
2024 5
2025 7
Total 239
Download as CSV

Derek D. Rucker publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Derek D. Rucker sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 191–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 192 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343 192
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Derek D. Rucker D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Derek D. Rucker sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62–63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248 62
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Derek D. Rucker is affiliated with Northwestern University in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of psychology, with a focus on several interconnected subfields including sociology and political science, social psychology, marketing, applied psychology, and organizational behavior and human resource management.

Their work addresses a variety of topics related to consumer behavior, cultural differences, social and intergroup psychology, behavioral health interventions, digital marketing, sentiment analysis, and evolutionary psychology. Key areas of study include:

  • Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

Rucker has collaborated frequently with several scholars, including Zakary L. Tormala, Adam D. Galinsky, Loran F. Nordgren, Richard E. Petty, and Chloe Levin.

The scientist has published multiple papers in a range of venues, with frequent publications in:

  • Current Opinion in Psychology
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • Journal of Consumer Research
  • Journal of the Association for Consumer Research
  • Kellogg School of Management Cases

Recent papers by Rucker include:

  • The Attitude-Behavior Relationship Revisited (2021), Psychological Science
  • Mass-scale emotionality reveals human behaviour and marketplace success (2021), Nature Human Behaviour
  • How Marketing Perks Influence Word of Mouth (2021), Journal of Marketing
  • Emotionally Numb: Expertise Dulls Consumer Experience (2021), Journal of Consumer Research
  • The hierarchy of voice framework: The dynamic relationship between employee voice and social hierarchy (2022), Research in Organizational Behavior

Their contributions also extend into book publications, including works published by the Kellogg School of Management eBooks. One noted title is Merrick Pet Care: Trial, Error, and Success, published in 2022.

Best Publications

  • Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions.

    Kristopher J. Preacher;Derek D. Rucker;Andrew F. Hayes

  • On the Practice of Dichotomization of Quantitative Variables

    Robert C. MacCallum;Shaobo Zhang;Kristopher J. Preacher;Derek D. Rucker

  • Mediation Analysis in Social Psychology: Current Practices and New Recommendations

    Derek D. Rucker;Kristopher J. Preacher;Zakary L. Tormala;Richard E. Petty

  • Desire to Acquire: Powerlessness and Compensatory Consumption

    Derek D. Rucker;Adam D. Galinsky

  • Use of the extreme groups approach: a critical reexamination and new recommendations.

    Kristopher J. Preacher;Derek D. Rucker;Robert C. MacCallum;W. Alan Nicewander

  • Beyond valence in the perception of likelihood: the role of emotion specificity.

    David DeSteno;Richard E. Petty;Duane T. Wegener;Derek D. Rucker

  • Power and consumer behavior: How power shapes who and what consumers value

    Derek D. Rucker;Adam D. Galinsky;David Dubois

  • Discrete Emotions and Persuasion: The Role of Emotion-Induced Expectancies

    David DeSteno;Richard E. Petty;Derek D. Rucker;Duane T. Wegener

  • On Braggarts and Gossips: A Self-Enhancement Account of Word-of-Mouth Generation and Transmission:

    Matteo De Angelis;Andrea Bonezzi;Alessandro M . Peluso;Alessandro M . Peluso;Derek D . Rucker

  • The Compensatory Consumer Behavior Model: How self-discrepancies drive consumer behavior

    Naomi Mandel;Derek D. Rucker;Jonathan Levav;Adam D. Galinsky

  • Conspicuous consumption versus utilitarian ideals: How different levels of power shape consumer behavior

    Derek D. Rucker;Adam D. Galinsky

  • The effects of message recipients' power before and after persuasion: a self-validation analysis.

    Pablo Briñol;Richard E. Petty;Carmen Valle;Derek D. Rucker

  • Social class, power, and selfishness: when and why upper and lower class individuals behave unethically.

    David Dubois;Derek D. Rucker;Adam D. Galinsky

  • Unpacking attitude certainty: attitude clarity and attitude correctness.

    John V. Petrocelli;Zakary L. Tormala;Derek D. Rucker

  • Generous Paupers and Stingy Princes: Power Drives Consumer Spending on Self versus Others

    Derek D. Rucker;David Dubois;Adam D. Galinsky

  • Super Size Me: Product Size as a Signal of Status

    David Dubois;Derek D. Rucker;Adam D. Galinsky

  • Power: Past findings, present considerations, and future directions.

    Adam D. Galinsky;Derek D. Rucker;Joe C. Magee

  • Power and Choice Their Dynamic Interplay in Quenching the Thirst for Personal Control

    M. Ena Inesi;Simona Botti;David Dubois;Derek D. Rucker

  • The Loss of Loss Aversion: Will It Loom Larger Than Its Gain?

    David Gal;Derek D. Rucker

  • Consumer conviction and commitment: An appraisal-based framework for attitude certainty

    Derek D. Rucker;Zakary L. Tormala;Richard E. Petty;Pablo Briñol

  • Attitude Certainty: A Review of Past Findings and Emerging Perspectives

    Zakary L. Tormala;Derek D. Rucker

Frequent Co-Authors

Adam D. Galinsky
Adam D. Galinsky Columbia University
Richard E. Petty
Richard E. Petty The Ohio State University
Zakary L. Tormala
Zakary L. Tormala Stanford University
Pablo Briñol
Pablo Briñol Autonomous University of Madrid
Alessandro M. Peluso
Alessandro M. Peluso University of Salento
Kristopher J. Preacher
Kristopher J. Preacher Vanderbilt University
David Dubois
David Dubois University of Illinois at Chicago
Michael I. Norton
Michael I. Norton Harvard University
Joris Lammers
Joris Lammers University of Cologne
David DeSteno
David DeSteno Northeastern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degrees and rewarding career paths. Many students with a background in psychology consider continuing their education in social work, counseling, or mental health services. These fields require both academic knowledge and practical skills, and online programs make it convenient to balance study with other responsibilities.

Affordability is an important factor when choosing a program. There are several affordable social work programs in Nevada that cater to online learners seeking budget-friendly options. Students in the Midwest can also benefit from researching the most affordable social work degree programs in Ohio, while those in the Northeast will find options with affordable social work degrees in Pennsylvania.

If you are located on the West Coast, you might consider enrolling in one of the affordable social work programs in Portland. Exploring these related online programs can help you discover a career pathway that matches your goals, interests, and budget—all while making a positive impact in your community.

Best Scientists Citing Derek D. Rucker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles