World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
87
Citations
53224
World Ranking
533
National Ranking
77

Richard M. Warwick publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard M. Warwick sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 258 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Richard M. Warwick D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard M. Warwick sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard M. Warwick is affiliated with the Plymouth Marine Laboratory in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science, with particular focus on Oceanography, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Atmospheric Science, and Aquatic Science.

The scientist's work centers on several main topics, including:

  • Marine Biology and Ecology Research
  • Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies
  • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Marine and fisheries research
  • Marine and coastal plant biology
  • Polar Research and Ecology
  • Parasite Biology and Host Interactions

Richard M. Warwick has contributed to multiple recent scientific publications, including:

  • "Seagrass 'fairy circles' on the Isles of Scilly" (2022), published in the Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom
  • "The Contrasting Ecology of Free-Living Nematodes in Macrotidal and Microtidal Estuaries" (2020), published in Estuaries and Coasts
  • "Irregular recruitment of the echinoid Echinocyamus pusillus and its implications for biological traits analysis" (2020), published in the Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom

Other recent papers from the collaborative networks involving Warwick include "Influences of microtidal regime and eutrophication on estuarine zooplankton" (2020), authored by Thomas H. Rose and published in Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science.

The frequent coauthors working with Warwick include J.R. Tweedley, I. C. Potter, Thomas H. Rose, M. Hourston, and Bryony Pearce. The scientist has published frequently in venues such as:

  • Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom
  • Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science
  • Estuaries and Coasts
  • Austral Ecology
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Best Publications

  • Change in marine communities : an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation

    K. Robert Clarke;Richard Martyn Warwick

  • A practical strategy for analysing multispecies distribution patterns

    JG Field;KR Clarke;RM Warwick

  • A taxonomic distinctness index and its statistical properties

    K. R. Clarke;R. M. Warwick

  • A further biodiversity index applicable to species lists: variation in taxonomic distinctness

    K. R. Clarke;R. M. Warwick

  • A new method for detecting pollution effects on marine macrobenthic communities

    R.M. Warwick

  • New biodiversity measures reveal a decrease in taxonomic distinctness with increasing stress

    R. M. Warwick;K. R. Clarke

  • Freeliving marine nematodes: Part II. British Chromadorida. Synopses of the British Fauna No. 38

    H.M. Platt;R.M. Warwick

  • Environmental impact studies on marine communities: Pragmatical considerations

    R. M. Warwick

  • Freeliving marine nematodes. Part 1: British enoplids. Pictorial key to world genera and notes for the identification of British species.

    H. M. Platt;R. M. Warwick

  • Similarity-based testing for community pattern: the two-way layout with no replication

    K.R. Clarke;R.M. Warwick

  • Taxonomic distinctness and environmental assessment

    R. M. Warwick;K R. Clarke

  • Increased variability as a symptom of stress in marine communities

    R.M. Warwick;K.R. Clarke

  • Detection Of Initial Effects Of Pollution On Marine Benthos - An Example From The Ekofisk And Eldfisk Oilfields North-Sea

    J.S. Gray;K.R. Clarke;R.M. Warwick;G. Hobbs

  • The level of taxonomic discrimination required to detect pollution effects on marine benthic communities

    R.M. Warwick

  • A Comparison of some methods for analysing changes in benthic community structure

    R.M. Warwick;K.R. Clarke

  • The taxonomic distinctness measure of biodiversity: weighting of step lengths between hierarchical levels

    KR Clarke;RM Warwick

  • Organic carbon content of sediments as an indicator of stress in the marine benthos

    J Hyland;L Balthis;I Karakassis;P Magni

  • Comparing the severity of disturbance: a metaanalysis of marine macrobenthic community data

    RM Warwick;KR Clarke

  • Practical measures of marine biodiversity based on relatedness of species

    R.M. Warwick;K.R. Clarke

  • Free-living marine nematodes

    Howard M. Platt;Richard Martyn Warwick

Frequent Co-Authors

K.R. Clarke
K.R. Clarke Plymouth Marine Laboratory
Paul J. Somerfield
Paul J. Somerfield Plymouth Marine Laboratory
Ian C. Potter
Ian C. Potter Murdoch University
Melanie C. Austen
Melanie C. Austen Plymouth University
John S. Gray
John S. Gray University of Oslo
Martin J. Attrill
Martin J. Attrill Plymouth University
Michaela Schratzberger
Michaela Schratzberger Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science
Carlo H. R. Heip
Carlo H. R. Heip Ghent University
Michael Moore
Michael Moore Plymouth Marine Laboratory
John G. Field
John G. Field University of Cape Town

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in bridging the gap between Ecology and Evolution studies and a healthcare career, several convenient online degree pathways are available. Many learners with an associate degree in nursing can advance quickly through asn to np programs, helping them move into advanced practice nursing roles while building on their existing skills.

Those who do not have a traditional nursing background might consider online msn programs for non nurses. These accelerated programs open new doors for career changers or biologists seeking to enter the nursing field with a master’s degree.

Comparing your options is essential. Two popular choices in online RN to BSN programs—Capella and Chamberlain—can be reviewed in detail here: capella rn to bsn vs chamberlain rn to bsn. This helps prospective students make informed decisions based on cost, flexibility, and fit.

Affordability is another key concern for many students. You can find the cheapest bsn to msn online programs to help save on tuition costs while advancing your qualifications. These diverse pathways ensure that students from various backgrounds can find a route that matches their career goals in both science and healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Richard M. Warwick

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles