World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 60 9546 8638 2682 2205 144 18124

Jack R. Lancaster publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jack R. Lancaster between 1975 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jack R. Lancaster published across 48 years, from 1975 to 2022, averaging 4.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2006. 7 of the 214 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1975 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2006. 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 2 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 2 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 5 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 3 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 10 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 1 publication 2020: 5 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 2 publications
1975 2022

214 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jack R. Lancaster: publications per year, 1975 to 2022
Year Publications
1975 1
1976 0
1977 2
1978 1
1979 2
1980 2
1981 3
1982 5
1983 1
1984 0
1985 2
1986 3
1987 1
1988 1
1989 2
1990 1
1991 3
1992 4
1993 8
1994 10
1995 7
1996 8
1997 4
1998 5
1999 5
2000 4
2001 3
2002 5
2003 4
2004 4
2005 6
2006 14
2007 9
2008 10
2009 5
2010 12
2011 7
2012 12
2013 5
2014 5
2015 5
2016 3
2017 6
2018 1
2019 1
2020 5
2021 5
2022 2
Total 214
Download as CSV

Jack R. Lancaster publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jack R. Lancaster sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 144 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218 144
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Jack R. Lancaster D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jack R. Lancaster sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60–61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882 60
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jack R. Lancaster is affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh in the United States and has contributed extensively to research in biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine. Their publications cover a range of topics including sulfur compounds in biology, inhalation and respiratory drug delivery, nitric oxide and endothelin effects, polyamine metabolism, drug transport and resistance mechanisms, ion channel regulation, and amino acid enzymes and metabolism.

Their recent papers include:

  • Hydrogen sulfide stimulates Mycobacterium tuberculosis respiration, growth and pathogenesis, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Historical origins of the discovery of mammalian nitric oxide (nitrogen monoxide) production/physiology/pathophysiology, 2020, Biochemical Pharmacology
  • The Role of Host-Generated H2S in Microbial Pathogenesis: New Perspectives on Tuberculosis, 2020, Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
  • Mycobacterium tuberculosis H2S Functions as a Sink to Modulate Central Metabolism, Bioenergetics, and Drug Susceptibility, 2021, Antioxidants
  • Quantitation of spin probe-detectable oxidants in cells using electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy: To probe or to trap?, 2020, Free Radical Biology and Medicine

Frequent co-authors of Lancaster include:

  • Joel N. Glasgow
  • Adrie J. C. Steyn
  • Ritesh Rajesh Sevalkar
  • Vineel P. Reddy
  • Md. Aejazur Rahman

They regularly publish in the following venues:

  • Free Radical Biology and Medicine
  • Redox Biology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature Communications
  • Biochemical Pharmacology

In terms of research subfields, their work spans biochemistry, molecular biology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, physiology, and oncology.

Main topics covered in their research include:

  • Sulfur Compounds in Biology
  • Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
  • Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
  • Polyamine Metabolism and Applications
  • Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
  • Ion channel regulation and function
  • Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism

Best Publications

  • The biological lifetime of nitric oxide: Implications for the perivascular dynamics of NO and O2

    Douglas D. Thomas;Xiaoping Liu;Stephen P. Kantrow;Jack R. Lancaster

  • Accelerated reaction of nitric oxide with O2 within the hydrophobic interior of biological membranes

    Xiaoping Liu;Mark J. S. Miller;Mahesh S. Joshi;Douglas D. Thomas

  • Aminoguanidine, a Novel Inhibitor of Nitric Oxide Formation, Prevents Diabetic Vascular Dysfunction

    John A. Corbett;Ronald G. Tilton;Kathy Chang;Khalid S. Hasan

  • Nitrate and nitrite in biology, nutrition and therapeutics

    Jon O Lundberg;Mark T Gladwin;Amrita Ahluwalia;Nigel Benjamin

  • The emerging biology of the nitrite anion

    Mark T Gladwin;Alan N Schechter;Daniel B Kim-Shapiro;Rakesh P Patel

  • EPR demonstration of iron-nitrosyl complex formation by cytotoxic activated macrophages.

    J R Lancaster;J B Hibbs

  • Simulation of the diffusion and reaction of endogenously produced nitric oxide.

    Unknown

  • Diffusion-limited Reaction of Free Nitric Oxide with Erythrocytes

    Xiaoping Liu;Mark J.S. Miller;Mahesh S. Joshi;Halina Sadowska-Krowicka

  • Quantitation of nitrate and nitrite in extracellular fluids

    Matthew B. Grisham;Glenda G. Johnson;Jack R. Lancaster

  • A Tutorial on the Diffusibility and Reactivity of Free Nitric Oxide

    Unknown

  • Polarographic measurement of hydrogen sulfide production and consumption by mammalian tissues.

    Jeannette E. Doeller;T. Scott Isbell;Gloria Benavides;Jeffrey Koenitzer

  • Mycobacterium tuberculosis DosS is a redox sensor and DosT is a hypoxia sensor.

    Ashwani Kumar;Jose C. Toledo;Rakesh P. Patel;Jack R. Lancaster

  • Interleukin 1 beta induces the formation of nitric oxide by beta-cells purified from rodent islets of Langerhans. Evidence for the beta-cell as a source and site of action of nitric oxide.

    J. A. Corbett;Jin Lin Wang;M. A. Sweetland;J. R. Lancaster

  • Chemical foundations of hydrogen sulfide biology.

    Qian Li;Jack R. Lancaster

  • Nitric oxide's reactions with hemoglobin: a view through the SNO-storm

    Mark T. Gladwin;Jack R. Lancaster;Bruce A. Freeman;Alan N. Schechter

  • What part of NO don't you understand? Some answers to the cardinal questions in nitric oxide biology.

    Bradford G. Hill;Brian P. Dranka;Shannon M. Bailey;Jack R. Lancaster

  • Metallothionein protects against the cytotoxic and DNA-damaging effects of nitric oxide

    MA Schwarz;JS Lazo;JC Yalowich;WP Allen

  • Loss and Degradation of Enzyme-bound Heme Induced by Cellular Nitric Oxide Synthesis

    Young-Myeong Kim;Hector A. Bergonia;Claudia Müller;Bruce R. Pitt

  • Nitrogen oxide-induced autoprotection in isolated rat hepatocytes

    Young-Myeong Kim;Hector Bergonia;Jack R. Lancaster

  • Nitric oxide is consumed, rather than conserved, by reaction with oxyhemoglobin under physiological conditions.

    Mahesh S. Joshi;T. Bruce Ferguson;Tae H. Han;Daniel R. Hyduke

  • Reactive oxygen species mediate tumor necrosis factor alpha-converting, enzyme-dependent ectodomain shedding induced by phorbol myristate acetate

    Zili Zhang;Peter Oliver;Jack R. Jr. Lancaster;Paul O. Schwarzenberger

  • Steroidogenic electron transport in adrenal cortex mitochondria.

    Lambeth Jd;Seybert Dw;Lancaster;Salerno Jc

  • Dinitrosyliron complexes and the mechanism(s) of cellular protein nitrosothiol formation from nitric oxide

    Charles A. Bosworth;José C. Toledo;Jaroslaw W. Zmijewski;Qian Li

  • Hydrogen sulfide mediates vasoactivity in an O2-dependent manner.

    Jeffrey R. Koenitzer;T. Scott Isbell;Hetal D. Patel;Gloria A. Benavides

Frequent Co-Authors

Bruce A. Freeman
Bruce A. Freeman University of Pittsburgh
Sadis Matalon
Sadis Matalon University of Alabama at Birmingham
John A. Corbett
John A. Corbett Medical College of Wisconsin
Jaroslaw W. Zmijewski
Jaroslaw W. Zmijewski University of Alabama at Birmingham
Ana Denicola
Ana Denicola University of the Republic
Michael L. McDaniel
Michael L. McDaniel Washington University in St. Louis
Francisco J. Schopfer
Francisco J. Schopfer University of Pittsburgh
Amit Gaggar
Amit Gaggar University of Alabama at Birmingham
Victor M. Darley-Usmar
Victor M. Darley-Usmar University of Alabama at Birmingham
Mark T. Dransfield
Mark T. Dransfield University of Alabama at Birmingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Chemistry degree in the USA opens doors to various specialized fields, including forensic science. For those interested in this intersection, exploring online colleges for forensic science offers a flexible and affordable route to gain essential skills. These programs often combine chemistry knowledge with criminal investigation techniques, making graduates valuable assets in legal and law enforcement sectors.

For advanced study, earning a masters in forensic psychology online can complement a chemistry background by providing insights into criminal behavior and psychological evaluation, broadening career prospects.

Understanding careers in forensics highlights diverse opportunities, from crime lab analysis to consulting roles. These positions often require a blend of scientific expertise and practical application skills, which specialized online degrees can help cultivate effectively.

Budget is a key consideration when selecting a program. Knowing how much is criminal justice school can help students plan financially and compare options, ensuring they invest in a program that balances quality and affordability.

Best Scientists Citing Jack R. Lancaster

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles